The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Platelet Function Tests in Predicting Clinical Outcome in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stent Implantation
Abstract
Context: High on-treatment platelet reactivity is associated with atherothrombotic events following coronary stent implantation. Objective: To evaluate the capability of multiple platelet function tests to predict clinical outcome. Design, Setting, and Patients: Prospective, observational, single-center cohort study of 1069 consecutive patients taking clopidogrel undergoing elective coronary stent implantation between December 2005 and December 2007. On-treatment platelet reactivity was measured in parallel by light transmittance aggregometry, VerifyNow P2Y12 and Plateletworks assays, and the IMPACT-R and the platelet function analysis system (PFA-100) (with the Dade PFA collagen/adenosine diphosphate (ADP) cartridge and Innovance PFA P2Y). Cutoff values for high on-treatment platelet reactivity were established by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Main Outcome Measurement: The primary end point was defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke. The primary safety end point included TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) criteria major and minor bleeding. Results: Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that at 1-year follow-up, the primary end point occurred more frequently in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity when assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (52 [11.7%; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 8.9%-15.0%] vs 36 [6.0%; 95% CI, 4.2%-8.2%] P < .001; n = 1049), VerifyNow (54 [13.3%; 95% CI, 10.2%-17.0%] vs 37 [5.7%; 95% CI, 4.1%-7.8%] P < .001; n = 1052), Plateletworks (33 [12.6%; 95% CI, 8.8%-17.2%] vs 21 [6.1%; 95% CI, 3.8%-9.2%] P = .005; n = 606), and Innovance PFA P2Y (18 [12.2%; 95% CI; 7.4%-18.6%] vs 28 [6.3%; 95% CI, 4.3%-8.9%] P = .02; n = 588). ROC-curve analysis demonstrated that light transmittance aggregometry (area under the curve [AUC], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.58-0.68), VerifyNow (AUC, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.57-0.67), and Plateletworks (AUC, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.53-0.69) had modest ability to discriminate between patients with and without primary end point at 1-year follow-up. The IMPACT-R (n = 905) and the Siemens PFA Collagen/ADP (n = 812) were unable to discriminate between patients with and without the primary end point at 1-year follow-up (all AUCs included 0.50 in the CI). None of the tests identified patients at risk for bleeding. Conclusions: Of the platelet function tests assessed, light transmittance aggregometry, VerifyNow, Plateletworks, and Innovance PFA P2Y were significantly associated with the primary end point. However, the predictive accuracy of these 4 tests was only modest. None of the tests provided accurate prognostic information to identify patients at higher risk of bleeding following stent implantation. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00352014
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials: A Case for Standardized Definitions
Cutlip, D. E., Windecker, S., Mehran, R., Boam, A., Cohen, D. J., van Es, G.-A., Gabriel Steg, P., Morel, M.-A., Mauri, L., Vranckx, P., et al. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.685313 · Cited by 5,497
Steinhubl, S. R., Berger, P. B., Mann III, J. T., Fry, E. T. A., DeLago, A., Wilmer, C., Topol, E. J., & for the CREDO Investigators (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.19.2411 · Cited by 3,078
Mehta, S. R., Yusuf, S., Peters, R. J., Bertrand, M. E., Lewis, B. S., Natarajan, M. K., Malmberg, K., Rupprecht, H.-J., Zhao, F., Chrolavicius, S., et al. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05701-4 · Cited by 2,809
Mehta, S. R., Yusuf, S., & Peters, R. J. G. (2002) · ACC Current Journal Review · doi:10.1016/s1062-1458(02)00559-7 · Cited by 2,578
Matetzky, S., Shenkman, B., Guetta, V., Shechter, M., Beinart, R., Goldenberg, I., Novikov, I., Pres, H., Savion, N., Varon, D., et al. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000130846.46168.03 · Cited by 1,354
Predictors of Coronary Stent Thrombosis
van Werkum, J. W., Heestermans, A. A., Zomer, A. C., Kelder, J. C., Suttorp, M.-J., Rensing, B. J., Koolen, J. J., Brueren, B. R. G., Dambrink, J.-H. E., Hautvast, R. W., et al. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.055 · Cited by 700
Self-citationPrice, M. J., Endemann, S., Gollapudi, R. R., Valencia, R., Stinis, C. T., Levisay, J. P., Ernst, A., Sawhney, N. S., Schatz, R. A., & Teirstein, P. S. (2008) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn046 · Cited by 651
Sibbing, D., Braun, S., Morath, T., Mehilli, J., Vogt, W., Schömig, A., Kastrati, A., & von Beckerath, N. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.030 · Cited by 651
Platelet Reactivity in Patients and Recurrent Events Post-Stenting
Gurbel, P. A., Bliden, K. P., Guyer, K., Cho, P. W., Zaman, K. A., Kreutz, R. P., Bassi, A. K., & Tantry, U. S. (2005) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.041 · Cited by 644
Hochholzer, W., Trenk, D., Bestehorn, H.-P., Fischer, B., Valina, C. M., Ferenc, M., Gick, M., Caputo, A., Büttner, H. J., & Neumann, F.-J. (2006) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.065 · Cited by 589
Cited by
Roffi, M., Patrono, C., Collet, J.-P., Mueller, C., Valgimigli, M., Andreotti, F., Bax, J. J., Borger, M. A., Brotons, C., Chew, D. P., et al. (2016) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320 · Cited by 8,261
Price, M. J. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.290 · Cited by 1,308
Tantry, U. S., Bonello, L., Aradi, D., Price, M. J., Jeong, Y.-H., Angiolillo, D. J., Stone, G. W., Curzen, N., Geisler, T., ten Berg, J., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.101 · Cited by 910
Self-citationBedside monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy for coronary stenting
Collet, J.-P., Cuisset, T., Rangé, G., Cayla, G., Elhadad, S., Pouillot, C., Henry, P., Motreff, P., Carrié, D., Boueri, Z., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1209979 · Cited by 887
Impact of Platelet Reactivity on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Brar, S. S., ten Berg, J., Marcucci, R., Price, M. J., Valgimigli, M., Kim, H.-S., Patti, G., Breet, N. J., DiSciascio, G., Cuisset, T., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.059 · Cited by 422
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Breet, N. J., van Werkum, J. W., Bouman, H. J., Kelder, J. C., Ruven, H. J. T., Bal, E. T., Deneer, V. H., Harmsze, A. M., van der Heyden, J. A. S., Rensing, B. J. W. M., Suttorp, M. J., Hackeng, C. M., & ten Berg, J. M.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2010-02-24
- Volume
- 303
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 754
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2149465085
- Cited by
- 850
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 79.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Platelet Function Tests in Predicting Clinical Outcome in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stent Implantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2010.181
- The paper
- Breet, N. J., van Werkum, J. W., Bouman, H. J., Kelder, J. C., Ruven, H. J. T., Bal, E. T., Deneer, V. H., Harmsze, A. M., van der Heyden, J. A. S., Rensing, B. J. W. M., Suttorp, M. J., Hackeng, C. M., & ten Berg, J. M. (2010). Comparison of Platelet Function Tests in Predicting Clinical Outcome in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stent Implantation. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.181
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.