The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association Between Smoking and Risk of Bladder Cancer Among Men and Women
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Previous studies indicate that the population attributable risk (PAR) of bladder cancer for tobacco smoking is 50% to 65% in men and 20% to 30% in women and that current cigarette smoking triples bladder cancer risk relative to never smoking. During the last 30 years, incidence rates have remained stable in the United States in men (123.8 per 100,000 person-years to 142.2 per 100,000 person-years) and women (32.5 per 100,000 person-years to 33.2 per 100,000 person-years); however, changing smoking prevalence and cigarette composition warrant revisiting risk estimates for smoking and bladder cancer. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between tobacco smoking and bladder cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Men (n = 281,394) and women (n = 186,134) of the National Institutes of Health-AARP (NIH-AARP) Diet and Health Study cohort completed a lifestyle questionnaire and were followed up between October 25, 1995, and December 31, 2006. Previous prospective cohort studies of smoking and incident bladder cancer were identified by systematic review and relative risks were estimated from fixed-effects models with heterogeneity assessed by the I(2) statistic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hazard ratios (HRs), PARs, and number needed to harm (NNH). RESULTS: During 4,518,941 person-years of follow-up, incident bladder cancer occurred in 3896 men (144.0 per 100,000 person-years) and 627 women (34.5 per 100,000 person-years). Former smokers (119.8 per 100,000 person-years; HR, 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-2.44; NNH, 1250) and current smokers (177.3 per 100,000 person-years; HR, 4.06; 95% CI, 3.66-4.50; NNH, 727) had higher risks of bladder cancer than never smokers (39.8 per 100,000 person-years). In contrast, the summary risk estimate for current smoking in 7 previous studies (initiated between 1963 and 1987) was 2.94 (95% CI, 2.45-3.54; I(2) = 0.0%). The PAR for ever smoking in our study was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.45-0.54) in men and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.45-0.59) in women. CONCLUSION: Compared with a pooled estimate of US data from cohorts initiated between 1963 and 1987, relative risks for smoking in the more recent NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study cohort were higher, with PARs for women comparable with those for men.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Xu, J., & Ward, E. (2010) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20073 · Cited by 12,596
Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data.
BRUZZI, P., GREEN, S. B., BYAR, D. P., BRINTON, L. A., & SCHAIRER, C. (1985) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114174 · Cited by 1,214
Munger, R. G., Folsom, A. R., Kushi, L. H., Kaye, S. A., & Sellers, T. A. (1992) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116485 · Cited by 353 · cited 1×
“Tripathi et al,37 2002 Iowa Women’s Health Study Women 1986-1998 6238 24 723 (66) 42 (38) 5619 (15) 45 (41) 16 ( 20 cigarettes/d)39,c,d 4.”
Spiegelman, D., Hertzmark, E., & Wand, H. C. (2007) · Cancer Causes & Control · doi:10.1007/s10552-006-0090-y · Cited by 298
Cited by
Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., & Jemal, A. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21492 · Cited by 84,109
Bladder Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Global Overview and Recent Trends
Antoni, S., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Znaor, A., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2017) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.010 · Cited by 2,514
EAU Guidelines on Non–Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2013
Babjuk, M., Burger, M., Zigeuner, R., Shariat, S. F., van Rhijn, B. W. G., Compérat, E., Sylvester, R. J., Kaasinen, E., Böhle, A., Palou Redorta, J., et al. (2013) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.003 · Cited by 1,174
Treatment of Non-Metastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO Guideline
Chang, S. S., Bochner, B. H., Chou, R., Dreicer, R., Kamat, A. M., Lerner, S. P., Lotan, Y., Meeks, J. J., Michalski, J. M., Morgan, T. M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.086 · Cited by 938
Tumor Mutational Burden as a Predictive Biomarker in Solid Tumors
Sha, D., Jin, Z., Budczies, J., Kluck, K., Stenzinger, A., & Sinicrope, F. A. (2020) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0522 · Cited by 859
Metadata
- Authors
- Freedman, N. D.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2011-08-17
- Volume
- 306
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 737
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2164960433
- Cited by
- 1,141
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 28.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association Between Smoking and Risk of Bladder Cancer Among Men and Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2011.1142
- The paper
- Freedman, N. D. (2011). Association Between Smoking and Risk of Bladder Cancer Among Men and Women. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.