Cited by 2Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Advancements in the application of deep learning for coronary artery calcification

Open access
Tang, Ke-Xin, Wu, Yan-Lin, Shan, Su-Kang, Yuan, Ling-Qing·2025·Meta-Radiology

Abstract

Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) is a characteristic pathological alteration in the progression of coronary atherosclerosis and is considered an independent predictor of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE). The distribution, pathological classification, and quantitative evaluation of CAC are pivotal factors influencing the incidence of MACE and guiding intracoronary interventions. Deep learning methods, a widely explored domain in artificial intelligence, achieve learning and understanding of big data by constructing multi-layer neural network models. This robust approach offers significant support for intelligent medical image diagnosis within clinical settings. Currently, deep learning methods have been applied to the identification and quantification of coronary artery calcification plaques, which not only improve diagnostic efficiency but also contribute to the early prevention and treatment of patients at moderate to low risk. This article reviews the progress of deep learning applications in coronary artery calcification to gain a comprehensive understanding of this field. • Coronary calcification predicts cardiovascular risk, requiring precise imaging for diagnosis and treatment guidance. • Deep learning enhances medical imaging analysis, boosting diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. • Deep learning assesses coronary calcification via segmentation, plaque detection, and score calculation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.metrad.2025.100134

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reviews of AI-CAC generally focused on algorithmic performance rather than clinical implementation.

    “Reviews generally focused on algorithmic performance rather than clinical implementation.”
  • More than 60 published and proprietary AI algorithms for CAC detection and scoring on chest imaging have been reviewed in the last 2 years, varying in populations, imaging protocols, training datasets, validation approaches and model architectures.

    “More than 60 published and proprietary AI algorithms for CAC detection and scoring on chest imaging (AI-CAC) have been reviewed in the last 2 years,12–15 varying in populations, imaging protocols, training datasets, validation approaches and model architectures.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, K.-X., Wu, Y.-L., Shan, S.-K., & Yuan, L.-Q.
Affiliations
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yuan, Ling-Qing
Venue
Meta-Radiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-03
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
100134
ISSN
2950-1628 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407172040
Cited by
2
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Meta-Radiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC2507600, 2021YFC2501701, 2021YFC2501701,2023YFC2507600)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (82370892, 82070910, 82370892,82070910)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
coronary artery calcification, deep learning, coronary artery disease, major adverse cardiovascular events, plaque segmentation, cardiovascular risk prediction, medical image analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review