The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of an Investigational Vaccine for Preventing Staphylococcus aureus Infections After Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Randomized Trial
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Infections due to Staphylococcus aureus are serious complications of cardiothoracic surgery. A novel vaccine candidate (V710) containing the highly conserved S. aureus iron surface determinant B is immunogenic and generally well tolerated in volunteers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative vaccination in preventing serious postoperative S. aureus infection in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind, randomized, event-driven trial conducted between December 2007 and August 2011 among 8031 patients aged 18 years or older who were scheduled for full median sternotomy within 14 to 60 days of vaccination at 165 sites in 26 countries. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive a single 0.5-mL intramuscular injection of either V710 vaccine, 60 μg (n = 4015), or placebo (n = 4016). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was prevention of S. aureus bacteremia and/or deep sternal wound infection (including mediastinitis) through postoperative day 90. Secondary end points included all S. aureus surgical site and invasive infections through postoperative day 90. Three interim analyses with futility assessments were planned. RESULTS: The independent data monitoring committee recommended termination of the study after the second interim analysis because of safety concerns and low efficacy. At the end of the study, the V710 vaccine was not significantly more efficacious than placebo in preventing either the primary end points (22/3528 V710 vaccine recipients [2.6 per 100 person-years] vs 27/3517 placebo recipients [3.2 per 100 person-years]; relative risk, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.44-1.48; P = .58) or secondary end points despite eliciting robust antibody responses. Compared with placebo, the V710 vaccine was associated with more adverse experiences during the first 14 days after vaccination (1219/3958 vaccine recipients [30.8%; 95% CI, 29.4%-32.3%] and 866/3967 placebo recipients [21.8%; 95% CI, 20.6%-23.1%], including 797 [20.1%; 95% CI, 18.9%-21.4%] and 378 [9.5%; 95% CI, 8.6%-10.5%] with injection site reactions and 66 [1.7%; 95% CI, 1.3%-2.1%] and 51 [1.3%; 95% CI, 1.0%-1.7%] with serious adverse events, respectively) and a significantly higher rate of multiorgan failure during the entire study (31 vs 17 events; 0.9 [95% CI, 0.6-1.2] vs 0.5 [95% CI, 0.3-0.8] events per 100 person-years; P = .04). Although the overall incidence of vaccine-related serious adverse events (1 in each group) and the all-cause mortality rate (201/3958 vs 177/3967; 5.7 [95% CI, 4.9-6.5] vs 5.0 [95% CI, 4.3-5.7] deaths per 100 person-years; P = .20) were not statistically different between groups, the mortality rate in patients with staphylococcal infections was significantly higher among V710 vaccine than placebo recipients (15/73 vs 4/96; 23.0 [95% CI, 12.9-37.9] vs 4.2 [95% CI, 1.2-10.8] per 100 person-years; difference, 18.8 [95% CI, 8.0-34.1] per 100 person-years). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery with median sternotomy, the use of a vaccine against S. aureus compared with placebo did not reduce the rate of serious postoperative S. aureus infections and was associated with increased mortality among patients who developed S. aureus infections. These findings do not support the use of the V710 vaccine for patients undergoing surgical interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00518687.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interleukin-17 and Type 17 Helper T Cells
Miossec, P., Korn, T., & Kuchroo, V. K. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0707449 · Cited by 1,409
Vaccine assembly from surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus
Stranger-Jones, Y. K., Bae, T., & Schneewind, O. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0606863103 · Cited by 309
Kuklin, N. A., Clark, D. J., Secore, S., Cook, J., Cope, L. D., McNeely, T., Noble, L., Brown, M. J., Zorman, J. K., Wang, X. M., et al. (2006) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.74.4.2215-2223.2006 · Cited by 264
Self-citationKim, H. K., DeDent, A., Cheng, A. G., McAdow, M., Bagnoli, F., Missiakas, D. M., & Schneewind, O. (2010) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.097 · Cited by 158
Harro, C., Betts, R., Orenstein, W., Kwak, E.-J., Greenberg, H. E., Onorato, M. T., Hartzel, J., Lipka, J., DiNubile, M. J., & Kartsonis, N. (2010) · Clinical and Vaccine Immunology · doi:10.1128/cvi.00356-10 · Cited by 57 · cited 1×
“CABG surgery and valve 313 (8) 357 (9) 670 (8)”
Ebert, T., Smith, S., Pancari, G., Clark, D., Hampton, R., Secore, S., Towne, V., Fan, H., Wang, X.-M., Wu, X., et al. (2010) · Human Antibodies · doi:10.3233/hab-2010-0235 · Cited by 50
Self-citationPancari, G., Fan, H., Smith, S., Joshi, A., Haimbach, R., Clark, D., Li, Y., Hua, J., McKelvey, T., Ou, Y., et al. (2012) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2012.00036 · Cited by 25
Cited by
Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus
Foster, T. J., Geoghegan, J. A., Ganesh, V. K., & Höök, M. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3161 · Cited by 1,533
Access to effective antimicrobials: a worldwide challenge
Laxminarayan, R., Matsoso, P., Pant, S., Brower, C., Røttingen, J.-A., Klugman, K., & Davies, S. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00474-2 · Cited by 1,465
Skeletal infections: microbial pathogenesis, immunity and clinical management
Masters, E. A., Ricciardi, B. F., Bentley, K. L. D. M., Moriarty, T. F., Schwarz, E. M., & Muthukrishnan, G. (2022) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00686-0 · Cited by 735
Masters, E. A., Trombetta, R. P., de Mesy Bentley, K. L., Boyce, B. F., Gill, A. L., Gill, S. R., Nishitani, K., Ishikawa, M., Morita, Y., Ito, H., et al. (2019) · Bone Research · doi:10.1038/s41413-019-0061-z · Cited by 575
Delany, I., Rappuoli, R., & De Gregorio, E. (2014) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1002/emmm.201403876 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Fowler, V. G., Allen, K. B., Moreira, E. D., Moustafa, M., Isgro, F., Boucher, H. W., Corey, G. R., Carmeli, Y., Betts, R., Hartzel, J. S., Chan, I. S. F., McNeely, T. B., Kartsonis, N. A., Guris, D., Onorato, M. T., Smugar, S. S., DiNubile, M. J., & Sobanjo-ter Meulen, A.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2013-04-03
- Volume
- 309
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1368
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2086165685
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 27.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of an Investigational Vaccine for Preventing Staphylococcus aureus Infections After Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Randomized Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2013.3010
- The paper
- Fowler, V. G., Allen, K. B., Moreira, E. D., Moustafa, M., Isgro, F., Boucher, H. W., Corey, G. R., Carmeli, Y., Betts, R., Hartzel, J. S., Chan, I. S. F., McNeely, T. B., Kartsonis, N. A., Guris, D., Onorato, M. T., Smugar, S. S., DiNubile, M. J., & Sobanjo-ter Meulen, A. (2013). Effect of an Investigational Vaccine for Preventing Staphylococcus aureus Infections After Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Randomized Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.3010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.