The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electronic Medication Packaging Devices and Medication Adherence: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Medication nonadherence, which has been estimated to affect 28% to 31% of US patients with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes, may be improved by electronic medication packaging (EMP) devices (adherence-monitoring devices incorporated into the packaging of a prescription medication). OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether EMP devices are associated with improved adherence and to identify and describe common features of EMP devices. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Systematic review of peer-reviewed studies testing the effectiveness of EMP systems in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and Sociological Abstracts databases from searches conducted to June 13, 2014, with extraction of associations between the interventions and adherence, as well as other key findings. Each study was assessed for bias using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; features of EMP devices and interventions were qualitatively assessed. FINDINGS: Thirty-seven studies (32 randomized and 5 nonrandomized) including 4326 patients met inclusion criteria (10 patient interface-only "simple" interventions and 29 "complex" interventions integrated into the health care system [2 qualified for both categories]). Overall, the effect estimates for differences in mean adherence ranged from a decrease of 2.9% to an increase of 34.0%, and the those for differences in the proportion of patients defined as adherent ranged from a decrease of 8.0% to an increase of 49.5%. We identified 5 common EMP characteristics: recorded dosing events and stored records of adherence, audiovisual reminders to cue dosing, digital displays, real-time monitoring, and feedback on adherence performance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Many varieties of EMP devices exist. However, data supporting their use are limited, with variability in the quality of studies testing EMP devices. Devices integrated into the care delivery system and designed to record dosing events are most frequently associated with improved adherence, compared with other devices. Higher-quality evidence is needed to determine the effect, if any, of these low-cost interventions on medication nonadherence and to identify their most useful components.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interventions for enhancing medication adherence
Nieuwlaat, R., Wilczynski, N., Navarro, T., Hobson, N., Jeffery, R., Keepanasseril, A., Agoritsas, T., Mistry, N., Iorio, A., Jack, S., et al. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000011.pub4 · Cited by 2,945
Medication compliance and persistence: terminology and definitions
Cramer, J. A., Roy, A., Burrell, A., Fairchild, C. J., Fuldeore, M. J., Ollendorf, D. A., & Wong, P. K. (2008) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00213.x · Cited by 2,220
Medication adherence: emerging use of technology
Granger, B. B., & Bosworth, H. B. (2011) · Current Opinion in Cardiology · doi:10.1097/hco.0b013e328347c150 · Cited by 165
Ingredients of Successful Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence
Zullig, L. L., Peterson, E. D., & Bosworth, H. B. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.282818 · Cited by 136 · cited 2×
“Study Selection Studies were included if (1) they involved EMP, defined as electronic adherence-promoting devices integrated into the packaging of a prescription medication; (2) the medication at issue was a tablet, capsule, eyedrop, topical cream, or inhaled agent prescribed on a routine ongoing schedule of administr…”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
Medication adherence measures: An overview
Lam, W. Y., & Fresco, P. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/217047 · Cited by 1,308
Diretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensão Arterial – 2020
Barroso, W. K. S., Rodrigues, C. I. S., Bortolotto, L. A., Mota-Gomes, M. A., Brandão, A. A., Feitosa, A. D. D. M., Machado, C. A., Poli-de-Figueiredo, C. E., Amodeo, C., Mion, D., et al. (2021) · Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia · doi:10.36660/abc.20201238 · Cited by 1,068
Adherence in Hypertension: A Review of Prevalence, Risk Factors, Impact, and Management
Burnier, M., & Egan, B. M. (2019) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.118.313220 · Cited by 878
Chan, A. H. Y., Horne, R., Hankins, M., & Chisari, C. (2020) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.14193 · Cited by 523
An overview of the common methods used to measure treatment adherence
Anghel, L. A., Farcas, A. M., & Oprean, R. N. (2019) · Medicine and Pharmacy Reports · doi:10.15386/mpr-1201 · Cited by 335
Metadata
- Authors
- Checchi, K. D., Huybrechts, K. F., Avorn, J., & Kesselheim, A. S.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2014-09-24
- Volume
- 312
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1237
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1983406743
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electronic Medication Packaging Devices and Medication Adherence: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2014.10059
- The paper
- Checchi, K. D., Huybrechts, K. F., Avorn, J., & Kesselheim, A. S. (2014). Electronic Medication Packaging Devices and Medication Adherence: A Systematic Review. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.10059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.