Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 938

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Familial Risk and Heritability of Cancer Among Twins in Nordic Countries

Open access
Mucci, Lorelei A., Hjelmborg, Jacob B., Harris, Jennifer R., Czene, Kamila, Havelick, David J., Scheike, Thomas, Graff, Rebecca E., Holst, Klaus, Möller, Sören, Unger, Robert H., McIntosh, Christina, Nuttall, Elizabeth, Brandt, Ingunn, Penney, Kathryn L., Hartman, Mikael, Kraft, Peter, Parmigiani, Giovanni, Christensen, Kaare, Koskenvuo, Markku, Holm, Niels V., Heikkilä, Kauko, Pukkala, Eero, Skytthe, Axel, Adami, Hans-Olov, Kaprio, Jaakko, for the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer (NorTwinCan) Collaboration·2016·JAMA

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Estimates of familial cancer risk from population-based studies are essential components of cancer risk prediction. OBJECTIVE: To estimate familial risk and heritability of cancer types in a large twin cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective study of 80,309 monozygotic and 123,382 same-sex dizygotic twin individuals (N = 203,691) within the population-based registers of Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Twins were followed up a median of 32 years between 1943 and 2010. There were 50,990 individuals who died of any cause, and 3804 who emigrated and were lost to follow-up. EXPOSURES: Shared environmental and heritable risk factors among pairs of twins. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was incident cancer. Time-to-event analyses were used to estimate familial risk (risk of cancer in an individual given a twin's development of cancer) and heritability (proportion of variance in cancer risk due to interindividual genetic differences) with follow-up via cancer registries. Statistical models adjusted for age and follow-up time, and accounted for censoring and competing risk of death. RESULTS: A total of 27,156 incident cancers were diagnosed in 23,980 individuals, translating to a cumulative incidence of 32%. Cancer was diagnosed in both twins among 1383 monozygotic (2766 individuals) and 1933 dizygotic (2866 individuals) pairs. Of these, 38% of monozygotic and 26% of dizygotic pairs were diagnosed with the same cancer type. There was an excess cancer risk in twins whose co-twin was diagnosed with cancer, with estimated cumulative risks that were an absolute 5% (95% CI, 4%-6%) higher in dizygotic (37%; 95% CI, 36%-38%) and an absolute 14% (95% CI, 12%-16%) higher in monozygotic twins (46%; 95% CI, 44%-48%) whose twin also developed cancer compared with the cumulative risk in the overall cohort (32%). For most cancer types, there were significant familial risks and the cumulative risks were higher in monozygotic than dizygotic twins. Heritability of cancer overall was 33% (95% CI, 30%-37%). Significant heritability was observed for the cancer types of skin melanoma (58%; 95% CI, 43%-73%), prostate (57%; 95% CI, 51%-63%), nonmelanoma skin (43%; 95% CI, 26%-59%), ovary (39%; 95% CI, 23%-55%), kidney (38%; 95% CI, 21%-55%), breast (31%; 95% CI, 11%-51%), and corpus uteri (27%; 95% CI, 11%-43%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this long-term follow-up study among Nordic twins, there was significant excess familial risk for cancer overall and for specific types of cancer, including prostate, melanoma, breast, ovary, and uterus. This information about hereditary risks of cancers may be helpful in patient education and cancer risk counseling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2015.17703

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 938

Metadata

Authors
Mucci, L. A., Hjelmborg, J. B., Harris, J. R., Czene, K., Havelick, D. J., Scheike, T., Graff, R. E., Holst, K., Möller, S., Unger, R. H., McIntosh, C., Nuttall, E., Brandt, I., Penney, K. L., Hartman, M., Kraft, P., Parmigiani, G., Christensen, K., Koskenvuo, M., Holm, N. V., Heikkilä, K., Pukkala, E., Skytthe, A., Adami, H.-O., Kaprio, J., & for the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer (NorTwinCan) Collaboration
Venue
JAMA
Published
2016-01-05
Volume
315
Issue
1
Pages
68
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2225530246
Cited by
938
References
36
FWCI
54.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Familial Risk and Heritability of Cancer Among Twins in Nordic Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2015.17703
The paper
Mucci, L. A., Hjelmborg, J. B., Harris, J. R., Czene, K., Havelick, D. J., Scheike, T., Graff, R. E., Holst, K., Möller, S., Unger, R. H., McIntosh, C., Nuttall, E., Brandt, I., Penney, K. L., Hartman, M., Kraft, P., Parmigiani, G., Christensen, K., Koskenvuo, M., . . . for the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer (NorTwinCan) Collaboration. (2016). Familial Risk and Heritability of Cancer Among Twins in Nordic Countries. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.17703

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.