Cited by 87Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

When Will Mendelian Randomization Become Relevant for Clinical Practice and Public Health?

Open access
Davey Smith, George, Paternoster, Lavinia, Relton, Caroline·2017·JAMA

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2016.21189

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MR studies have shown that smoking causes lung cancer, but this is not useful therapeutically following the onset of the disease as smoking cessation is not a useful treatment once lung cancer has developed.

    “For example, although MR studies have shown that smoking causes lung cancer186, this is not useful therapeutically following the onset of the disease as smoking cessation is not a useful treatment once lung cancer has developed.”

    From Mendelian randomization (2022) · cites this paper as [186]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davey Smith, G., Paternoster, L., & Relton, C.
Affiliations
  • MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) at the University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2017-02-14
Volume
317
Issue
6
Pages
589
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2588618729
Cited by
87
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
Mendelian randomization, causal inference, clinical practice, public health, genetic variants, causal effect estimation
MeSH terms
Humans, Public Health, Random Allocation, Mendelian Randomization Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review