The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Radiosurgery Alone vs Radiosurgery With Whole Brain Radiation Therapy on Cognitive Function in Patients With 1 to 3 Brain Metastases: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) significantly improves tumor control in the brain after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), yet because of its association with cognitive decline, its role in the treatment of patients with brain metastases remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is less cognitive deterioration at 3 months after SRS alone vs SRS plus WBRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: At 34 institutions in North America, patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases were randomized to receive SRS or SRS plus WBRT between February 2002 and December 2013. INTERVENTIONS: The WBRT dose schedule was 30 Gy in 12 fractions; the SRS dose was 18 to 22 Gy in the SRS plus WBRT group and 20 to 24 Gy for SRS alone. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was cognitive deterioration (decline >1 SD from baseline on at least 1 cognitive test at 3 months) in participants who completed the baseline and 3-month assessments. Secondary end points included time to intracranial failure, quality of life, functional independence, long-term cognitive status, and overall survival. RESULTS: There were 213 randomized participants (SRS alone, n = 111; SRS plus WBRT, n = 102) with a mean age of 60.6 years (SD, 10.5 years); 103 (48%) were women. There was less cognitive deterioration at 3 months after SRS alone (40/63 patients [63.5%]) than when combined with WBRT (44/48 patients [91.7%]; difference, -28.2%; 90% CI, -41.9% to -14.4%; P < .001). Quality of life was higher at 3 months with SRS alone, including overall quality of life (mean change from baseline, -0.1 vs -12.0 points; mean difference, 11.9; 95% CI, 4.8-19.0 points; P = .001). Time to intracranial failure was significantly shorter for SRS alone compared with SRS plus WBRT (hazard ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.2-5.9; P < .001). There was no significant difference in functional independence at 3 months between the treatment groups (mean change from baseline, -1.5 points for SRS alone vs -4.2 points for SRS plus WBRT; mean difference, 2.7 points; 95% CI, -2.0 to 7.4 points; P = .26). Median overall survival was 10.4 months for SRS alone and 7.4 months for SRS plus WBRT (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.75-1.38; P = .92). For long-term survivors, the incidence of cognitive deterioration was less after SRS alone at 3 months (5/11 [45.5%] vs 16/17 [94.1%]; difference, -48.7%; 95% CI, -87.6% to -9.7%; P = .007) and at 12 months (6/10 [60%] vs 17/18 [94.4%]; difference, -34.4%; 95% CI, -74.4% to 5.5%; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases, the use of SRS alone, compared with SRS combined with WBRT, resulted in less cognitive deterioration at 3 months. In the absence of a difference in overall survival, these findings suggest that for patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases amenable to radiosurgery, SRS alone may be a preferred strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00377156.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yamamoto, M., Serizawa, T., Shuto, T., Akabane, A., Higuchi, Y., Kawagishi, J., Yamanaka, K., Sato, Y., Jokura, H., Yomo, S., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70061-0 · Cited by 1,447
Cited by
De Ruysscher, D., Niedermann, G., Burnet, N. G., Siva, S., Lee, A. W. M., & Hegi-Johnson, F. (2019) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0064-5 · Cited by 868
Treatment for Brain Metastases: ASCO-SNO-ASTRO Guideline
Vogelbaum, M. A., Brown, P. D., Messersmith, H., Brastianos, P. K., Burri, S., Cahill, D., Dunn, I. F., Gaspar, L. E., Gatson, N. T. N., Gondi, V., et al. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.02314 · Cited by 832
Self-citationYang, J. C.-H., Ahn, M.-J., Kim, D.-W., Ramalingam, S. S., Sequist, L. V., Su, W.-C., Kim, S.-W., Kim, J.-H., Planchard, D., Felip, E., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.70.3223 · Cited by 571
Current approaches to the management of brain metastases
Suh, J. H., Kotecha, R., Chao, S. T., Ahluwalia, M. S., Sahgal, A., & Chang, E. L. (2020) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-019-0320-3 · Cited by 553
Epidemiology of brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease
Lamba, N., Wen, P. Y., & Aizer, A. A. (2021) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noab101 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, P. D., Jaeckle, K., Ballman, K. V., Farace, E., Cerhan, J. H., Anderson, S. K., Carrero, X. W., Barker, F. G., Deming, R., Burri, S. H., Ménard, C., Chung, C., Stieber, V. W., Pollock, B. E., Galanis, E., Buckner, J. C., & Asher, A. L.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2016-07-26
- Volume
- 316
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 401
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2492450141
- Cited by
- 1,671
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 126.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Radiosurgery Alone vs Radiosurgery With Whole Brain Radiation Therapy on Cognitive Function in Patients With 1 to 3 Brain Metastases: A Randomized Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2016.9839
- The paper
- Brown, P. D., Jaeckle, K., Ballman, K. V., Farace, E., Cerhan, J. H., Anderson, S. K., Carrero, X. W., Barker, F. G., Deming, R., Burri, S. H., Ménard, C., Chung, C., Stieber, V. W., Pollock, B. E., Galanis, E., Buckner, J. C., & Asher, A. L. (2016). Effect of Radiosurgery Alone vs Radiosurgery With Whole Brain Radiation Therapy on Cognitive Function in Patients With 1 to 3 Brain Metastases: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.9839
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.