Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of Clinical, Imaging, and Thrombus Characteristics With Recanalization of Visible Intracranial Occlusion in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Open access
Menon, Bijoy K., Al-Ajlan, Fahad S., Najm, Mohamed, Puig, Josep, Castellanos, Mar, Dowlatshahi, Dar, Calleja, Ana, Sohn, Sung-Il, Ahn, Seong H., Poppe, Alex, Mikulik, Robert, Asdaghi, Negar, Field, Thalia S., Jin, Albert, Asil, Talip, Boulanger, Jean-Martin, Smith, Eric E., Coutts, Shelagh B., Barber, Phil A., Bal, Simerpreet, Subramanian, Suresh, Mishra, Sachin, Trivedi, Anurag, Dey, Sadanand, Eesa, Muneer, Sajobi, Tolulope, Goyal, Mayank, Hill, Michael D., Demchuk, Andrew M., for the INTERRSeCT Study Investigators·2018·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Recanalization of intracranial thrombus is associated with improved clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The association of intravenous alteplase treatment and thrombus characteristics with recanalization over time is important for stroke triage and future trial design. Objective: To examine recanalization over time across a range of intracranial thrombus occlusion sites and clinical and imaging characteristics in patients with ischemic stroke treated with intravenous alteplase or not treated with alteplase. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter prospective cohort study of 575 patients from 12 centers (in Canada, Spain, South Korea, the Czech Republic, and Turkey) with acute ischemic stroke and intracranial arterial occlusion demonstrated on computed tomographic angiography (CTA). Exposures: Demographics, clinical characteristics, time from alteplase to recanalization, and intracranial thrombus characteristics (location and permeability) defined on CTA. Main Outcomes and Measures: Recanalization on repeat CTA or on first angiographic acquisition of affected intracranial circulation obtained within 6 hours of baseline CTA, defined using the revised arterial occlusion scale (rAOL) (scores from 0 [primary occlusive lesion remains the same] to 3 [complete revascularization of primary occlusion]). Results: Among 575 patients (median age, 72 years [IQR, 63-80]; 51.5% men; median time from patient last known well to baseline CTA of 114 minutes [IQR, 74-180]), 275 patients (47.8%) received intravenous alteplase only, 195 (33.9%) received intravenous alteplase plus endovascular thrombectomy, 48 (8.3%) received endovascular thrombectomy alone, and 57 (9.9%) received conservative treatment. Median time from baseline CTA to recanalization assessment was 158 minutes (IQR, 79-268); median time from intravenous alteplase start to recanalization assessment was 132.5 minutes (IQR, 62-238). Successful recanalization occurred at an unadjusted rate of 27.3% (157/575) overall, including in 30.4% (143/470) of patients who received intravenous alteplase and 13.3% (14/105) who did not (difference, 17.1% [95% CI, 10.2%-25.8%]). Among patients receiving alteplase, the following factors were associated with recanalization: time from treatment start to recanalization assessment (OR, 1.28 for every 30-minute increase in time [95% CI, 1.18-1.38]), more distal thrombus location, eg, distal M1 middle cerebral artery (39/84 [46.4%]) vs internal carotid artery (10/92 [10.9%]) (OR, 5.61 [95% CI, 2.38-13.26]), and higher residual flow (thrombus permeability) grade, eg, hairline streak (30/45 [66.7%]) vs none (91/377 [24.1%]) (OR, 7.03 [95% CI, 3.32-14.87]). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with acute ischemic stroke, more distal thrombus location, greater thrombus permeability, and longer time to recanalization assessment were associated with recanalization of arterial occlusion after administration of intravenous alteplase; among patients who did not receive alteplase, rates of arterial recanalization were low. These findings may help inform treatment and triage decisions in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2018.12498

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Menon, B. K., Al-Ajlan, F. S., Najm, M., Puig, J., Castellanos, M., Dowlatshahi, D., Calleja, A., Sohn, S.-I., Ahn, S. H., Poppe, A., Mikulik, R., Asdaghi, N., Field, T. S., Jin, A., Asil, T., Boulanger, J.-M., Smith, E. E., Coutts, S. B., Barber, P. A., Bal, S., Subramanian, S., Mishra, S., Trivedi, A., Dey, S., Eesa, M., Sajobi, T., Goyal, M., Hill, M. D., Demchuk, A. M., & for the INTERRSeCT Study Investigators
Venue
JAMA
Published
2018-09-11
Volume
320
Issue
10
Pages
1017
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2890910536
Cited by
284
References
26
FWCI
17.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of Clinical, Imaging, and Thrombus Characteristics With Recanalization of Visible Intracranial Occlusion in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2018.12498
The paper
Menon, B. K., Al-Ajlan, F. S., Najm, M., Puig, J., Castellanos, M., Dowlatshahi, D., Calleja, A., Sohn, S.-I., Ahn, S. H., Poppe, A., Mikulik, R., Asdaghi, N., Field, T. S., Jin, A., Asil, T., Boulanger, J.-M., Smith, E. E., Coutts, S. B., Barber, P. A., . . . for the INTERRSeCT Study Investigators. (2018). Association of Clinical, Imaging, and Thrombus Characteristics With Recanalization of Visible Intracranial Occlusion in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.12498

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.