Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6,083

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Assessment of Rapid Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke

Open access
Goyal, Mayank, Demchuk, Andrew M., Menon, Bijoy K., Eesa, Muneer, Rempel, Jeremy L., Thornton, John, Roy, Daniel, Jovin, Tudor G., Willinsky, Robert A., Sapkota, Biggya L., Dowlatshahi, Dar, Frei, Donald F., Kamal, Noreen R., Montanera, Walter J., Poppe, Alexandre Y., Ryckborst, Karla J., Silver, Frank L., Shuaib, Ashfaq, Tampieri, Donatella, Williams, David, Bang, Oh Young, Baxter, Blaise W., Burns, Paul A., Choe, Hana, Heo, Ji-Hoe, Holmstedt, Christine A., Jankowitz, Brian, Kelly, Michael, Linares, Guillermo, Mandzia, Jennifer L., Shankar, Jai, Sohn, Sung-Il, Swartz, Richard H., Barber, Philip A., Coutts, Shelagh B., Smith, Eric E., Morrish, William F., Weill, Alain, Subramaniam, Suresh, Mitha, Alim P., Wong, John H., Lowerison, Mark W., Sajobi, Tolulope T., Hill, Michael D.·2015·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among patients with a proximal vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation, 60 to 80% of patients die within 90 days after stroke onset or do not regain functional independence despite alteplase treatment. We evaluated rapid endovascular treatment in addition to standard care in patients with acute ischemic stroke with a small infarct core, a proximal intracranial arterial occlusion, and moderate-to-good collateral circulation. METHODS: We randomly assigned participants to receive standard care (control group) or standard care plus endovascular treatment with the use of available thrombectomy devices (intervention group). Patients with a proximal intracranial occlusion in the anterior circulation were included up to 12 hours after symptom onset. Patients with a large infarct core or poor collateral circulation on computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography were excluded. Workflow times were measured against predetermined targets. The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days. A proportional odds model was used to calculate the common odds ratio as a measure of the likelihood that the intervention would lead to lower scores on the modified Rankin scale than would control care (shift analysis). RESULTS: The trial was stopped early because of efficacy. At 22 centers worldwide, 316 participants were enrolled, of whom 238 received intravenous alteplase (120 in the intervention group and 118 in the control group). In the intervention group, the median time from study CT of the head to first reperfusion was 84 minutes. The rate of functional independence (90-day modified Rankin score of 0 to 2) was increased with the intervention (53.0%, vs. 29.3% in the control group; P<0.001). The primary outcome favored the intervention (common odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.7 to 3.8; P<0.001), and the intervention was associated with reduced mortality (10.4%, vs. 19.0% in the control group; P=0.04). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 3.6% of participants in intervention group and 2.7% of participants in control group (P=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke with a proximal vessel occlusion, a small infarct core, and moderate-to-good collateral circulation, rapid endovascular treatment improved functional outcomes and reduced mortality. (Funded by Covidien and others; ESCAPE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01778335.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1414905

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 6,083

Metadata

Authors
Goyal, M., Demchuk, A. M., Menon, B. K., Eesa, M., Rempel, J. L., Thornton, J., Roy, D., Jovin, T. G., Willinsky, R. A., Sapkota, B. L., Dowlatshahi, D., Frei, D. F., Kamal, N. R., Montanera, W. J., Poppe, A. Y., Ryckborst, K. J., Silver, F. L., Shuaib, A., Tampieri, D., Williams, D., Bang, O. Y., Baxter, B. W., Burns, P. A., Choe, H., Heo, J.-H., Holmstedt, C. A., Jankowitz, B., Kelly, M., Linares, G., Mandzia, J. L., Shankar, J., Sohn, S.-I., Swartz, R. H., Barber, P. A., Coutts, S. B., Smith, E. E., Morrish, W. F., Weill, A., Subramaniam, S., Mitha, A. P., Wong, J. H., Lowerison, M. W., Sajobi, T. T., & Hill, M. D.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2015-03-12
Volume
372
Issue
11
Pages
1019-1030
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2171058244
Cited by
6,083
References
2
FWCI
526.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Assessment of Rapid Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1414905
The paper
Goyal, M., Demchuk, A. M., Menon, B. K., Eesa, M., Rempel, J. L., Thornton, J., Roy, D., Jovin, T. G., Willinsky, R. A., Sapkota, B. L., Dowlatshahi, D., Frei, D. F., Kamal, N. R., Montanera, W. J., Poppe, A. Y., Ryckborst, K. J., Silver, F. L., Shuaib, A., Tampieri, D., . . . Hill, M. D. (2015). Randomized Assessment of Rapid Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1414905

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.