Cited by 355Hemodynamic Monitoring and TherapySepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients

Effect of Reduced Exposure to Vasopressors on 90-Day Mortality in Older Critically Ill Patients With Vasodilatory Hypotension: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Lamontagne, François, Richards-Belle, Alvin, Thomas, Karen, Harrison, David A., Sadique, M. Zia, Grieve, Richard D., Camsooksai, Julie, Darnell, Robert +10 more·2020·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Vasopressors are commonly administered to intensive care unit (ICU) patients to raise blood pressure. Balancing risks and benefits of vasopressors is a challenge, particularly in older patients. Objective: To determine whether reducing exposure to vasopressors through permissive hypotension (mean arterial pressure [MAP] target, 60-65 mm Hg) reduces mortality at 90 days in ICU patients aged 65 years or older with vasodilatory hypotension. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 65 ICUs in the United Kingdom and included 2600 randomized patients aged 65 years or older with vasodilatory hypotension (assessed by treating clinician). The study was conducted from July 2017 to March 2019, and follow-up was completed in August 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to vasopressors guided either by MAP target (60-65 mm Hg, permissive hypotension) (n = 1291) or according to usual care (at the discretion of treating clinicians) (n = 1307). Main Outcome and Measures: The primary clinical outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days. Results: Of 2600 randomized patients, after removal of those who declined or had withdrawn consent, 2463 (95%) were included in the analysis of the primary outcome (mean [SD] age 75 years [7 years]; 1387 [57%] men). Patients randomized to the permissive hypotension group had lower exposure to vasopressors compared with those in the usual care group (median duration 33 hours vs 38 hours; difference in medians, -5.0; 95% CI, -7.8 to -2.2 hours; total dose in norepinephrine equivalents median, 17.7 mg vs 26.4 mg; difference in medians, -8.7 mg; 95% CI, -12.8 to -4.6 mg). At 90 days, 500 of 1221 (41.0%) in the permissive hypotension compared with 544 of 1242 (43.8%) in the usual care group had died (absolute risk difference, -2.85%; 95% CI, -6.75 to 1.05; P = .15) (unadjusted relative risk, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85-1.03). When adjusted for prespecified baseline variables, the odds ratio for 90-day mortality was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.98). Serious adverse events were reported for 79 patients (6.2%) in the permissive care group and 75 patients (5.8%) in the usual care group. The most common serious adverse events were acute renal failure (41 [3.2%] vs 33 [2.5%]) and supraventricular cardiac arrhythmia (12 [0.9%] vs 13 [1.0%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients 65 years or older receiving vasopressors for vasodilatory hypotension, permissive hypotension compared with usual care did not result in a statistically significant reduction in mortality at 90 days. However, the confidence interval around the point estimate for the primary outcome should be considered when interpreting the clinical importance of the study. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN10580502.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2020.0930

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ninety-day mortality in the permissive hypotension and usual care groups was similar (41.0% vs 43.8%).

    “Ninety-day mortality in the permissive hypotension and usual care groups was similar (41.0% vs 43.8%).”
  • Among 2463 analysed patients in that RCT, the permissive hypotension group had significantly less exposure to vasopressors, measured by duration of vasopressor infusion and total vasopressor doses in norepinephrine equivalents.

    “Among 2463 analysed patients, there was significantly less exposure to vasopressors in the intervention group, measured by duration of vasopressor infusion and total vasopressor doses expressed in norepinephrine equivalents.”
  • A recent RCT in patients aged 65 years and older with septic shock compared permissive hypotension (MAP 60-65 mm Hg) with usual care; the intervention group achieved a mean MAP of 66.7 mm Hg versus 72.6 mm Hg in usual care.

    “A recent RCT, monitored to ensure protocol and MAP target compliance, compared a “permissive hypotension” (MAP 60–65 mm Hg) group with a “usual care” group that received vasopressors and MAP targets set by the treating physician in patients aged 65 years and older with septic shock [82, 83]. The intervention group in this study achieved a mean MAP of 66.7 mm Hg, compared with 72.6 mm Hg in the”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lamontagne, F., Richards-Belle, A., Thomas, K., Harrison, D. A., Sadique, M. Z., Grieve, R. D., Camsooksai, J., Darnell, R., Gordon, A. C., Henry, D., Hudson, N., Mason, A. J., Saull, M., Whitman, C., Young, J. D., Rowan, K. M., Mouncey, P. R., & for the 65 trial investigators
Affiliations
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • Clinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
  • Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London, United Kingdom
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
  • Patient representative, United Kingdom
  • Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
Corresponding author
Lamontagne, François
Venue
JAMA
Published
2020-03-10
Volume
323
Issue
10
Pages
938
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W3005570206
Cited by
354
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 38
FWCI
42.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR/CS/009/007, 15/80/39, RP-2015-06-018, HTA/15/80/39)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Keywords
vasopressors, permissive hypotension, older adults, critically ill patients, 90-day mortality, norepinephrine, mean arterial pressure targets, vasopressor dose reduction, intensive care unit, septic shock, fluid resuscitation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Hypotension, Intensive Care Units, Male, Vasoconstrictor Agents, Confidence Intervals, Hospital Mortality, Atrial Premature Complexes, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Acute Kidney Injury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review