Cited by 162Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Adjustment for Baseline Characteristics in Randomized Clinical Trials

Open access
Holmberg, Mathias J., Andersen, Lars W.·2022·JAMA

Abstract

This Guide to Statistics and Methods provides an overview of the use of adjustment for baseline characteristics in the analysis of randomized clinical trials and emphasizes several important considerations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2022.21506

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holmberg, M. J., & Andersen, L. W.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Andersen, Lars W.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2022-12-06
Volume
328
Issue
21
Pages
2155
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4309183852
Cited by
161
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 21
FWCI
19.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
baseline characteristics, adjustment, randomized controlled trials, covariate adjustment, treatment effect estimation, confounding
MeSH terms
Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review