Cited by 67Pharmaceutical Economics and PolicyIntellectual Property and PatentsDiabetes Treatment and Management

Patents and regulatory exclusivities on GLP-1 receptor agonists

Open access
Alhiary, Rasha, Kesselheim, Aaron S., Gabriele, Sarah, Beall, Reed F., Tu, S. Sean, Feldman, William B.·2023·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists were first approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in 2005. Demand for these drugs has increased rapidly in recent years, as indications have expanded, but they remain expensive. Objective: To analyze how manufacturers of brand-name GLP-1 receptor agonists have used the patent and regulatory systems to extend periods of market exclusivity. Evidence Review: The annual US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Approved Drug Products With Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations was used to identify GLP-1 receptor agonists approved from 2005 to 2021 and to record patents and nonpatent statutory exclusivities listed for each product. Google Patents was used to extract additional data on patents, including whether each was obtained on the delivery device or another aspect of the product. The primary outcome was the duration of expected protection from generic competition, defined as the time elapsed from FDA approval until expiration of the last-to-expire patent or regulatory exclusivity. Findings: On the 10 GLP-1 receptor agonists included in the cohort, drug manufacturers listed with the FDA a median of 19.5 patents (IQR, 9.0-25.8) per product, including a median of 17 patents (IQR, 8.3-22.8) filed before FDA approval and 1.5 (IQR, 0-2.8) filed after FDA approval. Fifty-four percent of all patents listed on GLP-1 receptor agonists were on the delivery devices rather than active ingredients. Manufacturers augmented patent protection with a median of 2 regulatory exclusivities (IQR, 0-3) obtained at approval and 1 (IQR, 0.3-4.3) added after approval. The median total duration of expected protection after FDA approval, when accounting for both preapproval and postapproval patents and regulatory exclusivities, was 18.3 years (IQR, 16.0-19.4). No generic firm has successfully challenged patents on GLP-1 receptor agonists to gain FDA approval. Conclusions and Relevance: Patent and regulatory reform is needed to ensure timely generic entry of GLP-1 receptor agonists to the market.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2023.13872

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brand-name GLP-1 manufacturers have obtained a median of 19.5 patents per GLP-1 receptor agonist and secured a median of 18.3 years of expected protection, with more than half of all patents obtained on delivery devices rather than active ingredients.

    “Research has shown that brand-name GLP-1 manufacturers have obtained a median of 19.5 patents per GLP-1 receptor agonist and secured a median of 18.3 years of expected protection, with more than half of all patents obtained on the delivery devices rather than active ingredients [24].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alhiary, R., Kesselheim, A. S., Gabriele, S., Beall, R. F., Tu, S. S., & Feldman, W. B.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • West Virginia University (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2023-08-15
Volume
330
Issue
7
Pages
650
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4385330768
Cited by
67
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 2
FWCI
13.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Gilead Sciences
  • West Virginia University
  • Arnold Ventures
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K08HL163246)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, patents, regulatory exclusivity, market exclusivity, generic drug entry, type 2 diabetes, drug delivery devices, patent law reform
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Commerce, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Economic Competition, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Patents as Topic, Therapeutic Equivalency, Time Factors, United States, Drugs, Generic, Drug Approval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review