Cited by 16Research Data Management PracticesAcademic Publishing and Open AccessPharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Sharing of Individual Patient-Level Data by Trialists of Randomized Clinical Trials of Pharmacological Treatments for COVID-19

Open access
Esmail, Laura C., Kapp, Philipp, Assi, Rouba, Wood, Julie, Regan, Gabriela, Ravaud, Philippe, Boutron, Isabelle·2023·JAMA

Abstract

This study describes access to individual patient-level data from randomized clinical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic to determine whether the intent to share what was reported in the registry, publication, or preprint was consistent with actual data access.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2023.4590

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among 224 randomised trials of interventions for covid-19, 68 (30%) reported in a trial registry the intention to share data, but only 50 (22%) actually shared individual patient data upon request or in a repository.

    “For example, among 224 randomised trials of interventions for covid-19, 68 (30%) reported in a trial registry the intention to share data, but only 50 (22%) actually shared individual patient data upon request or in a repository.96”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Esmail, L. C., Kapp, P., Assi, R., Wood, J., Regan, G., Ravaud, P., & Boutron, I.
Affiliations
  • Université Paris Cité (FR)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Vivli (US)
Corresponding author
Esmail, Laura C.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2023-05-16
Volume
329
Issue
19
Pages
1695
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4362507243
Cited by
16
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
  • Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  • Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Keywords
individual patient data, data sharing, COVID-19 pandemic, randomized controlled trials, pharmacotherapy, data access, clinical trial registries, preprints
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Information Dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review