Cited by 41COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Interventions for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19: a living mapping of research and living network meta-analysis

Open access
Boutron, Isabelle, Chaimani, Anna, Devane, Declan, Meerpohl, Joerg J, Rada, Gabriel, Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn, Tovey, David, Grasselli, Giacomo +1 more·2020·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Interventions for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19: a living mapping of research and living network

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd013769

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy (HIA), France 25.The Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies (CAMARADES), Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Scotland 26.Cochrane Editorial and Methods Department, Cochrane Central 27.Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Italy 28.Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council 29.Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina, Greece 30.Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  2. Boutron I, Chaimani A, Meerpohl JJ, Hróbjartsson A, Devane D, Rada G, et al. The COVID-NMA Project: Building an Evidence Ecosystem for the COVID-19 Pandemic. Annals of Internal Medicine 2020;167:40-47.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boutron, I., Chaimani, A., Devane, D., Meerpohl, J. J., Rada, G., Hróbjartsson, A., Tovey, D., Grasselli, G., & Ravaud, P.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Department of Internal Medicine and Evidence-Based Healthcare Program, Faculty of Medicine; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Santiago Chile
  • Odense University Hospital (DK)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-11-03
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W3097110943
Cited by
41
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 prevention, COVID-19 treatment, intervention, SARS-CoV-2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review