The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
A comparison of methods for the estimation of plasma low- and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study
Abstract
Using data from over 10 000 men, women, and children who participated in the Lipid Research Clinics prevalence studies, we have examined the formula adopted by Friedewald et al for estimating plasma or serum concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) when (for economy, or in the absence of an ultracentrifuge) only fasting total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglyceride (TG) concentrations are measured in milligrams per liter, ie, LDL-C = TC-(HDL-C + 0.20 X TG). Values for LDL-C obtained by use of the Friedewald formula were compared with values derived from the Lipid Research Clinics ultracentrifugal procedure for LDL-C, which was used as a reference. Participants who were pregnant, who had not fasted, or whose plasma contained chylomicrons or floating beta-lipoproteins were excluded. We concluded that a better estimator for LDL-C was provided by the equation LDL-C = TC-(HDL-C + 0.16 X TG), since it produced an error (relative to the reference method) of lesser magnitude than the previous formula. The expression 0.16 X TG (0.37 X TG when measurements are reported in millimoles per liter) also produced a more accurate estimate of very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol relative to values obtained by the standard Lipid Research Clinics procedure for this component. The proposed formula is more precise for plasmas or sera with a TG concentration within the normal range.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Martin, S. S., Blaha, M. J., Elshazly, M. B., Toth, P. P., Kwiterovich, P. O., Blumenthal, R. S., & Jones, S. R. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.280532 · Cited by 883
Martin, S. S., Blaha, M. J., Elshazly, M. B., Brinton, E. A., Toth, P. P., McEvoy, J. W., Joshi, P. H., Kulkarni, K. R., Mize, P. D., Kwiterovich, P. O., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.079 · Cited by 428
Administration of Nasal Nafarelin as Compared with Oral Danazol for Endometriosis
Henzl, M. R., Corson, S. L., Moghissi, K., Buttram, V. C., Berqvist, C., & Jacobson, J. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198802253180805 · Cited by 361
Torres-Duran, P. V., Ferreira-Hermosillo, A., & Juarez-Oropeza, M. A. (2007) · Lipids in Health and Disease · doi:10.1186/1476-511x-6-33 · Cited by 181
Soffer, D. E., Marston, N. A., Maki, K. C., Jacobson, T. A., Bittner, V. A., Peña, J. M., Thanassoulis, G., Martin, S. S., Kirkpatrick, C. F., Virani, S. S., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Lipidology · doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2024.08.013 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- DeLong, D. M.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1986-11-07
- Volume
- 256
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2372-2377
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4248719387
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of methods for the estimation of plasma low- and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.256.17.2372
- The paper
- DeLong, D. M. (1986). A comparison of methods for the estimation of plasma low- and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.256.17.2372
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.