The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
End-stage renal disease in African-American and white men. 16-year MRFIT findings
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine reasons for the 4-fold higher incidence of treated end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in African-American men compared with white men. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Men screened in 1973 through 1975 for entry into the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 332544 men (300645 white, 20222 African American, and 11677 other ethnic groups) aged 35 to 57 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of ESRD assessed through 1990 using the Health Care Financing Administration national ESRD treatment registry and by surveillance for death from renal disease from data of the National Death Index and the Social Security Administration. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 16 years, age-adjusted ESRD incidence was 13.90 per 100000 person-years in white men and 44.22 per 100000 person-years in African-American men. Higher blood pressure and lower socioeconomic status were associated with higher incidence of ESRD in both ethnic groups. With adjustment for baseline age, systolic blood pressure, number of cigarettes smoked, previous myocardial infarction, diabetes, income, and serum cholesterol level, relative risk of ESRD in African-American men compared with white men was reduced from 3.20 to 1.87 (95% confidence interval, 1.47-2.39). Both higher systolic blood pressure and lower income in African-American men as compared with white men were particularly related to this reduced relative risk. Results were similar when hypertensive ESRD was used as the outcome. CONCLUSION: Both higher blood pressure and lower income are associated with a higher incidence of ESRD in both white and African-American men. Disparities in blood pressure and socioeconomic status relate importantly to the excess risk of ESRD in African-American men compared with white men.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cifkova, R., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc · Cited by 5,655
Age Affects Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease
O'Hare, A. M., Choi, A. I., Bertenthal, D., Bacchetti, P., Garg, A. X., Kaufman, J. S., Walter, L. C., Mehta, K. M., Steinman, M. A., Allon, M., et al. (2007) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2007040422 · Cited by 747
(1999) · Blood Pressure · doi:10.1080/08037059943973313 · Cited by 720
MYH9 is associated with nondiabetic end-stage renal disease in African Americans
on behalf of the Family Investigation of Nephropathy and Diabetes (FIND) Research Group, Kao, W. H. L., Klag, M. J., Meoni, L. A., Reich, D., Berthier-Schaad, Y., Li, M., Coresh, J., Patterson, N., Tandon, A., et al. (2008) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.232 · Cited by 649
Self-citationLash, J. P., Go, A. S., Appel, L. J., He, J., Ojo, A., Rahman, M., Townsend, R. R., Xie, D., Cifelli, D., Cohan, J., et al. (2009) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.00070109 · Cited by 619
Metadata
- Authors
- Klag, M. J.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-04-23
- Volume
- 277
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1293
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4254837986
- Cited by
- 612
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: End-stage renal disease in African-American and white men. 16-year MRFIT findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.277.16.1293
- The paper
- Klag, M. J. (1997). End-stage renal disease in African-American and white men. 16-year MRFIT findings. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.277.16.1293
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.