The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Epidural vs Parenteral Opioid Analgesia on the Progress of Labor: A Meta-analysis
Abstract
CONTEXT: Epidural labor analgesia, if selected by the patient, is associated with high cesarean delivery rates. Results of randomized trials comparing rates of cesarean delivery using epidural anesthesia vs parenteral opioids are inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: To review the effects of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on cesarean delivery rates. DATA SOURCES: Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE from January 1966 through January 1998, the Cochrane Database of Perinatal Trials, and relevant nonindexed journals and abstracts. STUDY SELECTION: We included all studies that randomized patients to epidural vs parenteral opioid labor analgesia. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently extracted data from 10 trials enrolling 2369 patients. Odds ratios (ORs) for categorical data, weighted mean differences (WMDs) for continuous data, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. DATA SYNTHESIS: The risk of cesarean delivery did not differ between patients receiving epidural (8.2%) vs parenteral opioid (5.6%) analgesia (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.81-2.76). Epidural patients had longer first (WMD, 42 minutes; 95% CI, 17-68 minutes) and second (WMD, 14 minutes; 95% CI, 5-23 minutes) labor stages. While epidural patients were more likely to have instrumented delivery (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.32-7.78), they were no more likely to have instrumented delivery for dystocia (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.31-1.49). After epidural analgesia, neonates were less likely to have low 5-minute Apgar scores (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.81) or to need naloxone (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.07-0.77). Women receiving epidural analgesia had lower pain scores during the first (WMD, -40 mm on a 100-mm scale; 95% CI, -42 to -38 mm) and second (WMD, -29 mm; 95% CI, -38 to -21 mm) stages of labor. The odds of dissatisfaction were lower with epidural analgesia (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.20-0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Epidural labor analgesia is not associated with increased rates of instrumented vaginal delivery for dystocia or cesarean delivery. Patients receiving epidural analgesia have longer labors. Patient satisfaction and neonatal outcome are better after epidural than parenteral opioid analgesia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 · Cited by 17,582
Cited by
Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour
Anim-Somuah, M., Smyth, R. M., & Jones, L. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000331.pub3 · Cited by 855
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour
Anim-Somuah, M., Smyth, R. M., Cyna, A. M., & Cuthbert, A. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000331.pub4 · Cited by 643
Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews
Jones, L., Othman, M., Dowswell, T., Alfirevic, Z., Gates, S., Newburn, M., Jordan, S., Lavender, T., & Neilson, J. P. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009234.pub2 · Cited by 608
The Risk of Cesarean Delivery with Neuraxial Analgesia Given Early versus Late in Labor
Wong, C. A., Scavone, B. M., Peaceman, A. M., McCarthy, R. J., Sullivan, J. T., Diaz, N. T., Yaghmour, E., Marcus, R.-J. L., Sherwani, S. S., Sproviero, M. T., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa042573 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Halpern, S. H., Leighton, B. L., Ohlsson, A., Barrett, J. F. R., & Rice, A.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-12-23
- Volume
- 280
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2105
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1986739121
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Epidural vs Parenteral Opioid Analgesia on the Progress of Labor: A Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.280.24.2105
- The paper
- Halpern, S. H., Leighton, B. L., Ohlsson, A., Barrett, J. F. R., & Rice, A. (1998). Effect of Epidural vs Parenteral Opioid Analgesia on the Progress of Labor: A Meta-analysis. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.24.2105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.