The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Risk of Cesarean Delivery with Neuraxial Analgesia Given Early versus Late in Labor
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia initiated early in labor (when the cervix is less than 4.0 cm dilated) has been associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. It is unclear, however, whether this increase in risk is due to the analgesia or is attributable to other factors. METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial of 750 nulliparous women at term who were in spontaneous labor or had spontaneous rupture of the membranes and who had a cervical dilatation of less than 4.0 cm. Women were randomly assigned to receive intrathecal fentanyl or systemic hydromorphone at the first request for analgesia. Epidural analgesia was initiated in the intrathecal group at the second request for analgesia and in the systemic group at a cervical dilatation of 4.0 cm or greater or at the third request for analgesia. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery. RESULTS: The rate of cesarean delivery was not significantly different between the groups (17.8 percent after intrathecal analgesia vs. 20.7 percent after systemic analgesia; 95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -9.0 to 3.0 percentage points; P=0.31). The median time from the initiation of analgesia to complete dilatation was significantly shorter after intrathecal analgesia than after systemic analgesia (295 minutes vs. 385 minutes, P<0.001), as was the time to vaginal delivery (398 minutes vs. 479 minutes, P<0.001). Pain scores after the first intervention were significantly lower after intrathecal analgesia than after systemic analgesia (2 vs. 6 on a 0-to-10 scale, P<0.001). The incidence of one-minute Apgar scores below 7 was significantly higher after systemic analgesia (24.0 percent vs. 16.7 percent, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Neuraxial analgesia in early labor did not increase the rate of cesarean delivery, and it provided better analgesia and resulted in a shorter duration of labor than systemic analgesia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thorp, J. A., Hu, D. H., Albin, R. M., McNitt, J., Meyer, B. A., Cohen, G. R., & Yeast, J. D. (1993) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(93)90015-b · Cited by 444
Epidural Analgesia, Intrapartum Fever, and Neonatal Sepsis Evaluation
Lieberman, E., Lang, J. M., Frigoletto, F., Richardson, D. K., Ringer, S. A., & Cohen, A. (1997) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.99.3.415 · Cited by 328
Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women
Seyb, S. (1999) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00377-4 · Cited by 322
(2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)05251-x · Cited by 308
Effect of Epidural vs Parenteral Opioid Analgesia on the Progress of Labor: A Meta-analysis
Halpern, S. H., Leighton, B. L., Ohlsson, A., Barrett, J. F. R., & Rice, A. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.24.2105 · Cited by 264
Nageotte, M. P., Larson, D., Rumney, P. J., Sidhu, M., & Hollenbach, K. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199712113372402 · Cited by 214
Chestnut, D. H., McGrath, J. M., Vincent, R. D., Penning, D. H., Choi, W. W., Bates, J. N., & McFarlane, C. (1994) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-199406000-00006 · Cited by 183
Fetal bradycardia due to intrathecal opioids for labour analgesia: a systematic review
Mardirosoff, C., Dumont, L., Boulvain, M., & Tramèr, M. R. (2002) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01380.x · Cited by 178
Sharma, S. K., Alexander, J. M., Messick, G., Bloom, S. L., McIntire, D. D., Wiley, J., & Leveno, K. J. (2002) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-200203000-00007 · Cited by 164
Chestnut, D. H., Vincent, R. D., McGrath, J. M., Choi, W. W., & Bates, J. N. (1994) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-199406000-00005 · Cited by 163
Cited by
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour
Anim-Somuah, M., Smyth, R. M., & Jones, L. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000331.pub3 · Cited by 855
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour
Anim-Somuah, M., Smyth, R. M., Cyna, A. M., & Cuthbert, A. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000331.pub4 · Cited by 643
A Decade of Reversal: An Analysis of 146 Contradicted Medical Practices
Prasad, V., Vandross, A., Toomey, C., Cheung, M., Rho, J., Quinn, S., Chacko, S. J., Borkar, D., Gall, V., Selvaraj, S., et al. (2013) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.05.012 · Cited by 381
Obstetric Anesthesia Workforce Survey: Twenty-year Update
Bucklin, B. A., Hawkins, J. L., Anderson, J. R., & Ullrich, F. A. (2005) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-200509000-00030 · Cited by 323
Parenteral opioids for maternal pain management in labour
Ullman, R., Smith, L. A., Burns, E., Mori, R., & Dowswell, T. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007396.pub2 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, C. A., Scavone, B. M., Peaceman, A. M., McCarthy, R. J., Sullivan, J. T., Diaz, N. T., Yaghmour, E., Marcus, R.-J. L., Sherwani, S. S., Sproviero, M. T., Yilmaz, M., Patel, R., Robles, C., & Grouper, S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2005-02-17
- Volume
- 352
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 655-665
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W1971558598
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 21.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Risk of Cesarean Delivery with Neuraxial Analgesia Given Early versus Late in Labor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa042573
- The paper
- Wong, C. A., Scavone, B. M., Peaceman, A. M., McCarthy, R. J., Sullivan, J. T., Diaz, N. T., Yaghmour, E., Marcus, R.-J. L., Sherwani, S. S., Sproviero, M. T., Yilmaz, M., Patel, R., Robles, C., & Grouper, S. (2005). The Risk of Cesarean Delivery with Neuraxial Analgesia Given Early versus Late in Labor. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa042573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.