The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Resolving the Gatekeeper Conundrum: What Patients Value in Primary Care and Referrals to Specialists
Abstract
CONTEXT: Few data are available regarding how patients view the role of primary care physicians as "gatekeepers" in managed care systems. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which patients value the role of their primary care physicians as first-contact care providers and coordinators of referrals, whether patients perceive that their primary care physicians impede access to specialists, and whether problems in gaining access to specialists are associated with a reduction in patients' trust and confidence in their primary care physicians. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Cross-sectional survey mailed in the fall of 1997 to 12707 adult patients who were members of managed care plans and received care from 10 large physician groups in California. The response rate among eligible patients was 71%. A total of 7718 patients (mean age, 66.7 years; 32 % female) were eligible for analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Questionnaire items addressed 3 main topics: (1) patient attitudes toward the first-contact and coordinating role of their primary care physicians, (2) patients' ratings of their primary care physicians (trust and confidence in and satisfaction with), and (3) patient perceptions of barriers to specialty referrals. Referral barriers were analyzed as predictors of patients' ratings of their physicians. RESULTS: Almost all patients valued the role of a primary care physician as a source of first-contact care (94%) and coordinator of referrals (89%). Depending on the specific medical problem, 75% to 91% of patients preferred to seek care initially from their primary care physicians rather than specialists. Twenty-three percent reported that their primary care physicians or medical groups interfered with their ability to see specialists. Patients who had difficulty obtaining referrals were more likely to report low trust (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-3.5), low confidence (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6-2.9), and low satisfaction (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.6-4.2) with their primary care physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Patients value the first-contact and coordinating role of primary care physicians. However, managed care policies that emphasize primary care physicians as gatekeepers impeding access to specialists undermine patients' trust and confidence in their primary care physicians.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Empirical Foundations of Telemedicine Interventions in Primary Care
Bashshur, R. L., Howell, J. D., Krupinski, E. A., Harms, K. M., Bashshur, N., & Doarn, C. R. (2016) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2016.0045 · Cited by 370
Primary Care — Will It Survive?
Bodenheimer, T. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp068155 · Cited by 384
Dropping the Baton: Specialty Referrals in the United States
MEHROTRA, A., FORREST, C. B., & LIN, C. Y. (2011) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00619.x · Cited by 373
Katon, W., Von Korff, M., Lin, E., & Simon, G. (2001) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0163-8343(01)00136-0 · Cited by 313
Eisenberg, J. M., & Power, E. J. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.16.2100 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Grumbach, K., Selby, J. V., Damberg, C., Bindman, A. B., Quesenberry, Jr., Truman, A., & Uratsu, C.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1999-07-21
- Volume
- 282
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 261
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2087816928
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 50.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resolving the Gatekeeper Conundrum: What Patients Value in Primary Care and Referrals to Specialists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.282.3.261
- The paper
- Grumbach, K., Selby, J. V., Damberg, C., Bindman, A. B., Quesenberry, Jr., Truman, A., & Uratsu, C. (1999). Resolving the Gatekeeper Conundrum: What Patients Value in Primary Care and Referrals to Specialists. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.3.261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.