Cited by 158Healthcare Policy and ManagementHealthcare Systems and ReformsHealthcare Quality and Management

Transforming Insurance Coverage Into Quality Health Care: Voltage Drops From Potential to Delivered Quality

Eisenberg, John M., Power, Elaine J.·2000·JAMA

Abstract

Although the US health care system is often touted as one of the best in the world, disparities exist in quality of care received by different populations, in different regions, and across different institutions and clinicians. Initiatives to provide access to health insurance have been a major policy tool to ensure that Americans receive high-quality health care. However, availability of insurance coverage does not automatically lead to high-quality care. This article explores points of vulnerability in the US health care system at which the potential to achieve high-quality care can be lost: (1) access to insurance coverage; (2) enrollment in available insurance plans; (3) access to covered services, clinicians, and health care institutions; (4) choice of plans, clinicians, and health care institutions; (5) access to a consistent source of primary care; (6) access to referral services; and (7) delivery of high-quality health care services. Ensuring high-quality health care requires that each of these "voltage drops" be recognized and addressed. JAMA. 2000;284:2100-2107.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.284.16.2100

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Receiving developmental support services is the last in a series of steps from screening to referral to evaluation to delivery, and each step is vulnerable to leakage ("voltage drops"), with disparities compounding throughout.

    “Receiving these services is the last in a series of steps from screening to referral to evaluation to delivery. Each step is vulnerable to leakage (“voltage drops”), with disparities compounding throughout.10–12”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eisenberg, J. M., & Power, E. J.
Affiliations
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2000-10-25
Volume
284
Issue
16
Pages
2100
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2048498021
Cited by
158
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
health insurance coverage, quality of care, health care disparities, insurance enrollment, health care access, primary care access, referral services, health care delivery, health policy
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Health Services Accessibility, Insurance, Health, Primary Health Care, Quality of Health Care, Referral and Consultation, United States, Insurance Coverage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review