The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Handheld Cellular Telephone Use and Risk of Brain Cancer
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: A relative paucity of data exist on the possible health effects of using cellular telephones. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that using handheld cellular telephones is related to the risk of primary brain cancer. DESIGN AND SETTING: Case-control study conducted in 5 US academic medical centers between 1994 and 1998 using a structured questionnaire. PATIENTS: A total of 469 men and women aged 18 to 80 years with primary brain cancer and 422 matched controls without brain cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Risk of brain cancer compared by use of handheld cellular telephones, in hours per month and years of use. RESULTS: The median monthly hours of use were 2.5 for cases and 2.2 for controls. Compared with patients who never used handheld cellular telephones, the multivariate odds ratio (OR) associated with regular past or current use was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-1.2). The OR for infrequent users (<0. 72 h/mo) was 1.0 (95% CI, 0.5-2.0) and for frequent users (>10.1 h/mo) was 0.7 (95% CI, 0.3-1.4). The mean duration of use was 2.8 years for cases and 2.7 years for controls; no association with brain cancer was observed according to duration of use (P =.54). In cases, cerebral tumors occurred more frequently on the same side of the head where cellular telephones had been used (26 vs 15 cases; P =.06), but in the cases with temporal lobe cancer a greater proportion of tumors occurred in the contralateral than ipsilateral side (9 vs 5 cases; P =.33). The OR was less than 1.0 for all histologic categories of brain cancer except for uncommon neuroepitheliomatous cancers (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.9-4.7). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that use of handheld cellular telephones is not associated with risk of brain cancer, but further studies are needed to account for longer induction periods, especially for slow-growing tumors with neuronal features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Epidemiology of Health Effects of Radiofrequency Exposure
ICNIRP (International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) Standing Committee on Epidemiology:, Ahlbom, A., Green, A., Kheifets, L., Savitz, D., & Swerdlow, A. (2004) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7306 · Cited by 350
Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study
Coureau, G., Bouvier, G., Lebailly, P., Fabbro-Peray, P., Gruber, A., Leffondre, K., Guillamo, J.-S., Loiseau, H., Mathoulin-Pélissier, S., Salamon, R., et al. (2014) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oemed-2013-101754 · Cited by 159
Little, M. P., Rajaraman, P., Curtis, R. E., Devesa, S. S., Inskip, P. D., Check, D. P., & Linet, M. S. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e1147 · Cited by 110
Mobile phone use and incidence of glioma in the Nordic countries 1979–2008: consistency check
Deltour, I., Auvinen, A., Feychting, M., Johansen, C., Klaeboe, L., Sankila, R., & Schüz, J. (2012) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e3182448295 · Cited by 105
Hardell, L., Carlberg, M., & Mild, K. H. (2006) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2005.04.006 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Muscat, J. E.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-12-20
- Volume
- 284
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 3001
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2153694112
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Handheld Cellular Telephone Use and Risk of Brain Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.284.23.3001
- The paper
- Muscat, J. E. (2000). Handheld Cellular Telephone Use and Risk of Brain Cancer. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.23.3001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.