The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-term Satisfaction and Psychological and Social Function Following Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
Abstract
CONTEXT: Prophylactic mastectomy is a preventive option for women who wish to reduce their risk of breast cancer. There has been concern about possible negative psychological sequelae following this procedure. However, few data are available regarding long-term satisfaction and psychological and social function following this procedure. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patients' long-term satisfaction and psychological and social function following prophylactic mastectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Descriptive study of all women known to be alive (n = 609) who had a family history of breast cancer and elected to undergo bilateral prophylactic mastectomy at a large, tertiary US health care clinic between 1960 and 1993, 94% (n = 572) of whom completed a study questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Satisfaction with procedure and effects on psychological and social function, based on responses to the study-specific questionnaire. RESULTS: Mean time from prophylactic mastectomy to last follow-up was 14.5 years. Most women (70%) were satisfied with the procedure; 11% were neutral; and 19% were dissatisfied. Among the psychological and social variables, the most striking finding was that 74% reported a diminished level of emotional concern about developing breast cancer. The majority of women reported no change/favorable effects in levels of emotional stability (68%/23%), level of stress (58%/28%), self-esteem (69%/13%), sexual relationships (73%/4%), and feelings of femininity (67%/8%). Forty-eight percent reported no change in their level of satisfaction with body appearance; 16% reported favorable effects. However, 9%, 14%, 18%, 23%, 25%, and 36% reported negative effects in these 6 variables, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that positive outcomes following prophylactic mastectomy include decreased emotional concern about developing breast cancer and generally favorable psychological and social outcomes. These must be weighed against the irreversibility of the decision, potential problems with implants and reconstructive surgery, and occurrence of adverse psychological and social outcomes in some women. JAMA. 2000;284:319-324
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies have shown that the majority of women undergoing PM experience reduced cancer worry post-surgery [Frost 2000] [Bresser 2006] [Geiger 2006]”
From Support needs and acceptability of psychological and peer consultation: Attitudes of 108 women who had undergone or were considering prophylactic mastectomy (2008) · cites this paper as Frost 2000
In the citing paper
“Studies have shown that the majority of women following PM reported decreased (hereditary) cancer related distress while other psychosocial functioning does not appear to be significantly affected in a negative way [5,8-10].”
From Standard psychological consultations and follow up for women at increased risk of hereditary breast cancer considering prophylactic mastectomy (2009) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
A Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Quality-of-Life Measurements
Gill, T. M. (1994) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520080061045 · Cited by 2,209
Efficacy of Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer
Hartmann, L. C., Schaid, D. J., Woods, J. E., Crotty, T. P., Myers, J. L., Arnold, P. G., Petty, P. M., Sellers, T. A., Johnson, J. L., McDonnell, S. K., et al. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199901143400201 · Cited by 1,428
Self-citationBRCA1 Testing in Families With Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer
Lerman, C. E. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530480027036 · Cited by 826
What Do Global Self-Rated Health Items Measure?
KRAUSE, N. M., & Jay, G. (1994) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199409000-00004 · Cited by 716
State of science 1986: Quality of life and functional status as target variables for research
Spitzer, W. O. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90002-6 · Cited by 335
Predictors of and Satisfaction with Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
Stefanek, M. E., Helzlsouer, K. J., Wilcox, P. M., & Houn, F. (1995) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1006/pmed.1995.1066 · Cited by 177
Research in cancer pain. What we know and what we need to know
Cleeland, C. S. (1991) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19910201)67:3+ · Cited by 102
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-4520 · Cited by 94
Patient regrets after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy
Borgen, P., Hill, A., Tran, K. N., Zee, K. V., Massie, M., Payne, D., & Biggs, C. (1998) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1007/bf02303829 · Cited by 93
Prophylactic mastectomy--the price of fear.
Eisen, A., & Weber, B. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199901143400209 · Cited by 69
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 321
Leistungsanspruch auf prophylaktische Behandlung bei genetischer Prädisposition für Brustkrebs
Meier, F., Ried, J., Harney, A., Rhiem, K., Neusser, S., Neumann, A., Wasem, J., Schmutzler, R. K., Huster, S., & Dabrock, P. (2017) · Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz · doi:10.1007/s00103-017-2608-8 · Cited by 6
When Treatment Affects Appearance
Williamson, H., & Wallace, M. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199580521.013.0030 · Cited by 6
Weitzel, J. N. (2015) · Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.soc.2015.06.011 · Cited by 6
Personalized medicine: The future is not what it used to be
Demeure, M. J. (2009) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.023 · Cited by 6
Local approaches to hereditary breast cancer.
Cooper, B., Murphy, J., Sacchini, V., & Formenti, S. C. (2013) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt327 · Cited by 6
“In a study of 609 women with a family history of breast cancer who elected to have a bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, regret was more often reported when the main reason for considering the procedure was the physician’s recommendation [41].”
BackgroundMadlensky, L., McLaughlin, J. R., Carroll, J. C., Goel, V., & Frank, J. W. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.003 · Cited by 6
“” For example, women from families at high risk for hereditary breast cancer who underwent prophylactic mastectomy in the absence of genetic test results have reported satisfaction with their decision, and in many cases, improved psychologic functioning and reduced worry [20,21].”
BackgroundRisk Factors and Health Promotion in Families of Patients With Breast Cancer
Conto, S. I. M., & Myers, J. S. (2002) · Clinical journal of oncology nursing · doi:10.1188/02.cjon.83-87 · Cited by 6
Grandi, G., Sammarini, M., Cortesi, L., Toss, A., Botticelli, L., Varliero, F., Sighinolfi, G., Barbieri, E., & Facchinetti, F. (2021) · Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society · doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000001737 · Cited by 5
Djohan, R. S., & Knackstedt, R. W. (2019) · The Breast Journal · doi:10.1111/tbj.13723 · Cited by 5
Sexual Health in the Era of Cancer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review
Yusufov, M., & Bober, S. L. (2020) · Sexual Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.11.003 · Cited by 5
Genetic Issues in Patients with Breast Cancer
Fossland, V. S., Stroop, J., Schwartz, R. C., & Kurtzman, S. H. (2008) · Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.soc.2008.08.008 · Cited by 5
Mandelblatt, J. S., & Selby, J. V. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511545856.010 · Cited by 5
Fletcher, R., Brough, G., Macmillan, D. R., Brock, L., Asgiersson, K., & Wilson, E. E. (2023) · International Journal of Health Promotion and Education · doi:10.1080/14635240.2023.2270480 · Cited by 4
“Whilst many women are satisfied with their decision to have risk-reducing surgery some will experience regret or adverse psychosocial effects (Frost et al. 2000; Payne et al. 2000).”
Khan, N., Wickman, M., & Schultz, I. (2024) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000005951 · Cited by 4
Fuller, S. L., & Anderson, R. C. (2006) · Plastic and Aesthetic Nursing · doi:10.1097/00006527-200604000-00004 · Cited by 4
Role of Breast Surgery in BRCA Mutation Carriers
Nestle-Krämling, C., & Kühn, T. (2012) · Breast Care · doi:10.1159/000343717 · Cited by 4
Blazer, K. R., MacDonald, D., Justus, K. A., GRANT, M. M., Azen, S. P., Chamberlain, R. M., Petersen, G. M., King, M. G., & Weitzel, J. N. (2007) · Journal of Cancer Education · doi:10.1080/08858190701347770 · Cited by 4
Hallowell, N., Heiniger, L. E., Baylock, B., Price, M. A., Butow, P. N., & kConFab Psychosocial Group on behal (2015) · Health Sociology Review · doi:10.1080/14461242.2014.999402 · Cited by 4
“While the long- to medium-term impacts of RRM on risk perception, gender identity, body image and sexuality have been well-documented (Frost et al., 2000; Hallowell et al., 2012), much less is known about women’s experiences of surgery and convalescence.”
BackgroundPsychological factors that influence decision making about prophylactic surgery
Fang, C. Y., Mckenzie, T., Miller, S. M., & Daly, M. B. (2005) · Complutensian Scientific Journals (Complutense University of Madrid) · doi:10.5209/rev_psic.2005.v2.n2.16890 · Cited by 4
Management of Women at High Familial Risk of Breast and Ovarian Cancer
Field, K., & Phillips, K. (2009) · IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks · doi:10.1142/9781848163652_0039 · Cited by 4
Abbott, A. M., & Tuttle, T. M. (2010) · Breast Diseases A Year Book Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1043-321x(10)79574-6 · Cited by 4
Immediate breast reconstruction: who is more satisfied, the surgeon or the patient?
Bruant-rodier, C., Mathelin, C., Rodier, J. F., Kjartansdóttir, T. H., & Meyer, N. (2004) · European Journal of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00238-003-0583-9 · Cited by 4
Джантемирова, Н. М., Akhmedin, D., Khassenov, D., Хакимова, Г. Г., Khakimova, S. G., Бекишева, А. Т., Mauletbayev, M., & Макишев, А. К. (2024) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.31557/apjcp.2024.25.1.9 · Cited by 3
“Unfortunately, intractable post-mastectomy pain negatively affects the quality of life for many patients [8, 9].”
BackgroundPrévention des cancers du sein : de la chimioprévention à la chirurgie prophylactique
Morcel, K., Rouquette, S., Dugast, C., Bendavid, C., Audrain, O., & Lévêque, J. (2008) · Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément/Journal de gynécologie obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction · doi:10.1016/j.jgyn.2008.05.013 · Cited by 3
Constructions of Decision Making for Risk-Reducing Mastectomy
Graham, R. H., Owens, M., Priest, H. M., & Hutton, S. (2018) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732318785372 · Cited by 3
The genetics of breast cancer, risk-reducing surgery and prevention
Evans, D. G., Kwong, A., & Baildam, A. D. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7020-4959-0.00008-4 · Cited by 3
Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer
Kim, S. (2009) · Journal of Korean Medical Association · doi:10.5124/jkma.2009.52.10.952 · Cited by 3
Bramlette, T. B., Lawson, D. H., Washington, C. V., Veledar, E., Johns, B., Brisman, S., Abramova, L., & Chen, S. C. (2007) · Dermatologic Surgery · doi:10.1097/00042728-200701000-00002 · Cited by 3
The Genetics of Breast and Gynecologic Cancers
Wilbur, J. S., Rojan, A. A., & Legare, R. D. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-032303247-6.10003-6 · Cited by 3
Bilateral mastectomy and the retreat from breast-conserving surgery
Moffat, F. L., & Yakoub, D. (2016) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-016-3909-6 · Cited by 4
“restoration of self-esteem in 12–18 % [27, 45, 54] and relief of psychic stress in 17–18 % related to future cancer concerns and living to see their families grow up [27, 45].”
BackgroundInfluentialMeier, F., Harney, A., Rhiem, K., Neusser, S., Neumann, A., Braun, M., Wasem, J., Huster, S., Dabrock, P., & Schmutzler, R. K. (2021) · Recent results in cancer research/Recent Results in Cancer Research · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63749-1_5 · Cited by 3
Gene screening and prevention of hereditary breast cancer
Klijn, J. G. M., & Meijers-Heijboer, H. E. J. (2003) · European Journal of Cancer Supplements · doi:10.1016/s1359-6349(03)00005-3 · Cited by 3
“Psychological studies of women who had undergone a prophylactic mastectomy did not find that, overall, the procedure had detrimental effects on body image and sexuality [87–90].”
BackgroundKomrower Lecture: New names for old disciplines
GALJAARD, H. (2002) · Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease · doi:10.1023/a:1015669626590 · Cited by 3
“More studies are needed to investigate the psychological e¡ects of DNA testing and its e⁄cacy and that of various preventive measures (Holtzman 1997; Frost et al 2000).”
BackgroundResnick, B. M., & Belcher, A. E. (2002) · AJN American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.1097/00000446-200204000-00017 · Cited by 3
Dickinson Brian, P., Vu‐Huynh, N., Vu Monica, B., Gregory, S., Pham, R. J., Patel, B. A., Holmes Dennis, R., Kelsey, S., Callahan, R., & Peter, A. (2021) · International Journal of Radiology and Radiation Oncology · doi:10.17352/ijrro.000045 · Cited by 2
“Autologous mastectomy reconstructions provide a natural consistency of the reconstructed breast with psychological benefi ts for the patient and are common in patients wishing to avoid implants and choosing to undergo mastectomy due to deleterious breast cancer gene mutations [4].”
BackgroundEthical implications of genetic testing of susceptibility to breast cancer
Neves, N. M. B. C., Bôaventura, C. S., Costa, M. A. F., & Bitencourt, A. G. V. (2022) · Revista Bioética · doi:10.1590/1983-80422022303557en · Cited by 2
“Genetic testing related to knowledge, attitudes and communication behavior is primary care in BC prevention, considering that it can inform stratified risk 14,15 .”
Surgical Management of High-Risk Patients
Rhei, E., Nixon, A. J., & Iglehart, J. D. (2001) · Breast Disease · doi:10.3233/bd-2001-12102 · Cited by 2
Psychological adjustment to breast cancer: a guide for physicians in primary care
Leake, C. A., & Dresner, N. (2001) · Primary Care Update for OB/GYNS · doi:10.1016/s1068-607x(01)00083-x · Cited by 2
Comparison of satisfactions from mastectomy and Lump Ectome in breast cancer patients
Tazhibi, M., Sarrafzadeh, S., Mokarian, F., Babazade, S., Tabatabaeian, M., Rezaei, P., Faghihi, M., & Taleghani, F. (2014) · Journal of Education and Health Promotion · doi:10.4103/2277-9531.127611 · Cited by 2
“Since, some women have less attention to their breasts and body image.[16] On the other hand, the observed differences between this study with other studies, especially foreign ones, may due to differences between cultures and religion in Iran society.”
ResultBreast Cancer: Genetics and Risk Assessment
Tejada‐Berges, T. (2016) · Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/grf.0000000000000236 · Cited by 2
“Overall, studies demonstrate a high level of satisfaction among women who choose a prophylactic mastectomy.(75) In a Dutch study of women who underwent prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction, 60% of participants were satisfied with the results of the surgery after a median follow-up of 3 years.”
BackgroundAustrian Gynecologic Oncology Working Group, Bjelic‐Radisic, V., Singer, C. F., Tamussino, K. F., KÖLBL, H., Petru, E., Volgger, B., Polterauer, S., Oppelt, P., Sevelda, P., et al. (2019) · Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · doi:10.1007/s00508-019-1468-7 · Cited by 2
“Of women undergoing reconstruction 20–30% found that the cosmetic outcome, sexuality and breast sensitivity were lower than they had expected [27, 28].”
BackgroundSexual Health and Body Image After Breast Cancer
Hungr, C., & Bober, S. L. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-24762-1_14 · Cited by 2
O perfil da sexualidade em mulheres com câncer de mama
Maluf, M. F. D. M. (2008) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/d.5.2008.tde-25062008-120439 · Cited by 2
Issues in Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
Bucholtz, J. D., Tranin, A. S., Mancino, A. T., Henry‐Tillman, R., Westbrook, K. C., & McCarthy, M. C. (2001) · Cancer Practice · doi:10.1046/j.1523-5394.2001.91003.x · Cited by 2
Pr�diktive Humangenetische Diagnostik bei heredit�rem Mamma- und Kolorektalkarzinom
Jonas, I. S., Schamberger, C., & Wild, I. C. (2006) · doi:10.1553/ita-pb-b21 · Cited by 2
Ryan, P. D., Haber, D. A., Shannon, K. M., Smith, B. L., & Fan, M. J. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcpc030018 · Cited by 2
Primäre und sekundäre Prävention
Albert, U., & Schulz, K. D. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-08460-1_8 · Cited by 2
Jayasinghe, V., & Nandasena, S. (2018) · International Journal of Advanced Community Medicine · doi:10.33545/comed.2018.v1.i3a.24 · Cited by 1
Prophylactic Mastectomy: Who Benefits
Petsalis, M., & Kruper, L. L. (2026) · Current Breast Cancer Reports · doi:10.1007/s12609-026-00642-4 · Cited by 1
Bilateral Breast Reconstruction and the Role of Prophylactic Mastectomy
MacLennan, S. E. (2002) · Breast Disease · doi:10.3233/bd-2002-16105 · Cited by 1
“This finding may be mostly attributable to anxiety reduction, since the satisfaction rate was higher in those who did not have reconstruction [17].”
Baildam, A. D. (2006) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/s0960-9776(07)70013-9 · Cited by 1
Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Surgical Prevention for Breast Cancer
Leach, C. M., & Collins, M. S. (2018) · Current Breast Cancer Reports · doi:10.1007/s12609-018-0283-x · Cited by 1
Implicações éticas dos testes genéticos de suscetibilidade ao câncer de mama
Neves, N. M. B. C., Bôaventura, C. S., Costa, M. A. F., & Bitencourt, A. G. V. (2022) · Revista Bioética · doi:10.1590/1983-80422022303557pt · Cited by 1
Seki, T., Kobayashi, Y., Masuda, K., Nakamura, K., Yamada, M., Goto, Y., Misu, K., Ono, I., Nagayama, A., Hayashida, T., et al. (2025) · The Keio Journal of Medicine · doi:10.2302/kjm.2024-0021-re · Cited by 1
État de l’art des recommandations actuelles pour la chirurgie prophylactique
Pujol, P. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-2-8178-0245-9_3 · Cited by 1
Psychosocial, Ethical, and Legal Implications for Mutation Carriers
Powers, J. M., Long, J. M., & Mendonca, W. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59198-8_12 · Cited by 1
Surgical Options for Primary Prevention: Prophylactic Mastectomy and Oophorectomy
Murphy, J. O., & Sacchini, V. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41207-4_18 · Cited by 1
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Current Perspectives
Yao, K. A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60336-0_3 · Cited by 1
The Surgeon's Role in Breast Cancer Chemoprevention
Brinkmann, E., & Morrow, M. (2001) · Breast Disease · doi:10.3233/bd-2001-12111 · Cited by 1
“Adverse psychological effects are observed in as many as 30% of those women who have the operation [1].”
BackgroundPsychosocial implications of prophylactic surgical intervention for ovarian cancer
Garofalo, J. P., & Baum, A. E. (2003) · Current Opinion in Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00001504-200303000-00011 · Cited by 1
The Association of Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Care: Theory, Evidence, and ApplicationPreprint
Chen, Y., Im, T., Shaik, M., Bosukonda, N., Singh, S., Blut, M., Mittal, V., Sridhar, S., & Singal, A. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3970182 · Cited by 1
Hopwood, P. (2003) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000046248.89323.46 · Cited by 1
Walsh, J., Dolan, N., & Charney, P. (2000) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-133-10-200011210-00014
“In a separate descriptive study, most women expressed satisfaction with their decision to undergo prophylactic mastectomy, had decreased concern about developing breast cancer, and had generally favorable psychological and social outcomes (9).”
BackgroundGil, F., & Costa‐Requena, G. (2005) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.5209/rev_psic.2005.v2.n2.16881
Pluchinotta, A. M., Saguatti, G., & Zuccarello, D. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15907-2_2
Prädiktoren der Untersuchungsintention bei hereditärem Mamma- und Ovarialkarzinomrisiko
Worringen, U., & Faller, H. (2003) · Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie · doi:10.3233/zmp-2003-12_4_02
Genetic Susceptibility to Female Cancers
Crawford, G. (2011) · doi:10.1002/9781118786635.ch5
BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Breast Cancer and Ovarian Cancer
Cassidy, M. R., & Mendez, J. E. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1423-4_6
“Dissatisfaction, although rare, was more common when a physician’s advice was the motivating factor to pursue prophylactic surgery, rather than the initiative of the patient [ 64 ].”
BackgroundIdentification and Management of Women at High Familial Risk for Breast Cancer
Kurian, A. W., & Ford, J. M. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6076-4_13
Response to ethical dissections of the case
Lucassen, A. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511545450.014
Present standards and future concepts of surgery in breast cancer
Tuttle, T. M., & Rueth, N. M. (2012) · Hamdan Medical Journal · doi:10.7707/hmj.v5i1.105
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction
Mir, R., Singh, V. P., & Sodhi, P. (2008) · Apollo Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0976-0016(11)60477-8
Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: Who Is a Candidate and What Are the Outcomes?
Newman, L. A. (2013) · Current Breast Cancer Reports · doi:10.1007/s12609-013-0110-3
Surgical Management of Inherited Susceptibility to Breast Cancer
Freisinger, F., & Domchek, S. M. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-87583-5_4
The Optimization of Breast Conservation
Dooley, W. C., Keshtgar, M., Tot, T., Yamamoto, D., & El-Tamer, M. B. (2011) · International Journal of Breast Cancer · doi:10.4061/2011/456378
E14. Changing concepts in breast cancer surgery
Cody, H. S. (2004) · European Journal of Cancer Supplements · doi:10.1016/s1359-6349(04)90595-2
Crump, M. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.42.9423
BILATERAL PROPHYLACTIC MASTECTOMY AND IMMEDIATE BREAST RECONSTRUCTION WITH IMPLANTS
Gahm, J. (2009) · Figshare
Breast conserving surgery and radiation as a choice for patients with BRCA mutations
Pinto, C., Kotinsley, K., & Trombetta, M. (2012) · Journal of Solid Tumors · doi:10.5430/jst.v2n5p45 · Cited by 1
The Psychosocial Impact of Prophylactic Mastectomy and Salpingo-Oophorectomy
Bresser, P. J. C. (2009) · RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam)
Prise en charge par le chirurgien d’une élévation du risque de cancer du sein
Bonnier, P., Coscas, Y., Eisinger, F., Fourquet, A., Jacquemier, J. D., Lesur, A., Séror, J.-Y., Villet, R., & Pujol, P. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-2-287-71478-8_9
Women Report Satisfaction After Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
Berg, C. (2000) · Journal watch · doi:10.1056/wh200011130000002
Bleret, V., Cusumano, P. G., Dezfoulian, B., Nardella, D., Nizet, J.-L., Cauwenberge, J.-R. V., & Lifrange, É. (2011) · RMLG. Revue médicale de Liège
What is the Psychological Impact of Prophylactic Mastectomy
Tucker, G. F. (2000) · Journal watch · doi:10.1056/jp200008220000004
Estabrook, A. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-22532-6_96
Quelle transmission du féminin quand la génétique s’en mêle ?
Diricq, C. (2020) · Frontières · doi:10.7202/1073912ar
Tran, G., Helm, M., & Litton, J. K. (2016) · Current Breast Cancer Reports · doi:10.1007/s12609-016-0220-9
CÂNCER DE MAMA: PROFILAXIA POR MASTECTOMIA NA PRESENÇA DE ALTERAÇÕES DOS GENES BRCA1 E BRCA2
Maia, C. S., Nóbrega, J. R., Sousa, P. M. S., Roseno, D. A., Júnior, M. A. D., & Maciel, G. E. D. S. (2016) · REVISTA SAÚDE & CIÊNCIA · doi:10.35572/rsc.v5i2.374
A discursive analysis of accounts of breast cancer screening, risk and prevention
Crabb, S. (2006) · Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)
Prophylactic Mastectomy: still a controversial procedure?
Vaz, F. (2013) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)
Gordon, M. (1967) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3026-9.50014-5
Risk-Reducing Breast and Ovarian Surgery for Women at High Familial Risk
Schultz, I., & Sandelin, K. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56673-3_7
y Cajal, T. R., Manrique, A. C. V., & Dueñas, N. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56673-3_41
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Lostumbo, L., Carbine, N. E., & Wallace, J. (2004)
The lived experience of prophylactic total gastrectomy: a phenomenological inquiry
Hodge, J. (2016) · Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)
Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients with Atypical Breast Lesions
Boughey, J. C., & Degnim, A. C. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92657-5_11
Managing Susceptibility to Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer
Perry, C. K. (2005) · Digital USD (University of San Diego) · doi:10.22371/07.2005.08
Are craniofacial skeletal indices an independent risk factor for temporomandibular joint disorders?
Sertel, M. S., & Goller, B. D. (2020) · International Journal of Radiology and Radiation Oncology · doi:10.17352/ijrro.000040
“Our experience is similar to that encountered nationally where patients with a high body mass index have a high satisfaction rate with autologous fl ap reconstruction [3-5].”
MethodProphylactic Surgery: Why, When, and How?
Dılek, O. N. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-66853-2_1 · Cited by 1
“Education and psychological support of patients and families can provide better diagnosis and treatment [91, 92].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Frost, M. H.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Frost, Marlene H.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-07-19
- Volume
- 284
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 319
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2104836626
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (R01-80181)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Breast Implant and Reconstruction
- Keywords
- prophylactic mastectomy, bilateral mastectomy, breast cancer prevention, patient satisfaction, psychological outcomes, social functioning, self-esteem, body image, family history of breast cancer, long-term outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Mastectomy, Middle Aged, Social Behavior, Linear Models, Patient Satisfaction, Statistics, Nonparametric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review