Cited by 1,132Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pervasive Developmental Disorders in Preschool Children

Abstract

CONTEXT: Prevalence rates of autism-spectrum disorders are uncertain, and speculation that their incidence is increasing continues to cause concern. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs) in a geographically defined population of preschool children. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Survey conducted July 1998 to June 1999 in Staffordshire, England. The area's 15 500 children aged 2.5 to 6.5 years were screened for developmental problems. Children with symptoms suggestive of a PDD were intensively assessed by a multidisciplinary team, which conducted standardized diagnostic interviews and administered psychometric tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prevalence estimates for subtypes of PDDs. RESULTS: A total of 97 children (79.4% male) were confirmed to have a PDD. The prevalence of PDDs was estimated to be 62.6 (95% confidence interval, 50.8-76.3) per 10 000 children. Prevalences were 16.8 per 10 000 for autistic disorder and 45.8 per 10 000 for other PDDs. The mean age at diagnosis was 41 months, and 81% were originally referred by health visitors (nurse specialists). Of the 97 children with a PDD, 25.8% had some degree of mental retardation and 9.3% had an associated medical condition. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that rates of PDD are higher than previously reported. Methodological limitations in existing epidemiological investigations preclude interpretation of recent high rates as indicative of increased incidence of these disorders although this hypothesis requires further rigorous testing. Attention is nevertheless drawn to the important needs of a substantial minority of preschool children.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.285.24.3093

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,132

Metadata

Authors
Chakrabarti, S.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Chakrabarti, Suniti
Venue
JAMA
Published
2001-06-27
Volume
285
Issue
24
Pages
3093
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2071090844
Cited by
1,132
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 76
FWCI
32.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
pervasive developmental disorders, autism spectrum disorder, prevalence, preschool children, autistic disorder, incidence trends, age at diagnosis, intellectual disability, comorbidities, Staffordshire
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, England, Female, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review