Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 549

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epstein-Barr Virus Antibodies and Risk of Multiple Sclerosis: A Prospective Study

Open access
Ascherio, Alberto, Munger, Kassandra L., Lennette, Evelyne T., Spiegelman, Donna, Hernán, Miguel A., Olek, Michael J., Hankinson, Susan E., Hunter, David J.·2001·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Epidemiological studies suggest an association between infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and risk of multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether elevation in serum antibody titers to EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA), nuclear antigens (EBNA, EBNA-1, and EBNA-2), and diffuse and restricted early antigen (EA-D and EA-R) as well as to cytomegalovirus (CMV) precede the occurrence of MS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: Prospective, nested case-control study. Of 62 439 women participating in the Nurses' Health Study (aged 30-55 years in 1976) and Nurses' Health Study II (aged 25-42 years in 1989) who gave blood samples in 1989-1990 and 1996-1999, respectively, and were followed up through 1999, 144 women with definite or probable MS and 288 healthy age-matched controls were included in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Serum antibody titers to the specific EBV and CMV antigens, compared between cases and controls. RESULTS: We documented 18 cases of MS with blood collected before disease onset. Compared with their matched controls, these women had higher serum geometric mean titers (GMTs) of antibodies to EBV but not CMV. Elevations were significant for antibodies to EBNA-1 (GMT, 515 vs 203; P =.03), EBNA-2 (GMT, 91 vs 40; P =.01), and EA-D (15.9 vs 5.9; P =.04). The strongest association was found for antibodies to EBNA-2; a 4-fold difference in titers was associated with a relative risk (RR) of MS of 3.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-13.7). The corresponding RRs were 1.6 (95% CI, 0.7-3.7) for VCA, 2.5 (95% CI, 1.0-6.3) for EBNA, 1.8 (95% CI, 1.0-3.1) for EA-D, and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.6-1.7) for CMV. Significant but generally weaker elevations in anti-EBV antibodies were also found in analyses of 126 cases of MS with blood collected after disease onset and their matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support a role of EBV in the etiology of MS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.286.24.3083

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 549

Metadata

Authors
Ascherio, A., Munger, K. L., Lennette, E. T., Spiegelman, D., Hernán, M. A., Olek, M. J., Hankinson, S. E., & Hunter, D. J.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2001-12-26
Volume
286
Issue
24
Pages
3083
ISSN
0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2019009797
Cited by
549
References
37
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epstein-Barr Virus Antibodies and Risk of Multiple Sclerosis: A Prospective Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.286.24.3083
The paper
Ascherio, A., Munger, K. L., Lennette, E. T., Spiegelman, D., Hernán, M. A., Olek, M. J., Hankinson, S. E., & Hunter, D. J. (2001). Epstein-Barr Virus Antibodies and Risk of Multiple Sclerosis: A Prospective Study. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.24.3083

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.