Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 499

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Re-Evaluation of the Frequency of CD8+ T Cells Specific for EBV in Healthy Virus Carriers

Tan, Linda C, Gudgeon, Nancy, Annels, Nicola E, Hansasuta, Pokrath, O’Callaghan, Chris A, Rowland-Jones, Sarah, McMichael, Andrew J, Rickinson, Alan B, Callan, Margaret F C·1999·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

EBV is a gammaherpesvirus that can establish both nonproductive (latent) and productive (lytic) infections within the cells of its host. Although T cell responses to EBV latent proteins have been well characterized, little is known about the importance of responses to lytic proteins in long term virus carriers. Here we have compared the frequencies of CD8+ T cells specific for EBV latent and lytic Ags in healthy virus carriers, using three techniques: limiting dilution analysis, enzyme-linked immunospot assay, and FACS staining with tetrameric MHC-peptide complexes. T cells specific for EBV lytic protein epitopes were readily detectable in all donors and were usually more abundant than those specific for latent epitopes. We infer that direct T cell control of viral replicative lesions is maintained in long term carriers of EBV and is an important component of the immune response to this virus. Estimates of CD8+ T cell frequencies varied considerably according to methodology; values obtained from MHC-peptide tetramer staining were, on the average, 4.4-fold higher than those obtained from enzyme-linked immunospot assays, which were, in turn, on the average, 5.3-fold higher than those obtained from limiting dilution analysis. Tetramer staining showed that as many as 5.5% circulating CD8+ T cells in a virus carrier were specific for a single EBV lytic protein epitope. Such values are much greater than previously imagined and illustrate how antigenic challenge from a persistent herpesvirus can influence the composition of the host’s CD8+ T cell pool.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.162.3.1827

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 499

Metadata

Authors
Tan, L. C., Gudgeon, N., Annels, N. E., Hansasuta, P., O’Callaghan, C. A., Rowland-Jones, S., McMichael, A. J., Rickinson, A. B., & Callan, M. F. C.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
1999-02-01
Volume
162
Issue
3
Pages
1827-1835
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2145928191
Cited by
499
References
43
FWCI
27.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Re-Evaluation of the Frequency of CD8+ T Cells Specific for EBV in Healthy Virus Carriers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.162.3.1827
The paper
Tan, L. C., Gudgeon, N., Annels, N. E., Hansasuta, P., O’Callaghan, C. A., Rowland-Jones, S., McMichael, A. J., Rickinson, A. B., & Callan, M. F. C. (1999). A Re-Evaluation of the Frequency of CD8+ T Cells Specific for EBV in Healthy Virus Carriers. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.162.3.1827

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.