Cited by 123Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Patient Safety Efforts Should Focus on Medical Errors

McNutt, Robert A.·2002·JAMA

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.287.15.1997

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first two widely cited CPOE studies did not demonstrate improvements in patient outcomes.

    “Although the first two studies have been widely cited as showing CPOE benefits, neither showed improvements in patient outcomes.20 -22”

    From EHR Safety: The Way Forward to Safe and Effective Systems (2008) · cites this paper as [21]

  • Only five studies have examined overall safety and effectiveness.

    “Although some measures of error showed improvement, overall safety and effectiveness have been addressed in only five studies.[21][22][23][24][25]”

    From EHR Safety: The Way Forward to Safe and Effective Systems (2008) · cites this paper as [21]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McNutt, R. A.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
McNutt, Robert A.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2002-04-17
Volume
287
Issue
15
Pages
1997
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1986640207
Cited by
123
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
22.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
patient safety, medical errors, medical error prevention
MeSH terms
Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Institutional Management Teams, Intensive Care Units, Patient Care Management, Quality of Health Care, Safety, Models, Organizational, Medical Errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review