Cited by 414Electronic Health Records SystemsPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Beyond usability: Designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety

Open access
Karsh, B-T·2004·Quality and Safety in Health Care

Abstract

Evidence is emerging that certain technologies such as computerized provider order entry may reduce the likelihood of patient harm. However, many technologies that should reduce medical errors have been abandoned because of problems with their design, their impact on workflow, and general dissatisfaction with them by end users. Patient safety researchers have therefore looked to human factors engineering for guidance on how to design technologies to be usable (easy to use) and useful (improving job performance, efficiency, and/or quality). While this is a necessary step towards improving the likelihood of end user satisfaction, it is still not sufficient. Human factors engineering research has shown that the manner in which technologies are implemented also needs to be designed carefully if benefits are to be realized. This paper reviews the theoretical knowledge on what leads to successful technology implementation and how this can be translated into specifically designed processes for successful technology change. The literature on diffusion of innovations, technology acceptance, organisational justice, participative decision making, and organisational change is reviewed and strategies for promoting successful implementation are provided. Given the rapid and ever increasing pace of technology implementation in health care, it is critical for the science of technology implementation to be understood and incorporated into efforts to improve patient safety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/qshc.2004.010322

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Problematic system design can undermine otherwise appealing and effective products.

    “problematic system design can easily undermine otherwise appealing and effective products (Littlejohns, Wyatt, & Garvican, 2003; Karsh, 2004)”
  • The specific context of HIT design and implementation can strongly affect its effectiveness, safety, and true cost.

    “the details of HIT design and implementation 100 in a specific context can make a huge difference to its effectiveness, safety, and real cost”

    From Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities (2010) · cites this paper as [100]

  • The health care literature shows that EHRs can contribute to safety incidents and patient harm.

    “Complicating matters, the health care literature documents the potential of EHRs to contribute to safety incidents and patient harm.1,23,30 -33”

    From EHR Safety: The Way Forward to Safe and Effective Systems (2008) · cites this paper as [30]

  • Initial broad classifications of safety incidents have come from published accounts of CPOE-related errors.

    “Published reports of CPOE-related errors have provided initial, high-level typologies of safety incidents.30,44,45”

    From EHR Safety: The Way Forward to Safe and Effective Systems (2008) · cites this paper as [30]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980.
  2. Carayon P, Smith MJ. The balance theory of job design and stress as a model for the management of technological change. Paper presented at, Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Industrial Engineering France, Marseille, 15-17 December, 1993.
  3. Alexander CJ, Schuldt WJ. Effects of choice, goal difficulty, and need achievement on performance. J Clin Psychol 1984;40:1354-61.
  4. Wagner III JA, Leana CR, Locke EA, et al. Cognitive and motivational frameworks in US research on participation: a meta-analysis of primary effects. J Organ Behav 1997;18:49-65.
  5. Cobb AT, Wooten KC, Folger R. Justice in the making: toward understanding the theory and practice of justice in organizational change and development. Research in organizational change and development. Volume 8. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1995:243-95.
  6. Karsh B. The implementation of new technology: a case study in a government agency Masters Thesis. Madison: University of Wisconsin- Madison, 1996. 111

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karsh, B.-T.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Karsh, B-T
Venue
Quality and Safety in Health Care
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2004-10-01
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
388-394
ISSN
  • 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3901
OpenAlex
W2150337999
Cited by
414
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
FWCI
15.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1r01hs013610-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
technology implementation, patient safety, human factors engineering, computerized physician order entry, medical errors, diffusion of innovations, technology acceptance, organizational justice, participative decision-making, organizational change, health technology adoption, usability
MeSH terms
Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Ergonomics, Systems Analysis, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Safety Management, Medical Errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review