The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multiple Sclerosis and Epstein-Barr Virus
Abstract
Context: Infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has been associated with an increased risk of multiple sclerosis (MS), but the temporal relationship remains unclear. Objective: To determine whether antibodies to EBV are elevated before the onset of MS. Design, Setting, and Population: Nested case-control study conducted among more than 3 million US military personnel with blood samples collected between 1988 and 2000 and stored in the Department of Defense Serum Repository. Cases were identified as individuals granted temporary or permanent disability because of MS. For each case (n = 83), 2 controls matched by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and dates of blood sample collection were selected. Main Outcome Measures: Antibodies including IgA against EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA) and IgG against VCA, nuclear antigens (EBNA complex, EBNA-1, and EBNA-2), diffuse and restricted early antigens, and cytomegalovirus. Results: The average time between blood collection and MS onset was 4 years. The strongest predictors of MS were serum levels of IgG antibodies to VCA or EBNA complex. The risk of MS increased monotonically with these antibody titers; relative risk (RR) in persons in the highest category of VCA (≥2560) compared with those in the lowest (≤160) was 19.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-174; P for trend = .004). For EBNA complex titers, the RR for those in the highest category (≥1280) was 33.9 (95% CI, 4.1-283; P for trend <.001) vs those in the lowest category (≤40). Similarly strong positive associations between EBV antibodies and risk of MS were already present in samples collected 5 or more years before MS onset. No association was found between cytomegalovirus antibodies and MS. Conclusion: These results suggest a relationship between EBV infection and development of MS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exploring the origins of grey matter damage in multiple sclerosis
Calabrese, M., Magliozzi, R., Ciccarelli, O., Geurts, J. J. G., Reynolds, R., & Martin, R. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3900 · Cited by 414
Retracted Science and the Retraction Index
Fang, F. C., & Casadevall, A. (2011) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.05661-11 · Cited by 405
RetractedEnvironmental risk factors in multiple sclerosis aetiology
Marrie, R. A. (2004) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(04)00933-0 · Cited by 359
An altered immune response to Epstein-Barr virus in multiple sclerosis: A prospective study
Sundström, P., Juto, P., Wadell, G., Hallmans, G., Svenningsson, A., Nyström, L., Dillner, J., & Forsgren, L. (2004) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000130496.51156.d7 · Cited by 301
Infectious causes of multiple sclerosis
Giovannoni, G., Cutter, G. R., Lunemann, J., Martin, R., Münz, C., Sriram, S., Steiner, I., Hammerschlag, M. R., & Gaydos, C. A. (2006) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70577-4 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Levin, L. I., Munger, K. L., Rubertone, M. V., Peck, C. A., Lennette, E. T., Spiegelman, D., & Ascherio, A.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2003-03-26
- Volume
- 289
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1533
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2118466490
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Sclerosis and Epstein-Barr Virus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.289.12.1533
- The paper
- Levin, L. I., Munger, K. L., Rubertone, M. V., Peck, C. A., Lennette, E. T., Spiegelman, D., & Ascherio, A. (2003). Multiple Sclerosis and Epstein-Barr Virus. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.12.1533
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.