The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Neurolytic Celiac Plexus Block on Pain Relief, Quality of Life, and Survival in Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
CONTEXT: Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive tumor associated with high mortality. Optimal pain control may improve quality of life (QOL) for these patients. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) vs opioids alone improves pain relief, QOL, and survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Double-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Enrolled (October 1997 and January 2001) were 100 eligible patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer experiencing pain. Patients were followed up for at least 1 year or until death. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either NCPB or systemic analgesic therapy alone with a sham injection. All patients could receive additional opioids managed by a clinician blinded to the treatment assignment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain intensity (0-10 numerical rating scale), QOL, opioid consumption and related adverse effects, and survival time were assessed weekly by a blinded observer. RESULTS: Mean (SD) baseline pain was 4.4 (1.7) for NCPB vs 4.1 (1.8) for opioids alone. The first week after randomization, pain intensity and QOL scores were improved (pain intensity, P< or =.01 for both groups; QOL, P<.001 for both groups), with a larger decrease in pain for the NCPB group (P =.005). From repeated measures analysis, pain was also lower for NCPB over time (P =.01). However, opioid consumption (P =.93), frequency of opioid adverse effects (all P>.10), and QOL (P =.46) were not significantly different between groups. In the first 6 weeks, fewer NCPB patients reported moderate or severe pain (pain intensity rating of > or =5/10) vs opioid-only patients (14% vs 40%, P =.005). At 1 year, 16% of NCPB patients and 6% of opioid-only patients were alive. However, survival did not differ significantly between groups (P =.26, proportional hazards regression). CONCLUSION: Although NCPB improves pain relief in patients with pancreatic cancer vs optimized systemic analgesic therapy alone, it does not affect QOL or survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Littell, R. C. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,341
Spencer, P. M., Cameron, J. L., & Lin, L. (2000) · Cited by 7,202
Farrar, J. T., Young, J. P., LaMoreaux, L., Werth, J. L., & Poole, M. R. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00349-9 · Cited by 5,808
AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed
Greene, F., Page, D., Id, F., Fritz, J., Balch, C., & Haller, D. (2002) · Cited by 2,324
Is the Placebo Powerless?: An Analysis of Clinical Trials Comparing Placebo with No Treatment
Hróbjartsson, A., & Gøtzsche, P. C. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105243442106 · Cited by 1,503
Serlin, R. C., Mendoza, T. R., Nakamura, Y., Edwards, K. R., & Cleeland, C. S. (1995) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00178-h · Cited by 1,494
Portenoy, R. K., & Lesage, P. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)01310-0 · Cited by 1,017
A validation study of the WHO method for cancer pain relief
Ventafridda, V., Tamburini, M., Caraceni, A., De Conno, F., & Naldi, F. (1987) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19870215)59:4<850::aid-cncr2820590432>3.0.co;2-1 · Cited by 771
Lillemoe, K. D., Cameron, J. L., Kaufman, H. S., Yeo, C. J., Pitt, H. A., & Sauter, P. K. (1993) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199305010-00004 · Cited by 549
Pharmacologic Treatment of Cancer Pain
Levy, M. H. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199610103351507 · Cited by 479
Cited by
Mizrahi, J. D., Surana, R., Valle, J. W., & Shroff, R. T. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30974-0 · Cited by 2,559
Recent progress in pancreatic cancer
Wolfgang, C. L., Herman, J. M., Laheru, D. A., Klein, A. P., Erdek, M. A., Fishman, E. K., & Hruban, R. H. (2013) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21190 · Cited by 910
Adult Cancer Pain, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Swarm, R. A., Paice, J. A., Anghelescu, D. L., Are, M., Bruce, J. Y., Buga, S., Chwistek, M., Cleeland, C., Craig, D., Gafford, E., et al. (2019) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0038 · Cited by 621
Cancer pain and its impact on diagnosis, survival and quality of life
Mantyh, P. W. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1914 · Cited by 441
Rummans, T. A., Clark, M. M., Sloan, J. A., Frost, M. H., Bostwick, J. M., Atherton, P. J., Johnson, M. E., Gamble, G., Richardson, J., Brown, P., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.06.209 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, G. Y., Schroeder, D. R., Carns, P. E., Wilson, J. L., Martin, D. P., Kinney, M. O., Mantilla, C. B., & Warner, D. O.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2004-03-03
- Volume
- 291
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1092
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2008315683
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 29.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Neurolytic Celiac Plexus Block on Pain Relief, Quality of Life, and Survival in Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.291.9.1092
- The paper
- Wong, G. Y., Schroeder, D. R., Carns, P. E., Wilson, J. L., Martin, D. P., Kinney, M. O., Mantilla, C. B., & Warner, D. O. (2004). Effect of Neurolytic Celiac Plexus Block on Pain Relief, Quality of Life, and Survival in Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.9.1092
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.