Cited by 353Cancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Impacting quality of life for patients with advanced cancer with a structured multidisciplinary intervention: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Rummans, Teresa A., Clark, Matthew M., Sloan, Jeff A., Frost, Marlene H., Bostwick, John Michael, Atherton, Pamela J., Johnson, Mary E., Gamble, Gail +8 more·2006·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a structured, multidisciplinary intervention targeted to maintain the overall quality of life (QOL), which is more comprehensive than psychosocial distress, of patients undergoing radiation therapy for advanced-stage cancer. Patients and Methods: Radiation therapy patients with advanced cancer and an estimated 5-year survival rate of 0% to 50% were randomly assigned to either an eight-session structured multidisciplinary intervention arm or a standard care arm. The eight 90-minute sessions addressed the five domains of QOL including cognitive, physical, emotional, spiritual, and social functioning. The primary end point of maintaining overall QOL was assessed by a single-item linear analog scale (Linear Analog Scale of Assessment or modified Spitzer Uniscale). QOL was assessed at baseline, week 4 (end of multidisciplinary intervention), week 8, and week 27. Results: Of the 103 participants, overall QOL at week 4 was maintained by the patients in the intervention (n = 49), whereas QOL at week 4 significantly decreased for patients in the control group (n = 54). This change reflected a 3-point increase from baseline in the intervention group and a 9-point decrease from baseline in the control group (P = .009). Intervention participants maintained their QOL, and controls gradually returned to baseline by the end of the 6-month follow-up period. Conclusion: Although intervention participants maintained and actually improved their QOL during radiation therapy, control participants experienced a significant decrease in their QOL. Thus, a structured multidisciplinary intervention can help maintain or even improve QOL in patients with advanced cancer who are undergoing cancer treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2006.06.209

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rummans et al. implemented a structured multidisciplinary intervention targeting five QOL domains (cognitive, emotional, physical, social, spiritual) with advanced cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy.

    “Rummans et al.24 implemented a structured multidisciplinary intervention targeting five QOL domains (cognitive, emotional, physical, social and spiritual) with advanced cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy.”
  • Participants in the intervention group reported similar QOL scores at follow-up six months later (p=.992).

    “Further, participants in the intervention group reported similar QOL scores at follow-up six months later (p=.992).24”
  • Even in advanced cancer, intervention patients reported stable QOL outcomes by four weeks compared to control group patients who experienced a significant decline in QOL at week four (p=.046).

    “Even in the context of advanced cancer, the intervention patients reported stable QOL outcomes by four weeks in comparison to control group patients who experienced a significant decline in QOL at week four (p=.046).”
  • Intervention sessions addressed self-management components including goal-setting, taking charge, problem-solving, redirecting negative thoughts, building interpersonal relationships, and managing emotional and spiritual responses.

    “Intervention sessions addressed components of SM, including goal-setting, taking charge, problem-solving, redirecting negative thoughts, building interpersonal relationships, and managing emotional and spiritual responses.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nunnally J, Bernstein I: Psychometric Theory. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, 1994

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rummans, T. A., Clark, M. M., Sloan, J. A., Frost, M. H., Bostwick, J. M., Atherton, P. J., Johnson, M. E., Gamble, G., Richardson, J., Brown, P., Martensen, J., Miller, J., Piderman, K., Huschka, M., Girardi, J., & Hanson, J.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
635-642
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2126233165
Cited by
353
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 25
FWCI
8.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
quality of life, advanced cancer, radiotherapy, multidisciplinary intervention, psychosocial support, cancer patients, feasibility, emotional functioning, social functioning, cognitive function, physical function
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Emotions, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Patient Care Team, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Role, Treatment Outcome, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review