The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Patient Literacy on the Effectiveness of a Primary Care–Based Diabetes Disease Management Program
Abstract
CONTEXT: Low literacy is an important barrier for patients with diabetes, but interventions to address low literacy have not been well examined. OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of literacy on the effectiveness of a comprehensive disease management program for patients with diabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of the influence of literacy on glycemic control and systolic blood pressure using data from a randomized controlled trial (conducted from February 2001 through April 2003) of a comprehensive diabetes management program. Participants were 217 patients aged 18 years or older with type 2 diabetes and poor glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] levels > or =8.0%) and presenting to a US academic general internal medicine practice. INTERVENTIONS: All communication to patients was individualized and delivered to enhance comprehension among patients with low literacy. Intervention patients received intensive disease management from a multidisciplinary team. Control patients received an initial management session and continued with usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Achievement of goal HbA1c levels and systolic blood pressure at 12-month follow-up for control and intervention patients stratified by literacy status. RESULTS: Complete 12-month data were available for 193 patients (89%). Among patients with low literacy, intervention patients were more likely than control patients to achieve goal HbA1c levels (< or =7.0%) (42% vs 15%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 17.2; P = .02). Patients with higher literacy had similar odds of achieving goal HbA1c levels regardless of intervention status (24% vs 23%; adjusted OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.5; P = .98). Improvements in systolic blood pressure were similar by literacy status. CONCLUSIONS: Literacy may be an important factor for predicting who will benefit from an intervention for diabetes management. A diabetes disease management program that addresses literacy may be particularly beneficial for patients with low literacy, and increasing access to such a program could help reduce health disparities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion
Committee on Health Literacy, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, & Institute of Medicine (2004) · doi:10.17226/10883 · Cited by 3,444
Literacy and health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature
DeWalt, D. A., Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S., Lohr, K. N., & Pignone, M. P. (2004) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x · Cited by 2,309
Association of Health Literacy With Diabetes Outcomes
Schillinger, D. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.4.475 · Cited by 1,938
Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument.
Davis, T. C., Long, S. W., Jackson, R. H., Mayeaux, E. J., George, R. B., Murphy, P. W., & Crouch, M. A. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 1,597
Closing the Loop: Physician Communication With Diabetic Patients Who Have Low Health Literacy
Schillinger, D., Piette, J., Grumbach, K., Wang, F., Wilson, C., Daher, C., Leong-Grotz, K., Castro, C., & Bindman, A. B. (2003) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.163.1.83 · Cited by 1,162
Williams, M. V., Baker, D. W., Parker, R. M., & Nurss, J. R. (1998) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.158.2.166 · Cited by 1,157
Renders, C. M., Valk, G. D., Griffin, S. J., Wagner, E. H., Eijk van, J. T., & Assendelft, W. J. J. (2001) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.24.10.1821 · Cited by 1,066
Kirsch, I. S., & Improvement (1993) · Cited by 1,061
Health Literacy Among Medicare Enrollees in a Managed Care Organization
Gazmararian, J. A. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.6.545 · Cited by 876
Health literacy and the risk of hospital admission
Baker, D. W., Parker, R. M., Williams, M. V., & Clark, W. S. (1998) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00242.x · Cited by 834
Cited by
Advancing Health Disparities Research Within the Health Care System: A Conceptual Framework
Kilbourne, A. M., Switzer, G., Hyman, K., Crowley-Matoka, M., & Fine, M. J. (2006) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2005.077628 · Cited by 761
Is self-efficacy associated with diabetes self-management across race/ethnicity and health literacy?
Sarkar, U., Fisher, L., & Schillinger, D. (2006) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.29.04.06.dc05-1615 · Cited by 594
Bostock, S., & Steptoe, A. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e1602 · Cited by 601
Measuring Functional, Communicative, and Critical Health Literacy Among Diabetic Patients
Ishikawa, H., Takeuchi, T., & Yano, E. (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc07-1932 · Cited by 565
Impact of low health literacy on patients’ health outcomes: a multicenter cohort study
Shahid, R., Shoker, M., Chu, L. M., Frehlick, R., Ward, H., & Pahwa, P. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08527-9 · Cited by 493
Metadata
- Authors
- Rothman, R. L.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2004-10-13
- Volume
- 292
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1711
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2043740403
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 9.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of Patient Literacy on the Effectiveness of a Primary Care–Based Diabetes Disease Management Program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.292.14.1711
- The paper
- Rothman, R. L. (2004). Influence of Patient Literacy on the Effectiveness of a Primary Care–Based Diabetes Disease Management Program. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.14.1711
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.