The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bone Mineral Density and the Risk of Incident Nonspinal Fractures in Black and White Women
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Black women have a lower rate of fracture than white women, but whether bone mineral density (BMD) predicts fracture risk as well in black women as it does in white women is not established. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between BMD and incident nonspinal fractures in older black and white women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort study of baseline data collected from 1986 through 1990 (7334 white women aged 67-99 years) and from 1996 through 1998 (636 black women aged 65-94 years) at 4 US clinical centers in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures; mean (SD) follow-up of 6.1 (1.5) years until October 1, 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incident nonspinal fractures were confirmed by radiograpic report. Total hip and femoral neck BMD and bone mineral content were measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: A total of 58 black women had a combined total of 61 fractures and 1606 white women had a combined total of 1712 fractures. In age-adjusted proportional hazard models, a 1-SD decrease in femoral neck BMD was associated with a 37% increased risk of fracture in black women (relative risk [RR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.74) and a 49% increase in fracture in white women (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.40-1.58). Adjustment for body weight and other risk factors for fracture weakened the association between BMD and fracture, especially among black women (multivariable adjusted RR per 1-SD decrease in femoral neck BMD for black vs white women: RR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.93-1.55] vs RR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.32-1.52]). The absolute incidence of fracture across the pooled BMD distribution was 30% to 40% lower among black women at every BMD tertile. The lower risk of fracture among black compared with white women was independent of BMD and other risk factors (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.36-0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Decreased total hip and femoral neck BMD is associated with an increased risk of fracture in both older black and white women, but this relationship was largely explained by other risk factors in black women. Black women have a lower fracture risk than white women at every level of BMD. Race-specific normative databases may be appropriate for the densitometric definition of osteoporosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk Factors for Hip Fracture in White Women
Cummings, S. R., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W. S., Stone, K., Fox, K. M., Ensrud, K. E., Cauley, J., Black, D., & Vogt, T. M. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199503233321202 · Cited by 3,595
Self-citationPhysical Activity, All-Cause Mortality, and Longevity of College Alumni
Paffenbarger, R. S., Hyde, R., Wing, A. L., & Hsieh, C.-C. (1986) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198603063141003 · Cited by 2,742
Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures
Cummings, S. R., Browner, W., Cummings, S. R., Black, D. M., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W., Genant, H. K., Cauley, J., Ensrud, K., Scott, J., et al. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92555-8 · Cited by 2,446
Self-citationEstimating African American Admixture Proportions by Use of Population-Specific Alleles
Parra, E. J., Marcini, A., Akey, J., Martinson, J., Batzer, M. A., Cooper, R., Forrester, T., Allison, D. B., Deka, R., Ferrell, R. E., et al. (1998) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302148 · Cited by 771 · cited 1×
“8%).(33) In our study, we had no information on admixture.”
Background
Cited by
Studenski, S. A., Peters, K. W., Alley, D. E., Cawthon, P. M., McLean, R. R., Harris, T. B., Ferrucci, L., Guralnik, J. M., Fragala, M. S., Kenny, A. M., et al. (2014) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glu010 · Cited by 2,545
The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis
LeBoff, M. S., Greenspan, S. L., Insogna, K. L., Lewiecki, E. M., Saag, K. G., Singer, A. J., & Siris, E. S. (2022) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-021-05900-y · Cited by 1,487
Weaver, C. M., Gordon, C. M., Janz, K. F., Kalkwarf, H. J., Lappe, J. M., Lewis, R., O’Karma, M., Wallace, T. C., & Zemel, B. S. (2016) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-015-3440-3 · Cited by 1,378
Vitamin D–Binding Protein and Vitamin D Status of Black Americans and White Americans
Powe, C. E., Evans, M. K., Wenger, J., Zonderman, A. B., Berg, A. H., Nalls, M., Tamez, H., Zhang, D., Bhan, I., Karumanchi, S. A., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1306357 · Cited by 1,087
Sarcopenia Definition: The Position Statements of the Sarcopenia Definition and Outcomes Consortium
Bhasin, S., Travison, T. G., Manini, T. M., Patel, S., Pencina, K. M., Fielding, R. A., Magaziner, J. M., Newman, A. B., Kiel, D. P., Cooper, C., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.16372 · Cited by 723
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cauley, J. A.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2005-05-04
- Volume
- 293
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2102
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1977975617
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.