Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Temporal Trends in Infective Endocarditis: A Population-Based Study in Olmsted County, Minnesota

Tleyjeh, Imad M., Steckelberg, James M., Murad, Hani S., Anavekar, Nandan S., Ghomrawi, Hassan M. K., Mirzoyev, Zaur, Moustafa, Sherif E., Hoskin, Tanya L., Mandrekar, Jayawant N., Wilson, Walter R., Baddour, Larry M.·2005·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Limited data exist regarding population-based epidemiologic changes in incidence of infective endocarditis (IE). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate temporal trends in the incidence and clinical characteristics of IE. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Population-based survey using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project of Olmsted County, Minnesota. One hundred seven IE episodes occurred in 102 Olmsted County residents between 1970 and 2000. The modified Duke criteria were used to validate the diagnosis of definite or possible IE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of IE, proportion of patients with underlying heart disease, and causative microorganisms and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Age- and sex-adjusted incidence of IE ranged from 5.0 to 7.0 cases per 100,000 person-years during the study period and did not change significantly over time (P = .42 for trend). Infective endocarditis caused by viridans group streptococci was the most common organism-specific subgroup, with an annual adjusted incidence of 1.7 to 3.5 cases per 100,000; in comparison, IE due to Staphylococcus aureus had an annual adjusted incidence of 1.0 to 2.2 cases per 100,000. No time trend was detected for either pathogen group (P = .63 and P = .66, respectively). An increasing temporal trend was observed in the proportions of prosthetic valve IE cases (P = .09). Among people with underlying heart disease, there was an increasing temporal trend in mitral valve prolapse (P = .04) and a decreasing trend in rheumatic heart disease (P = .08). However, the absolute numbers were small. There was no time trend in rates of valve surgery or 6-month mortality during the study period (P = .97 and P = .59, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this community-based temporal trend study, we found no substantial change in the incidence of IE over the past 3 decades. Viridans group streptococci continue to outnumber S aureus as the most common causative organisms of IE in this population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.293.24.3022

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 366

Metadata

Authors
Tleyjeh, I. M., Steckelberg, J. M., Murad, H. S., Anavekar, N. S., Ghomrawi, H. M. K., Mirzoyev, Z., Moustafa, S. E., Hoskin, T. L., Mandrekar, J. N., Wilson, W. R., & Baddour, L. M.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2005-06-22
Volume
293
Issue
24
Pages
3022
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2096009044
Cited by
366
References
22
FWCI
16.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal Trends in Infective Endocarditis: A Population-Based Study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.293.24.3022
The paper
Tleyjeh, I. M., Steckelberg, J. M., Murad, H. S., Anavekar, N. S., Ghomrawi, H. M. K., Mirzoyev, Z., Moustafa, S. E., Hoskin, T. L., Mandrekar, J. N., Wilson, W. R., & Baddour, L. M. (2005). Temporal Trends in Infective Endocarditis: A Population-Based Study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.24.3022

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.