The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Treatment of Postoperative Hypoxemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
CONTEXT: Hypoxemia complicates the recovery of 30% to 50% of patients after abdominal surgery; endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation may be required in 8% to 10% of cases, increasing morbidity and mortality and prolonging intensive care unit and hospital stay. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure compared with standard treatment in preventing the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation in patients who develop acute hypoxemia after elective major abdominal surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized, controlled, unblinded study with concealed allocation conducted between June 2002 and November 2003 at 15 intensive care units of the Piedmont Intensive Care Units Network in Italy. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients who developed severe hypoxemia after major elective abdominal surgery. The trial was stopped for efficacy after 209 patients had been enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive oxygen (n = 104) or oxygen plus continuous positive airway pressure (n = 105). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was incidence of endotracheal intubation; secondary end points were intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, incidence of pneumonia, infection and sepsis, and hospital mortality. RESULTS: Patients who received oxygen plus continuous positive airway pressure had a lower intubation rate (1% vs 10%; P = .005; relative risk [RR], 0.099; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.76) and had a lower occurrence rate of pneumonia (2% vs 10%, RR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.88; P = .02), infection (3% vs 10%, RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.07-0.94; P = .03), and sepsis (2% vs 9%; RR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.04-0.99; P = .03) than did patients treated with oxygen alone. Patients who received oxygen plus continuous positive airway pressure also spent fewer mean (SD) days in the intensive care unit (1.4 [1.6] vs 2.6 [4.2], P = .09) than patients treated with oxygen alone. The treatments did not affect the mean (SD) days that patients spent in the hospital (15 [13] vs 17 [15], respectively; P = .10). None of those treated with oxygen plus continuous positive airway pressure died in the hospital while 3 deaths occurred among those treated with oxygen alone (P = .12). CONCLUSION: Continuous positive airway pressure may decrease the incidence of endotracheal intubation and other severe complications in patients who develop hypoxemia after elective major abdominal surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bernard, G. R., Artigas, A., Brigham, K. L., Carlet, J., Falke, K., Hudson, L., Lamy, M., Legall, J. R., Morris, A., & Spragg, R. (1994) · American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.149.3.7509706 · Cited by 6,746
Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials
GORDON LAN, K. K., & DEMETS, D. L. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.3.659 · Cited by 2,310
Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials
POCOCK, S. J. (1977) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/64.2.191 · Cited by 1,831
Kaneko, Y., Floras, J. S., Usui, K., Plante, J., Tkacova, R., Kubo, T., Ando, S.-I., & Bradley, T. D. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022479 · Cited by 1,051
Cited by
Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure
Rochwerg, B., Brochard, L., Elliott, M. W., Hess, D., Hill, N. S., Nava, S., Navalesi, P., Antonelli, M., Brozek, J., Conti, G., et al. (2017) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.02426-2016 · Cited by 1,668
Young, C. C., Harris, E. M., Vacchiano, C., Bodnar, S., Bukowy, B., Elliott, R. R. D., Migliarese, J., Ragains, C., Trethewey, B., Woodward, A., et al. (2019) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.017 · Cited by 435
Keenan, S. P., Sinuff, T., Burns, K. E. A., Muscedere, J., Kutsogiannis, J., Mehta, S., Cook, D. J., Ayas, N., Adhikari, N. K. J., Hand, L., et al. (2011) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.100071 · Cited by 369
Mascia, L., Pasero, D., Slutsky, A. S., Arguis, M. J., Berardino, M., Grasso, S., Munari, M., Boifava, S., Cornara, G., Della Corte, F., et al. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1796 · Cited by 361
Self-citationObesity hypoventilation syndrome
Masa, J. F., Pépin, J.-L., Borel, J.-C., Mokhlesi, B., Murphy, P. B., & Sánchez-Quiroga, M. Á. (2019) · European Respiratory Review · doi:10.1183/16000617.0097-2018 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Squadrone, V., Coha, M., Cerutti, E., Schellino, M. M., Biolino, P., Occella, P., Belloni, G., Vilianis, G., Fiore, G., Cavallo, F., Ranieri, V. M., & Piedmont Intensive Care Units Network (PICUN), F. T.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2005-02-02
- Volume
- 293
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 589
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2130318815
- Cited by
- 667
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 33.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Treatment of Postoperative Hypoxemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.293.5.589
- The paper
- Squadrone, V., Coha, M., Cerutti, E., Schellino, M. M., Biolino, P., Occella, P., Belloni, G., Vilianis, G., Fiore, G., Cavallo, F., Ranieri, V. M., & Piedmont Intensive Care Units Network (PICUN), F. T. (2005). Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Treatment of Postoperative Hypoxemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.5.589
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.