Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Outbreak of Fusarium Keratitis Associated With Contact Lens Wear in Singapore

Khor, Wei-Boon, Aung, Tin, Saw, Seang-Mei, Wong, Tien-Yin, Tambyah, Paul A., Tan, Ai-Ling, Beuerman, Roger, Lim, Li, Chan, Wing-Kwong, Heng, Wee-Jin, Lim, Jimmy, Loh, Raymond S. K., Lee, Sao-Bing, Tan, Donald T. H.·2006·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Fungal keratitis is a potentially blinding condition that is rarely seen with contact lens wear. OBJECTIVE: To describe a nationwide outbreak of fungal keratitis caused by Fusarium species among contact lens wearers in Singapore. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Nationwide, hospital-based case series. All cases of fungal keratitis among contact lens wearers in all ophthalmology departments in Singapore were reviewed along with the charts of all contact lens wearers with culture-proven fungal keratitis from March 2005 through May 2006. A standardized telephone interview was conducted to obtain additional clinical information. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Diagnosis of Fusarium keratitis associated with contact lens wear. RESULTS: During the study period, 66 patients (68 affected eyes) were diagnosed with Fusarium keratitis associated with contact lens wear; the estimated annual national incidence is 2.35 cases per 10,000 contact lens wearers (95% confidence interval, 0.62-7.22). Patients ranged in age from 13 to 44 years (mean [SD], 27.1 [8.4] years), of which 32 (48.5%) were men. The vast majority (65 patients; 98.5%) wore soft, disposable contact lenses; 62 patients (93.9%) reported using 1 brand of contact lens cleaning solution (ReNu, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY), including 42 patients (63.6%) who recalled using ReNu with MoistureLoc. Most patients (81.8%) reported poor contact lens hygiene practices, including overnight use of daily wear contact lenses (19.7%), and use of contact lenses past the replacement date (43.9%). The final best-corrected visual acuity ranged from 20/20 to 20/80. Five patients (5 eyes; 7.4%) required emergency therapeutic or tectonic corneal transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: A new and evolving epidemic of Fusarium keratitis associated with contact lens wear was found in Singapore. Physicians and eye care practitioners worldwide need to be aware of the likelihood of similar outbreaks emerging among contact lens wearers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.295.24.2867

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Khor, W.-B., Aung, T., Saw, S.-M., Wong, T.-Y., Tambyah, P. A., Tan, A.-L., Beuerman, R., Lim, L., Chan, W.-K., Heng, W.-J., Lim, J., Loh, R. S. K., Lee, S.-B., & Tan, D. T. H.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2006-06-28
Volume
295
Issue
24
Pages
2867
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2103617967
Cited by
255
References
27
FWCI
20.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Outbreak of Fusarium Keratitis Associated With Contact Lens Wear in Singapore. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.295.24.2867
The paper
Khor, W.-B., Aung, T., Saw, S.-M., Wong, T.-Y., Tambyah, P. A., Tan, A.-L., Beuerman, R., Lim, L., Chan, W.-K., Heng, W.-J., Lim, J., Loh, R. S. K., Lee, S.-B., & Tan, D. T. H. (2006). An Outbreak of Fusarium Keratitis Associated With Contact Lens Wear in Singapore. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.24.2867

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.