The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Economic Return of Clinical Trials Performed Under the Pediatric Exclusivity Program
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: In 1997, Congress authorized the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to grant 6-month extensions of marketing rights through the Pediatric Exclusivity Program if industry sponsors complete FDA-requested pediatric trials. The program has been praised for creating incentives for studies in children and has been criticized as a "windfall" to the innovator drug industry. This critique has been a substantial part of congressional debate on the program, which is due to expire in 2007. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the economic return to industry for completing pediatric exclusivity trials. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cohort study of programs conducted for pediatric exclusivity. Nine drugs that were granted pediatric exclusivity were selected. From the final study reports submitted to the FDA (2002-2004), key elements of the clinical trial design and study operations were obtained, and the cost of performing each study was estimated and converted into estimates of after-tax cash outflows. Three-year market sales were obtained and converted into estimates of after-tax cash inflows based on 6 months of additional market protection. Net economic return (cash inflows minus outflows) and net return-to-costs ratio (net economic return divided by cash outflows) for each product were then calculated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Net economic return and net return-to-cost ratio. RESULTS: The indications studied reflect a broad representation of the program: asthma, tumors, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, hypertension, depression/generalized anxiety disorder, diabetes mellitus, gastroesophageal reflux, bacterial infection, and bone mineralization. The distribution of net economic return for 6 months of exclusivity varied substantially among products (net economic return ranged from -$8.9 million to $507.9 million and net return-to-cost ratio ranged from -0.68 to 73.63). CONCLUSIONS: The economic return for pediatric exclusivity is variable. As an incentive to complete much-needed clinical trials in children, pediatric exclusivity can generate lucrative returns or produce more modest returns on investment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The High Cost of Prescription Drugs in the United States: Origins and Prospects for Reform
Kesselheim, A. S., Avorn, J., & Sarpatwari, A. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.11237 · Cited by 592
Joseph, P. D., Craig, J. C., & Caldwell, P. H. Y. (2015) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.12305 · Cited by 393
Orenstein, S. R., Hassall, E., Furmaga-Jablonska, W., Atkinson, S., & Raanan, M. (2009) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.09.054 · Cited by 381
Speich, B., von Niederhäusern, B., Schur, N., Hemkens, L. G., Fürst, T., Bhatnagar, N., Alturki, R., Agarwal, A., Kasenda, B., Pauli-Magnus, C., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.018 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J. S., Eisenstein, E. L., Grabowski, H. G., Reid, E. D., Mangum, B., Schulman, K. A., Goldsmith, J. V., Murphy, M. D., Califf, R. M., & Benjamin, D. K.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2007-02-07
- Volume
- 297
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 480
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2136510168
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Economic Return of Clinical Trials Performed Under the Pediatric Exclusivity Program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.297.5.480
- The paper
- Li, J. S., Eisenstein, E. L., Grabowski, H. G., Reid, E. D., Mangum, B., Schulman, K. A., Goldsmith, J. V., Murphy, M. D., Califf, R. M., & Benjamin, D. K. (2007). Economic Return of Clinical Trials Performed Under the Pediatric Exclusivity Program. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.5.480
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.