Cited by 2,119Advanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

Single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detects serum proteins at subfemtomolar concentrations

Open access
Rissin, David M, Kan, Cheuk W, Campbell, Todd G, Howes, Stuart C, Fournier, David R, Song, Linan, Piech, Tomasz, Patel, Purvish P +7 more·2010·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

The ability to detect single protein molecules in blood could accelerate the discovery and use of more sensitive diagnostic biomarkers. To detect low-abundance proteins in blood, we captured them on microscopic beads decorated with specific antibodies and then labeled the immunocomplexes (one or zero labeled target protein molecules per bead) with an enzymatic reporter capable of generating a fluorescent product. After isolating the beads in 50-fl reaction chambers designed to hold only a single bead, we used fluorescence imaging to detect single protein molecules. Our single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (digital ELISA) approach detected as few as approximately 10-20 enzyme-labeled complexes in 100 microl of sample (approximately 10(-19) M) and routinely allowed detection of clinically relevant proteins in serum at concentrations (<10(-15) M) much lower than conventional ELISA. Digital ELISA detected prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in sera from patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy at concentrations as low as 14 fg/ml (0.4 fM).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.1641

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of a given protein in a sample is inferred from identification of the peptides it contains, in a process known as protein inference.

    “The presence of a given protein in the sample is inferred from identification of the peptides it contains, in a process known as 'protein inference' 32 .”

    From How many human proteoforms are there? (2018) · cites this paper as [32]

    The paper’s assay description (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) describes detecting proteins with antibody capture and enzyme-labeled complexes, not identifying peptides to infer which proteins are present. Searches for “protein inference,” peptide identification, and mass spectrometry found no passage addressing the claimed process. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]Wild D The Immunoassay Handbook, 3rd Edition Third Edition 930 Elsevier 2005
  2. [19]Anderson NL Anderson NG The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects Molecular Cell Proteomics 1 845 867 2002 12488461
  3. [27]Jackson TM Ekins RP Theoretical limitations on immunoassay sensitivity. Current practice and potential advantages of fluorescent Eu3+ chelates as non-radioisotopic tracers Journal of Immunological Methods 87 13 20 1986 3512720

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rissin, D. M., Kan, C. W., Campbell, T. G., Howes, S. C., Fournier, D. R., Song, L., Piech, T., Patel, P. P., Chang, L., Rivnak, A. J., Ferrell, E. P., Randall, J. D., Provuncher, G. K., Walt, D. R., & Duffy, D. C.
Affiliations
  • Quanterix (United States) (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2010-05-23
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
595-599
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2092198587
Cited by
2,119
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 176 · 2025: 217 · 2024: 177 · 2023: 189 · 2022: 186 · 2021: 191 · 2020: 200 · 2019: 140 · 2018: 130 · 2017: 112 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 51
FWCI
22.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R43CA133987, R44CA133987)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Keywords
single-molecule detection, digital ELISA, single-molecule fluorescence microscopy, antibody-coated beads, prostate-specific antigen, prostate cancer biomarkers, bead-based immunoassay
MeSH terms
Blood Proteins, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Humans, Male, Microchemistry, Prostatectomy, Prostate-Specific Antigen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review