CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 569Healthcare Systems and Public HealthCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent trends in cardiovascular mortality in the United States and public health goals.

Sidney, Stephen, Quesenberry, Charles P., Jaffe, Marc G., Sorel, Michael, Nguyen-Huynh, Mai N., Kushi, Lawrence H., Go, Alan S., Rana, Jamal S.·2016·JAMA Cardiology
DOI 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1326
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Heart disease (HD) and cancer are the 2 leading causes of death in the United States. During the first decade of the 21st century, HD mortality declined at a much greater rate than cancer mortality and it appeared that cancer would overtake HD as the leading cause of death. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether changes in national trends had occurred in recent years in mortality rates due to all cardiovascular disease (CVD), HD, stroke, and cancer and to evaluate the gap between mortality rates from HD and cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research data system was used to determine national trends in age-adjusted mortality rates due to all CVD, HD, stroke, and cancer from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2011, and January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2014, overall, by sex, and by race/ethnicity. The present study was conducted from December 30, 2105, to January 18, 2016. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Comparison of annual rates of change and trend in gap between HD and cancer mortality rates. RESULTS: The rate of the decline in all CVD, HD, and stroke mortality decelerated substantially after 2011, and the rate of decline for cancer mortality remained relatively stable. Reported as percentage (95% CI), the annual rates of decline for 2000-2011 were 3.79% (3.61% to 3.97%), 3.69% (3.51% to 3.87%), 4.53% (4.34% to 4.72%), and 1.49% (1.37% to 1.60%) for all CVD, HD, stroke, and cancer mortality, respectively; the rates for 2011-2014 were 0.65% (-0.18% to 1.47%), 0.76% (-0.06% to 1.58%), 0.37% (-0.53% to 1.27%), and 1.55% (1.07% to 2.04%), respectively. Deceleration of the decline in all CVD mortality rates occurred in males, females, and all race/ethnicity groups. For example, the annual rates of decline for total CVD mortality for 2000-2011 were 3.69% (3.48% to 3.89%) for males and 3.98% (3.81% to 4.14%) for females; for 2011-2014, the rates were 0.23% (-0.71% to 1.16%) and 1.17% (0.41% to 1.93%), respectively. The gap between HD and cancer mortality persisted. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Deceleration in the decline of all CVD, HD, and stroke mortality rates has occurred since 2011. If this trend continues, strategic goals for lowering the burden of CVD set by the American Heart Association and the Million Hearts Initiative may not be reached.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1326

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 567

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sidney, S., Quesenberry, C. P., Jaffe, M. G., Sorel, M., Nguyen-Huynh, M. N., Kushi, L. H., Go, A. S., & Rana, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente South San Francisco Medical Center (US)
  • Department of Neurology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Walnut Creek
Corresponding author
Sidney, Stephen
ORCID
Venue
JAMA Cardiology
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2016-08-01
Volume
1
Issue
5
Pages
594
ISSN
2380-6583 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1326
OpenAlex
W2462712634
Cited by
569
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 13
FWCI
58.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (RC2HL101666)
  • National Cancer Institute (U24CA171524)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
cardiovascular mortality, heart disease mortality, cancer mortality, stroke mortality, mortality trends, public health objectives, sex differences, racial and ethnic disparities, age-adjusted mortality rates, United States, cardiovascular disease
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Goals, Heart Diseases, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, United States, Stroke, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review