Cited by 158Health disparities and outcomesHealthcare Policy and ManagementDermatology and Skin Diseases

Association of Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics With Differences in Use of Outpatient Dermatology Services in the United States

Open access
Tripathi, Raghav, Knusel, Konrad D., Ezaldein, Harib H., Scott, Jeffrey F., Bordeaux, Jeremy S.·2018·JAMA Dermatology

Abstract

Importance: Knowledge regarding differences in dermatologic care for patients with a broad range of dermatologic conditions is limited. Objective: To elucidate nationwide differences in use of outpatient dermatologic care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective analysis of nationally representative data from the 2007 to 2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Health care use outcomes for dermatologic conditions (skin cancers, infections, dermatologic inflammatory conditions/ulcers, and other skin disorders) were examined via multivariable logistic regression analyses of outpatient and office-based dermatologist visit rates accounting for sex, age, race/ethnicity, educational level, income, insurance status, region, self-reported condition, and self-reported health status. Participants were 183 054 MEPS respondents who visited a dermatologist from 2007 to 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was whether the patient received outpatient care for any dermatologic condition (by payment). The secondary outcomes were annual health care use by individuals with dermatologic conditions (including per capita expenditure for the visit). Results: Of 183 054 MEPS respondents (mean [SD] age, 34 [23] years; 52.1% female), 19 561 (10.7%) self-reported a dermatologic condition; 9645 patients had a total of 11 761 outpatient visits to dermatologists. Hispanic (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.49-0.61) and black (aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.38-0.46) patients were both less likely to receive outpatient care for their dermatologic condition relative to non-Hispanic white patients. Male patients were less likely to receive outpatient dermatologic care than female patients (aOR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.62-0.70), and Midwestern patients were less likely to receive outpatient dermatologic care than Northeastern patients (aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.91). Patients with Medicaid or Medicare coverage (aOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.83) and uninsured patients (aOR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.33-0.47) were both less likely to receive outpatient dermatologic care than privately insured patients. Increasing educational level and income were associated with increased odds of receiving outpatient care for the dermatologic condition. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings highlight wide-ranging differences in use of dermatologic care in the United States across various demographic and socioeconomic lines. Results of this study suggest an urgent need to further characterize potential dermatologic health care differences and improve use of outpatient dermatologic care among disadvantaged populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3114

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Racial and ethnic disparities in skin cancer mortality often result from delayed diagnosis, which may arise from underutilization of dermatologic care and differences in clinical presentation among SOC patients.

    “Racial and ethnic disparities in skin cancer mortality often result from delayed diagnosis, which may arise from underutilization of dermatologic care [75, 76] and differences in the clinical presentation of skin cancer among SOC patients.”

    From Photoprotection for skin of color (2022) · cites this paper as [76]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, eds; Institute of Medicine Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tripathi, R., Knusel, K. D., Ezaldein, H. H., Scott, J. F., & Bordeaux, J. S.
Affiliations
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Tripathi, Raghav
Venue
JAMA Dermatology
Published
2018-11-01
Volume
154
Issue
11
Pages
1286
ISSN
2168-6068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2893715656
Cited by
158
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
9.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
dermatological care, health care utilization disparities, socioeconomic status, racial and ethnic disparities, Hispanic patients, Black patients, Medicaid, Medicare, uninsured patients, skin cancer, skin infections, regional variation in care, health care expenditure, self-rated health, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Insurance, Health, Male, Middle Aged, Office Visits, Outpatients, Retrospective Studies, Skin Diseases, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Insurance Coverage, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review