Cited by 452Antimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusAntibiotic Use and ResistanceInfection Control in Healthcare

National Burden of Invasive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections, United States, 2011

Open access
Dantes, Raymund·2013·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Estimating the US burden of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections is important for planning and tracking success of prevention strategies. OBJECTIVE: To describe updated national estimates and characteristics of health care- and community-associated invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in 2011. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Active laboratory-based case finding identified MRSA cultures in 9 US metropolitan areas from 2005 through 2011. Invasive infections (MRSA cultured from normally sterile body sites) were classified as health care-associated community-onset (HACO) infections (cultured ≤ 3 days after admission and/or prior year dialysis, hospitalization, surgery, long-term care residence, or central vascular catheter presence ≤ 2 days before culture); hospital-onset infections (cultured >3 days after admission); or community-associated infections if no other criteria were met. National estimates were adjusted using US census and US Renal Data System data. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: National estimates of invasive HACO, hospital-onset, and community-associated MRSA infections using US census and US Renal Data System data as the denominator. RESULTS: An estimated 80,461 (95% CI, 69,515-93,914) invasive MRSA infections occurred nationally in 2011. Of these, 48,353 (95% CI, 40,195-58,642) were HACO infections; 14,156 (95% CI, 10,096-20,440) were hospital-onset infections; and 16,560 (95% CI, 12,806-21,811) were community-associated infections. Since 2005, adjusted national estimated incidence rates decreased among HACO infections by 27.7% and hospital-onset infections decreased by 54.2%; community-associated infections decreased by only 5.0%. Among recently hospitalized community-onset (nondialysis) infections, 64% occurred 3 months or less after discharge, and 32% of these were admitted from long-term care facilities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: An estimated 30,800 fewer invasive MRSA infections occurred in the United States in 2011 compared with 2005; in 2011 fewer infections occurred among patients during hospitalization than among persons in the community without recent health care exposures. Effective strategies for preventing infections outside acute care settings will have the greatest impact on further reducing invasive MRSA infections nationally.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10423

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because the populations under surveillance in the 9 EIP sites are diverse, EIP findings can and have been used to extrapolate to national estimates of other infections.

    “Furthermore, because the populations under surveillance in the 9 sites are diverse (by age distribution, race, urban/rural, and other factors), EIP findings can and have been used to extrapolate to national estimates of other infections [33,34].”

    From Burden of Candidemia in the United States, 2017 (2020) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Discussion describes diverse populations in several metropolitan surveillance areas, and Methods > Statistical Analysis explains how EIP-ABCs data were extrapolated to national estimates of invasive MRSA. The paper does not establish that the sites are diverse by urban/rural status or that EIP findings have been used to estimate other infections nationally. It also cautions that the sites were not randomly selected to be representative. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [1]Hidron AI, Edwards JR, Patel J,; National Healthcare Safety Network Team; Participating National Healthcare Safety Network Facilities. NHSN annual update: antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare–associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006–2007. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008; 29(11): 996– 1011. 18947320
  2. [3]Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J,; Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs) MRSA Investigators. Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. JAMA. 2007; 298(15): 1763– 1771. 17940231
  3. [4]Weber JT. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41(suppl 4): S269– S272. 16032563
  4. [5]Talan DA, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ,; EMERGEncy ID Net Study Group. Comparison of Staphylococcus aureus from skin and soft-tissue infections in US emergency department patients, 2004 and 2008. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 53(2): 144– 149. 21690621
  5. [6]Klein E, Smith DL, Laxminarayan R. Hospitalizations and deaths caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, United States, 1999–2005. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007; 13(12): 1840– 1846. 18258033 PMC2876761
  6. [7]David MZ, Medvedev S, Hohmann SF, Ewigman B, Daum RS. Increasing burden of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus hospitalizations at US academic medical centers, 2003–2008. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012; 33(8): 782– 789. 22759545 PMC3682488
  7. [8]Burton DC, Edwards JR, Horan TC, Jernigan JA, Fridkin SK. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus central line-associated bloodstream infections in US intensive care units, 1997–2007. JAMA. 2009; 301(7): 727– 736. 19224749
  8. [9]Landrum ML, Neumann C, Cook C, Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus blood and skin and soft tissue infections in the US military health system, 2005–2010. JAMA. 2012; 308(1): 50– 59. 22760291
  9. [10]Patel PR, Kallen AJ, Arduino MJ. Epidemiology, surveillance, and prevention of bloodstream infections in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010; 56(3): 566– 577. 20554361
  10. [12]Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(5): 373– 383. 3558716
  11. [19]Fay MP, Feuer EJ. Confidence intervals for directly standardized rates: a method based on the gamma distribution. Stat Med. 1997; 16(7): 791– 801. 9131766
  12. [20]Hadler JL, Petit S, Mandour M, Cartter ML. Trends in invasive infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Connecticut, USA, 2001–2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012; 18(6): 917– 924. 22607942 PMC3358174
  13. [27]Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: executive summary. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52(3): 285– 292. 21217178

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dantes, R.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Dantes, Raymund
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2013-09-16
Volume
173
Issue
21
Pages
1970-8
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137893923
Cited by
452
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 4
FWCI
40.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, invasive MRSA infections, nosocomial infections, community-associated infections, hospital-onset infection, long-term care facilities, dialysis-associated infection, infection control, United States, incidence trends, laboratory surveillance, active case finding, dialysis patients
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross Infection, Female, Renal Dialysis, Hospitalization, Humans, Infant, Long-Term Care, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Homes, Risk Factors, Staphylococcal Infections, United States, Cost of Illness, Community-Acquired Infections, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review