Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 455

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Atrial Fibrillation and the Risk of Myocardial Infarction

Open access
Soliman, Elsayed Z., Safford, Monika M., Muntner, Paul, Khodneva, Yulia, Dawood, Farah Z., Zakai, Neil A., Thacker, Evan L., Judd, Suzanne, Howard, Virginia J., Howard, George, Herrington, David M., Cushman, Mary·2014·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Myocardial infarction (MI) is an established risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the extent to which AF is a risk factor for MI has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: To examine the risk of incident MI associated with AF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective cohort of 23,928 participants residing in the continental United States and without coronary heart disease at baseline were enrolled from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort between 2003 and 2007, with follow-up through December 2009. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Expert-adjudicated total MI events (fatal and nonfatal). RESULTS: Over 6.9 years of follow-up (median 4.5 years), 648 incident MI events occurred. In a sociodemographic-adjusted model, AF was associated with about 2-fold increased risk of MI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.96 [95% CI, 1.52-2.52]). This association remained significant (HR, 1.70 [95% CI, 1.26-2.30]) after further adjustment for total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, blood pressure-lowering drugs, body mass index, diabetes, warfarin use, aspirin use, statin use, history of stroke and vascular disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate, albumin to creatinine ratio, and C-reactive protein level. In subgroup analysis, the risk of MI associated with AF was significantly higher in women (HR, 2.16 [95% CI, 1.41-3.31]) than in men (HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.91-2.10]) and in blacks (HR, 2.53 [95% CI, 1.67-3.86]) than in whites (HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 0.83-1.93]); for interactions, P = .03 and P = .02, respectively. On the other hand, there were no significant differences in the risk of MI associated with AF in older (≥75 years) vs younger (<75 years) participants (HR, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.16-3.35] and HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.11-2.30], respectively); for interaction, P = .44. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: AF is independently associated with an increased risk of incident MI, especially in women and blacks. These findings add to the growing concerns of the seriousness of AF as a public health burden: in addition to being a well-known risk factor for stroke, AF is also associated with increased risk of MI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11912

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 455

Metadata

Authors
Soliman, E. Z., Safford, M. M., Muntner, P., Khodneva, Y., Dawood, F. Z., Zakai, N. A., Thacker, E. L., Judd, S., Howard, V. J., Howard, G., Herrington, D. M., & Cushman, M.
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2014-01-01
Volume
174
Issue
1
Pages
107
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966297507
Cited by
455
References
7
FWCI
22.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atrial Fibrillation and the Risk of Myocardial Infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11912
The paper
Soliman, E. Z., Safford, M. M., Muntner, P., Khodneva, Y., Dawood, F. Z., Zakai, N. A., Thacker, E. L., Judd, S., Howard, V. J., Howard, G., Herrington, D. M., & Cushman, M. (2014). Atrial Fibrillation and the Risk of Myocardial Infarction. JAMA Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11912

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.