Cited by 1,425Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease PrognosisBlood properties and coagulation

Inflammation as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation

Aviles, Ronnier J., Martin, David O., Apperson-Hansen, Carolyn, Houghtaling, Penny L., Rautaharju, Pentti, Kronmal, Richard A., Tracy, Russell P., Van Wagoner, David R. +3 more·2003·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The presence of systemic inflammation determined by elevations in C-reactive protein (CRP) has been associated with persistence of atrial fibrillation (AF). The relationship between CRP and prediction of AF has not been studied in a large population-based cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: CRP measurement and cardiovascular assessment were performed at baseline in 5806 subjects enrolled in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Patients were followed up for a mean of 6.9+/-1.6 (median 7.8) years. AF was identified by self-reported history and ECGs at baseline and by ECGs and hospital discharge diagnoses at follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess CRP as a predictor of baseline and future development of AF. At baseline, 315 subjects (5%) had AF. Compared with subjects in the first CRP quartile (<0.97 mg/L), subjects in the fourth quartile (>3.41 mg/L) had more AF (7.4% versus 3.7%, adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.5; P=0.002). Of 5491 subjects without AF at baseline, 897 (16%) developed AF during follow-up. Baseline CRP predicted higher risk for developing future AF (fourth versus first quartile adjusted hazard ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.58; P=0.005). When treated as a continuous variable, elevated CRP predicted increased risk for developing future AF (adjusted hazard ratio for 1-SD increase, 1.24; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.40; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CRP is not only associated with the presence of AF but may also predict patients at increased risk for future development of AF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000103131.70301.4f

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although biomarkers such as natriuretic peptides are elevated in AF patients, there is insufficient data to suggest that blood-based parameters are independent markers for AF.

    “Although biomarkers such as natriuretic peptides are elevated in AF patients, there is insufficient data to suggest that blood-based parameters are independent markers for AF.”
  • In men, a U-shaped association has been reported between physical activity and AF, in which sedentary lifestyle and vigorous exercise both are associated with increased AF risk, whereas moderate activity is protective.

    “In men, a U-shaped association has been reported, in which sedentary lifestyle and vigorous exercise both are associated with increased AF risk,41,44,45 whereas moderate activity is protective.46”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aviles, R. J., Martin, D. O., Apperson-Hansen, C., Houghtaling, P. L., Rautaharju, P., Kronmal, R. A., Tracy, R. P., Van Wagoner, D. R., Psaty, B. M., Lauer, M. S., & Chung, M. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.J.A., D.O.M., D.R.V.W., M.S.L., M.K.C.), Department of Biostatistics (C.A.-H., P.L.H.), The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; Cardiovascular Health Research Unit (B.M.P.), University of Washington, Seattle, Wash; Wake Forest University School of Medicine (P.R.), Winston-Salem, NC; Department of Pathology and Biochemistry, (R.P.T.), University of Vermont, Colchester, Vt; and the CHS Coordinating Center (R.A.K.), Seattle, Wash. Dr Aviles is...
Venue
Circulation
Published
2003-12-16
Volume
108
Issue
24
Pages
3006-3010
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2120386224
Cited by
1,425
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 78
FWCI
25.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc085082-026, n01hc085081-021, n01hc085079-024, n01hc015103-009, n01hc085084-005, n01hc085085-011, n01hc085083-027, n01hc085080-026, n01hc085086-022, n01hc035129-010)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HC-85081, N01HC85085, N01HC-85083, N01HC15103, N01HC85082, N01 HC85086, N01HC85080, HL-65412, R01HL065412, N01-HC85079, ­N01-HC85084, N01HC35129)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Blood properties and coagulation
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, C-reactive protein, systemic inflammation, risk prediction, Cardiovascular Health Study, cardiovascular risk factors
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, C-Reactive Protein, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review