Cited by 22Homelessness and Social IssuesEmergency and Acute Care StudiesPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Use of acute care services among older homeless adults

Open access
Brown, Rebecca T., Kiely, Dan K., Bharel, Monica, Grande, Laura J., Mitchell, Susan L.·2013·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

There were several limitations of the present study. First, the study cohort was highly educated, numerate, and well insured, with a higher than average income level, thus differing from a population-based cohort of patients with DCIS. Second, we administered hypothetical scenarios to individuals personally not diagnosed as having DCIS. While it is possible that patients with DCIS may react differently to the survey, the use of hypothetical scenarios allowed us to explore women’s preferences toward systemic therapy and active surveillance, unbiased by previous knowledge regarding DCIS and standard modes of treatment options. Finally, the projected outcomes in the scenarios were generalized and static, whereas true outcomes vary depending on patient age, tumor grade, and other case-specific factors. We conclude that the terminology used to describe DCIS has a significant and important impact on patients’ perceptions of treatment alternatives. Health care providers who use “cancer” to describe DCIS must be particularly assiduous in ensuring that patients understand the important distinctions between DCIS and invasive cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6627

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Small studies show that homeless people are open to both behavioural and pharmaceutical help with quitting smoking.

    “Findings from small studies111,114,115 of smoking cessation in homeless populations have shown that homeless individuals are receptive to both behavioural and pharmaceutical assistance with smoking cessation.”

    From The health of homeless people in high-income countries: descriptive epidemiology, health consequences, and clinical and policy recommendations (2014) · cites this paper as [114]

    The Methods and Results describe emergency-department visits and hospitalizations among older homeless adults, not smoking-cessation studies. Searches for smoking cessation, tobacco, nicotine, and quitting found no passage in our copy addressing receptiveness to behavioural or pharmaceutical assistance. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, R. T., Kiely, D. K., Bharel, M., Grande, L. J., & Mitchell, S. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Hebrew SeniorLife (US)
  • Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program (US)
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Rebecca T.
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2013-10-28
Volume
173
Issue
19
Pages
1831
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980700646
Cited by
22
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K24AG033640, T32AG000212, P30AG044281)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
acute care services, health care utilization, homelessness
MeSH terms
Aged, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review