Cited by 615Homelessness and Social IssuesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Health care and public service use and costs before and after provision of housing for chronically homeless persons with severe alcohol problems

Open access
Larimer, Mary E.·2009·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Chronically homeless individuals with severe alcohol problems often have multiple medical and psychiatric problems and use costly health and criminal justice services at high rates. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate association of a "Housing First" intervention for chronically homeless individuals with severe alcohol problems with health care use and costs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Quasi-experimental design comparing 95 housed participants (with drinking permitted) with 39 wait-list control participants enrolled between November 2005 and March 2007 in Seattle, Washington. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use and cost of services (jail bookings, days incarcerated, shelter and sobering center use, hospital-based medical services, publicly funded alcohol and drug detoxification and treatment, emergency medical services, and Medicaid-funded services) for Housing First participants relative to wait-list controls. RESULTS: Housing First participants had total costs of $8,175,922 in the year prior to the study, or median costs of $4066 per person per month (interquartile range [IQR], $2067-$8264). Median monthly costs decreased to $1492 (IQR, $337-$5709) and $958 (IQR, $98-$3200) after 6 and 12 months in housing, respectively. Poisson generalized estimating equation regressions using propensity score adjustments showed total cost rate reduction of 53% for housed participants relative to wait-list controls (rate ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.88) over the first 6 months. Total cost offsets for Housing First participants relative to controls averaged $2449 per person per month after accounting for housing program costs. CONCLUSIONS: In this population of chronically homeless individuals with high service use and costs, a Housing First program was associated with a relative decrease in costs after 6 months. These benefits increased to the extent that participants were retained in housing longer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2009.414

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings from a single-site Housing First program for chronically homeless adults with severe alcohol use problems in Seattle found a significant decrease in alcohol-related problems and days intoxicated up to 24 months among Housing First participants.

    “Findings from a single-site Housing First program for chronically homeless adults with severe alcohol use problems in Seattle found a significant decrease in alcohol-related problems and days intoxicated up to 24 months among Housing First participants (Collins et al., 2012c; Larimer et al., 2009).”

    From Harm reduction outcomes and practices in Housing First: A mixed-methods systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Larimer et al., 2009

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In chronically homeless individuals with severe alcohol problems who frequently use crisis services, the HF group was significantly less likely to use sobering centers at 6 months than the WL group.

    “HF group was significantly less likely to use sobering centers at 6 months than WL group”

    From Harm reduction outcomes and practices in Housing First: A mixed-methods systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Larimer et al. (2009)

    The study compares Housing First participants with wait-list controls and includes sobering-center use among its outcomes (Abstract). The section ‘Comparison of HF and Control Participants at 6 Months’ reports a significant difference in total costs, but the passages available from our copy do not establish that the Housing First group was significantly less likely to use sobering centers. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In chronically homeless individuals with severe alcohol problems who frequently use crisis services, detoxification days did not significantly differ between the HF and WL groups.

    “Detoxification days did not significantly differ between the two groups”

    From Harm reduction outcomes and practices in Housing First: A mixed-methods systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Larimer et al. (2009)

    Table 3 reports a median of 0.0 detoxification-center contacts per person per month in both the housed and wait-list groups at six months. The Comparison of HF and Control Participants at 6 Months section says Figure 2 tests treatment differences, but our copy does not preserve a readable result for detoxification days, so it does not establish whether that difference was statistically nonsignificant. The separate finding about detoxification days and length of time housed is not a between-group comparison. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This study extended the 1-year findings of Larimer and colleagues by showing that decreases in EMS utilization were maintained over a 2-year period.

    “This study thereby extended the 1-year findings of Larimer and colleagues29 by demonstrating that decreases in EMS utilization were maintained over a 2-year period.”
  • The first study focused exclusively on single-site HF found significantly reduced publicly funded service utilization, including EMS, ED visits, and inpatient hospital admissions one year after housing provision.

    “The first study that focused exclusively on single-site HF showed significantly reduced publicly funded service utilization, including EMS, ED visits, and inpatient hospital admissions one year after housing provision.29”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. O'Connell JJ. Premature Mortality in Homeless Populations: A Review of the Literature. Nashville, TN: National Health Care for the Homeless Council, Inc; 2005.
  2. Troyer-Merkel M. A Comprehensive Review of Treatment and Service Programs Used by Seattle's Downtown Public Indigent Alcoholics: A Report to the Mayor. Seattle, WA: Office of Management and Budget, City of Seattle; 1986.
  3. Svoboda T. Measuring the "Reduction" in a Harm Reduction Program for Homeless Men Experiencing Harms Related to Alcohol Abuse and Problem Be- haviors [thesis]. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto; 2006.
  4. Pearson CL, Locke G, Montgomery AE, Buron L. The Applicability of Housing First Models to Home- less Persons With Serious Mental Illness: Final Report. Washington, DC: US Dept of Housing and Urban De- velopment, Office of Policy Development and Re- search; 2007.
  5. Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline followback: a tech- nique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In: Litten RZ, Allen J, eds. Measuring Alcohol Con- sumption: Psychosocial and Biological Methods. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1992:41-72.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larimer, M. E.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Larimer, Mary E.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2009-04-01
Volume
301
Issue
13
Pages
1349
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2128336124
Cited by
615
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 44
FWCI
62.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Washington Tacoma Digital Commons (University of Washington Tacoma) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k05aa000113-20)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (2K05AA00113-17, T32AA007455)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01DA014685)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
Housing First, chronic homelessness, health care costs, health care utilization, incarceration, emergency medical services, Medicaid, housing retention, cost offsets
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Community Health Services, Community Mental Health Services, Emergency Medical Services, Female, Health Services, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prisons, Public Housing, Time Factors, Washington, Program Evaluation, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Health Care Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review