The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Medication Therapy Management Interventions in Outpatient Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Medication therapy management (MTM) services (also called clinical pharmacy services) aim to reduce medication-related problems and their downstream outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of MTM interventions among outpatients with chronic illnesses. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts through January 9, 2014. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers selected studies with comparators and eligible outcomes of ambulatory adults. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Dual review of titles, abstracts, full-text, extractions, risk of bias, and strength of evidence grading. We conducted meta-analyses using random-effects models. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Medication-related problems, morbidity, mortality, quality of life, health care use, costs, and harms. RESULTS: Forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. The evidence was insufficient to determine the effect of MTM interventions on most evaluated outcomes (eg, drug therapy problems, adverse drug events, disease-specific morbidity, disease-specific or all-cause mortality, and harms). The interventions improved a few measures of medication-related problems and health care use and costs (low strength of evidence) when compared with usual care. Specifically, MTM interventions improved medication appropriateness (4.9 vs 0.9 points on the medication appropriateness index, P < .001), adherence (approximately 4.6%), and percentage of patients achieving a threshold adherence level (odds ratios [ORs] ranged from 0.99 to 5.98) and reduced medication dosing (mean difference, -2.2 doses; 95% CI, -3.738 to -0.662). Medication therapy management interventions reduced health plan expenditures on medication costs, although the studies reported wide CIs. For patients with diabetes mellitus or heart failure, MTM interventions lowered the odds of hospitalization (diabetes: OR, 0.91 to 0.93 based on type of insurance; adjusted hazard rate for heart failure: 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77) and hospitalization costs (mean differences ranged from -$363.45 to -$398.98). The interventions conferred no benefit for patient satisfaction and most measures of health-related quality of life (low strength). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We graded the evidence as insufficient for most outcomes because of inconsistency and imprecision that stem in part from underlying heterogeneity in populations and interventions. Medication therapy management interventions may reduce the frequency of some medication-related problems, including nonadherence, and lower some health care use and costs, but the evidence is insufficient with respect to improvement in health outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., Sterne, J. A. C., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928 · Cited by 33,817
To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System
(2000) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/9728 · Cited by 14,044
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
(2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490 · Cited by 8,477
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States
McGlynn, E. A., Asch, S. M., Adams, J., Keesey, J., Hicks, J., DeCristofaro, A., & Kerr, E. A. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa022615 · Cited by 5,079
Des Jarlais, D. C., Lyles, C., Crepaz, N., & the TREND Group (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.3.361 · Cited by 2,817
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Alonso-Coello, P., Montori, V., Akl, E. A., Djulbegovic, B., & Falck-Ytter, Y. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017 · Cited by 2,798
Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Ravaud, P., & for the CONSORT Group* (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008 · Cited by 2,292
The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review
Brown, C. A., & Lilford, R. J. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-54 · Cited by 907
Hanlon, J. T., Weinberger, M., Samsa, G. P., Schmader, K. E., Uttech, K. M., Lewis, I. K., Cowper, P. A., Landsman, P. B., Cohen, H. J., & Feussner, J. R. (1996) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(97)89519-8 · Cited by 612
Cited by
Choudhry, N. K., Kronish, I. M., Vongpatanasin, W., Ferdinand, K. C., Pavlik, V. N., Egan, B. M., Schoenthaler, A., Houston Miller, N., Hyman, D. J., & on behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Hypertension; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; and Council on Clinical Cardiology (2022) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hyp.0000000000000203 · Cited by 349
Risk Factors for Nonadherence to Antihypertensive Treatment
Gupta, P., Patel, P., Štrauch, B., Lai, F. Y., Akbarov, A., Marešová, V., White, C. M. J., Petrák, O., Gulsin, G. S., Patel, V., et al. (2017) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.116.08729 · Cited by 256
Effectiveness and Safety of Dementia Care Management in Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Thyrian, J. R., Hertel, J., Wucherer, D., Eichler, T., Michalowsky, B., Dreier-Wolfgramm, A., Zwingmann, I., Kilimann, I., Teipel, S., & Hoffmann, W. (2017) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2124 · Cited by 190
Gupta, P., Patel, P., Štrauch, B., Lai, F. Y., Akbarov, A., Gulsin, G. S., Beech, A., Marešová, V., Topham, P. S., Stanley, A., et al. (2017) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.117.09631 · Cited by 194
Hohmeier, K. C., Wheeler, J. S., Turner, K., Vick, J. S., Marchetti, M. L., Crain, J., & Brookhart, A. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0946-7 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Viswanathan, M., Kahwati, L. C., Golin, C. E., Blalock, S. J., Coker-Schwimmer, E., Posey, R., & Lohr, K. N.
- Venue
- JAMA Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2015-01-01
- Volume
- 175
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76
- ISSN
- 2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1582000974
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 12.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medication Therapy Management Interventions in Outpatient Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5841
- The paper
- Viswanathan, M., Kahwati, L. C., Golin, C. E., Blalock, S. J., Coker-Schwimmer, E., Posey, R., & Lohr, K. N. (2015). Medication Therapy Management Interventions in Outpatient Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5841
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.