Cited by 907Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsHealth Policy Implementation ScienceAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review

Open access
Brown, Celia A, Lilford, Richard J·2006·BMC Medical Research Methodology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stepped wedge randomised trial designs involve sequential roll-out of an intervention to participants (individuals or clusters) over a number of time periods. By the end of the study, all participants will have received the intervention, although the order in which participants receive the intervention is determined at random. The design is particularly relevant where it is predicted that the intervention will do more good than harm (making a parallel design, in which certain participants do not receive the intervention unethical) and/or where, for logistical, practical or financial reasons, it is impossible to deliver the intervention simultaneously to all participants. Stepped wedge designs offer a number of opportunities for data analysis, particularly for modelling the effect of time on the effectiveness of an intervention. This paper presents a review of 12 studies (or protocols) that use (or plan to use) a stepped wedge design. One aim of the review is to highlight the potential for the stepped wedge design, given its infrequent use to date. METHODS: Comprehensive literature review of studies or protocols using a stepped wedge design. Data were extracted from the studies in three categories for subsequent consideration: study information (epidemiology, intervention, number of participants), reasons for using a stepped wedge design and methods of data analysis. RESULTS: The 12 studies included in this review describe evaluations of a wide range of interventions, across different diseases in different settings. However the stepped wedge design appears to have found a niche for evaluating interventions in developing countries, specifically those concerned with HIV. There were few consistent motivations for employing a stepped wedge design or methods of data analysis across studies. The methodological descriptions of stepped wedge studies, including methods of randomisation, sample size calculations and methods of analysis, are not always complete. CONCLUSION: While the stepped wedge design offers a number of opportunities for use in future evaluations, a more consistent approach to reporting and data analysis is required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2288-6-54

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analyses of stepped-wedge trials can be complex due to time-varying effects and intra-cluster correlation, requiring appropriate analytic approaches.

    “In addition, contamination between participants who have received the intervention and those awaiting roll-out may occur, and analyses can be complex due to time-varying effects and intra-cluster correlation, requiring appropriate analytic approaches (3, 8, 16, 19).”

    From Applications and implementation considerations for stepped-wedge designs in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Conclusion (page not available in our copy) identifies controlling for changes in outcomes over time as a statistical challenge and calls for a model that considers time. It also mentions repeated measures on the same individuals, but does not identify intra-cluster correlation as a source of analytic complexity. The Methods of data analysis section reports varied analytic approaches. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The primary motivations for employing the SWD in SSA research are to address ethical concerns regarding withholding potentially beneficial interventions and to manage the logistical challenges of simultaneous intervention implementation across diverse, resource-limited settings.

    “The primary motivations for employing the SWD in SSA research are to address ethical concerns regarding withholding potentially beneficial interventions and to manage the logistical challenges of simultaneous intervention implementation across diverse, resource-limited settings (3, 13, 18, 20).”

    From Applications and implementation considerations for stepped-wedge designs in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as [3]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The phased approach of SWD allows for adjustments based on initial findings, enhancing the intervention's overall effectiveness.

    “The phased approach allows for adjustments based on initial findings, enhancing the intervention's overall effectiveness (3, 12, 20–22).”

    From Applications and implementation considerations for stepped-wedge designs in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Background (page not specified) describes sequential rollout and data collection at each step. It does not say that initial findings are used to adjust the intervention or that such adjustments enhance its effectiveness; the Conclusion discusses measuring whether the timing of intervention affects effectiveness, not improving it during rollout. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Stepped-wedge trials can extend study duration compared with traditional parallel designs, particularly when outcomes are measured shortly after implementation.

    “Stepped-wedge trials can also extend study duration compared with traditional parallel designs, particularly when outcomes are measured shortly after implementation (2, 3, 15).”
  • Contamination between participants who have received the intervention and those awaiting roll-out may occur in stepped-wedge trials.

    “In addition, contamination between participants who have received the intervention and those awaiting roll-out may occur, and analyses can be complex due to time-varying effects and intra-cluster correlation, requiring appropriate analytic approaches (3, 8, 16, 19).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, C. A., & Lilford, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Brown, Celia A
Venue
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published
2006-11-08
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
54-54
ISSN
1471-2288 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101754128
Cited by
907
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 34
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Research Methodology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
stepped wedge design, HIV interventions, developing countries, randomization methods, sample size determination, data analysis methods, reporting quality
MeSH terms
Clinical Protocols, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Developing Countries, Humans, Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review