Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Incorporating Individual Patient Data

Open access
Beveridge, Louise A., Struthers, Allan D., Khan, Faisel, Jorde, Rolf, Scragg, Robert, Macdonald, Helen M., Alvarez, Jessica A., Boxer, Rebecca S., Dalbeni, Andrea, Gepner, Adam D., Isbel, Nicole M., Larsen, Thomas, Nagpal, Jitender, Petchey, William G., Stricker, Hans, Strobel, Franziska, Tangpricha, Vin, Toxqui, Laura, Vaquero, M. Pilar, Wamberg, Louise, Zittermann, Armin, Witham, Miles D., D-PRESSURE Collaboration·2015·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

Importance: Low levels of vitamin D are associated with elevated blood pressure (BP) and future cardiovascular events. Whether vitamin D supplementation reduces BP and which patient characteristics predict a response remain unclear. Objective: To systematically review whether supplementation with vitamin D or its analogues reduce BP. Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and http://www.ClinicalTrials.com augmented by a hand search of references from the included articles and previous reviews. Google was searched for gray literature (ie, material not published in recognized scientific journals). No language restrictions were applied. The search period spanned January 1, 1966, through March 31, 2014. Study Selection: We included randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials that used vitamin D supplementation for a minimum of 4 weeks for any indication and reported BP data. Studies were included if they used active or inactive forms of vitamin D or vitamin D analogues. Cointerventions were permitted if identical in all treatment arms. Data Extraction and Synthesis: We extracted data on baseline demographics, 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP), and change in BP from baseline to the final follow-up. Individual patient data on age, sex, medication use, diabetes mellitus, baseline and follow-up BP, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were requested from the authors of the included studies. For trial-level data, between-group differences in BP change were combined in a random-effects model. For individual patient data, between-group differences in BP at the final follow up, adjusted for baseline BP, were calculated before combining in a random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Difference in SBP and DBP measured in an office setting. Results: We included 46 trials (4541 participants) in the trial-level meta-analysis. Individual patient data were obtained for 27 trials (3092 participants). At the trial level, no effect of vitamin D supplementation was seen on SBP (effect size, 0.0 [95% CI, −0.8 to 0.8] mm Hg; P = .97; I 2 = 21%) or DBP (effect size, −0.1 [95% CI, −0.6 to 0.5] mm Hg; P = .84; I 2 = 20%). Similar results were found analyzing individual patient data for SBP (effect size, −0.5 [95% CI, −1.3 to 0.4] mm Hg; P = .27; I 2 = 0%) and DBP (effect size, 0.2 [95% CI, −0.3 to 0.7] mm Hg; P = .38; I 2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis did not reveal any baseline factor predictive of a better response to therapy. Conclusions and Relevance: Vitamin D supplementation is ineffective as an agent for lowering BP and thus should not be used as an antihypertensive agent.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0237

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 75 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Beveridge, L. A., Struthers, A. D., Khan, F., Jorde, R., Scragg, R., Macdonald, H. M., Alvarez, J. A., Boxer, R. S., Dalbeni, A., Gepner, A. D., Isbel, N. M., Larsen, T., Nagpal, J., Petchey, W. G., Stricker, H., Strobel, F., Tangpricha, V., Toxqui, L., Vaquero, M. P., Wamberg, L., Zittermann, A., Witham, M. D., & D-PRESSURE Collaboration
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2015-05-01
Volume
175
Issue
5
Pages
745
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129501418
Cited by
309
References
75
FWCI
35.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Incorporating Individual Patient Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0237
The paper
Beveridge, L. A., Struthers, A. D., Khan, F., Jorde, R., Scragg, R., Macdonald, H. M., Alvarez, J. A., Boxer, R. S., Dalbeni, A., Gepner, A. D., Isbel, N. M., Larsen, T., Nagpal, J., Petchey, W. G., Stricker, H., Strobel, F., Tangpricha, V., Toxqui, L., Vaquero, M. P., . . . D-PRESSURE Collaboration. (2015). Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Incorporating Individual Patient Data. JAMA Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0237

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.