Cited by 2,414Vitamin D Research StudiesBone health and osteoporosis researchNutrition and Health Studies

Estimation of optimal serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for multiple health outcomes

Open access
Bischoff-Ferrari, Heike A, Giovannucci, Edward, Willett, Walter C, Dietrich, Thomas, Dawson-Hughes, Bess·2006·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that vitamin D intakes above current recommendations may be associated with better health outcomes. However, optimal serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] have not been defined. This review summarizes evidence from studies that evaluated thresholds for serum 25(OH)D concentrations in relation to bone mineral density (BMD), lower-extremity function, dental health, and risk of falls, fractures, and colorectal cancer. For all endpoints, the most advantageous serum concentrations of 25(OH)D begin at 75 nmol/L (30 ng/mL), and the best are between 90 and 100 nmol/L (36-40 ng/mL). In most persons, these concentrations could not be reached with the currently recommended intakes of 200 and 600 IU vitamin D/d for younger and older adults, respectively. A comparison of vitamin D intakes with achieved serum concentrations of 25(OH)D for the purpose of estimating optimal intakes led us to suggest that, for bone health in younger adults and all studied outcomes in older adults, an increase in the currently recommended intake of vitamin D is warranted. An intake for all adults of > or =1000 IU (25 microg) [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] vitamin D (cholecalciferol)/d is needed to bring vitamin D concentrations in no less than 50% of the population up to 75 nmol/L. The implications of higher doses for the entire adult population should be addressed in future studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/84.1.18

Cites

155 of 155 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consequences of prolonged stark vitamin D deficiency (serum 25(OH)D <30 nmol/L) can result in inadequate bone mineralization and osteomalacia.

    “Consequences of (prolonged) stark vitamin D deficiency (serum 25(OH)D <30 nmol/L) can result in inadequate bone mineralization [293] and osteomalacia (a disorder in which bones are softened).”

    From Nutritional Considerations for the Vegan Athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [293]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Malabanan A, Veronikis IE, Holick MF. Redefining vitamin D insuf- ficiency. Lancet 1998;351:805-6.
  2. Lane NE, Gore LR, Cummings SR, et al. Serum vitamin D levels and incident changes of radiographic hip osteoarthritis: a longitudinal study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:854 -60.
  3. Zehnder D, Bland R, Williams MC, et al. Extrarenal expression of 25-hydroxyvitamin d(3)-1 alpha-hydroxylase. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:888 -94.
  4. Ritchie CS, Joshipura K, Hung HC, Douglass CW. Nutrition as a mediator in the relation between oral and systemic disease: associations between specific measures of adult oral health and nutrition outcomes. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2002;13:291-300.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bischoff-Ferrari, H. A., Giovannucci, E., Willett, W. C., Dietrich, T., & Dawson-Hughes, B.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Bischoff-Ferrari, Heike A
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-07
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
18-28
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099665543
Cited by
2,414
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 108 · 2016: 141 · 2015: 159 · 2014: 157 · 2013: 190 · 2012: 191
FWCI
100.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Hartford Foundation for Public Giving
  • Stiftung zur Förderung der Ernährungsforschung in der Schweiz
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
25-hydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D supplementation, vitamin D intake recommendations, bone mineral density, lower limb function, dental health, falls and fractures, colorectal cancer, older adults, vitamin D dose
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Osteoporosis, Periodontal Diseases, Risk Factors, Vitamin D, Colorectal Neoplasms, Bone Density, Nutrition Policy, Bone Density Conservation Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review