Cited by 678Digital Radiography and Breast ImagingAI in cancer detectionGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection

Open access

Lehman, Constance D., Wellman, Robert D., Buist, Diana S. M., Kerlikowske, Karla, Tosteson, Anna N. A., Miglioretti, Diana L.·2015·JAMA Internal Medicine

DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5231PMC PMC4836172

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: After the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved computer-aided detection (CAD) for mammography in 1998, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) provided increased payment in 2002, CAD technology disseminated rapidly. Despite sparse evidence that CAD improves accuracy of mammographic interpretations and costs over $400 million a year, CAD is currently used for most screening mammograms in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To measure performance of digital screening mammography with and without CAD in US community practice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We compared the accuracy of digital screening mammography interpreted with (n = 495 818) vs without (n = 129 807) CAD from 2003 through 2009 in 323 973 women. Mammograms were interpreted by 271 radiologists from 66 facilities in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Linkage with tumor registries identified 3159 breast cancers in 323 973 women within 1 year of the screening. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mammography performance (sensitivity, specificity, and screen-detected and interval cancers per 1000 women) was modeled using logistic regression with radiologist-specific random effects to account for correlation among examinations interpreted by the same radiologist, adjusting for patient age, race/ethnicity, time since prior mammogram, examination year, and registry. Conditional logistic regression was used to compare performance among 107 radiologists who interpreted mammograms both with and without CAD. RESULTS: Screening performance was not improved with CAD on any metric assessed. Mammography sensitivity was 85.3% (95% CI, 83.6%-86.9%) with and 87.3% (95% CI, 84.5%-89.7%) without CAD. Specificity was 91.6% (95% CI, 91.0%-92.2%) with and 91.4% (95% CI, 90.6%-92.0%) without CAD. There was no difference in cancer detection rate (4.1 in 1000 women screened with and without CAD). Computer-aided detection did not improve intraradiologist performance. Sensitivity was significantly decreased for mammograms interpreted with vs without CAD in the subset of radiologists who interpreted both with and without CAD (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.97). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Computer-aided detection does not improve diagnostic accuracy of mammography. These results suggest that insurers pay more for CAD with no established benefit to women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5231

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction
PEPE, M. S. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198509844.001.0001 · Cited by 2,206
Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS)
Liberman, L., & Menell, J. H. (2002) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0033-8389(01)00017-3 · Cited by 2,159
The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction
PEPE, M. S. (2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s278 · Cited by 1,907
A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations
Rutter, C. M., & Gatsonis, C. (2001) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.942 · Cited by 1,510
Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System
Berg, W. A., Campassi, C., LANGENBERG, P. W., & Sexton, M. J. (2000) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741769 · Cited by 1,268
Screening Mammography with Computer-aided Detection: Prospective Study of 12,860 Patients in a Community Breast Center
Freer, T. W., & Ulissey, M. J. (2001) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2203001282 · Cited by 748
Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography
Fenton, J. J., Taplin, S. H., Carney, P. A., Abraham, L., Sickles, E. A., D’Orsi, C. J., Berns, E. A., Cutter, G., Hendrick, R. E., Barlow, W. E., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa066099 · Cited by 619
Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis
Jiang, Y., Nishikawa, R. M., Schmidt, R. A., Metz, C. E., Giger, M. L., & Doi, K. (1999) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/s1076-6332(99)80058-0 · Cited by 310
Changes in Breast Cancer Detection and Mammography Recall Rates After the Introduction of a Computer-Aided Detection System
Gur, D., Sumkin, J. H., Rockette, H. E., Ganott, M. A., Hakim, C. M., Hardesty, L. A., Poller, W. R., Shah, R., & Wallace, L. P. (2004) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djh067 · Cited by 306
Single Reading with Computer-Aided Detection for Screening Mammography
Gilbert, F. J., Astley, S., Gillan, M. G., Agbaje, O. F., Wallis, M., James, J. J., Boggis, C. R. M., & Duffy, S. W. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0803545 · Cited by 296

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 44 references

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 676

Mammography Screening
Meltzer, C., & Skaane, P. (2022) · Medical radiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-94918-1_3 · Cited by 6
The Case of Missed Cancers: Applying AI as a Radiologist’s Safety Net
Chorev, M., Shoshan, Y., Akselrod-Ballin, A., Spiro, A., Naor, S., Hazan, A., Barros, V., Weinstein, I., Herzel, E., Shalev, V., et al. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59725-2_22 · Cited by 7
Replication of an open-access deep learning system for screening mammography: Reduced performance mitigated by retraining on local dataPreprint
Condon, J. J. J., Oakden‐Rayner, L., Hall, K. A., Reintals, M., Holmes, A., Carneiro, G., & Palmer, L. J. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.05.28.21257892 · Cited by 7
Advancing Artificial Intelligence to Meet Breast Imaging Needs
Philpotts, L. E. (2022) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.213101 · Cited by 6
Toward More Equitable Breast Cancer Outcomes
Elmore, J. G., & Lee, C. I. (2024) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2024.6052 · Cited by 6
Are Treatment Services Ready for the Use of Big Data Analytics and AI in Managing Opioid Use Disorder?
Amer, M., Gittins, R., Millana, A. M., Scheibein, F., Ferri, M., Tofighi, B., Sullivan, F., Handley, M., Ghosh, M., Baldacchino, A., et al. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/58723 · Cited by 5
An Intelligent Smart Dynamic Feature Analysis Based Approach by Utilizing Deep Learning to Improve the Breast Cancer Detection
Shim, S., Hussain, L., Alsolami, E., & Alkinani, M. H. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3566353 · Cited by 5
Distinguishing between Rigor and Transparency in FDA Marketing Authorization of AI-enabled Medical Devices
Diab, A. R., & Lotter, W. E. (2025) · Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.250369 · Cited by 8
Confidence in radiology AI: From black-box scores to trusted decisions
Karunanayake, N. (2025) · European Journal of Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.ejrai.2025.100046 · Cited by 5
Self-supervised learning for breast cancer detection: A review
Figueiras, H., Domingues, J., Matela, N., & Garcia, N. C. (2025) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111245 · Cited by 5
A Novel Deep Learning Approach for Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammography
Leung, C. K.-S., & Nguyen, H. H. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE) · doi:10.1109/bibe60311.2023.00052 · Cited by 5
Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Screening: Trade-offs between Sensitivity and Specificity
Bahl, M., & Do, S. (2024) · Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.240184 · Cited by 5
K-Means Clustering and Classification of Breast Cancer Images Using Histogram of Oriented Gradients Features and Convolutional Neural Network Models: Diagnostic Image Analysis Study
Salloum, S. A. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/71974 · Cited by 5
Comparison of performance in breast lesions classification using radiomics and deep transfer learning: an assessment study
Danala, G., Maryada, S. K., Pham, H., Islam, W., Jones, M. A., & Zheng, B. (2022) · SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment · doi:10.1117/12.2611886 · Cited by 5
Deep Learning Hyperparameter Optimization for Breast Mass Detection in Mammograms
Sehgal, A., Sehgal, M., La, H. M., & Bebis, G. N. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20716-7_21 · Cited by 5
Malmö Breast ImaginG database: objectives and development
Dahlblom, V., Dustler, M., Bolejko, A., Bakić, P. R., Granberg, H., Johnson, K., Förnvik, D., Lång, K., Tingberg, A., & Zackrisson, S. (2023) · Journal of medical imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.10.6.061402 · Cited by 5
Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence System for Detection of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma on Digital Mammography
Arce, S., Vijay, A., Yim, E., Spiguel, L. R., & Hanna, M. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.38770 · Cited by 5
Balancing human and AI roles in clinical imaging
Gilbert, F. J. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02441-1 · Cited by 5
Association of Mammography Screening With a Reduction in Breast Cancer Mortality: A Modeling Study Using Population-Based Data From 2 French Departments
Seigneurin, A., Exbrayat, C., Molinié, F., Croisier, L., Poncet, F., Berquet, K., Delafosse, P., & Colonna, M. (2020) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwaa218 · Cited by 5
Comparative study of the digital mammography data analysis system based on artificial intelligence “Celsus” and radiologists
Pavlovich, P. I., Бронов, О., Kapninskiy, A., Abovich, Y. A., & Rychagova, N. I. (2021) · Digital Diagnostics · doi:10.17816/dd83184 · Cited by 5
Impact of a Deep Learning Model for Predicting Mammographic Breast Density in Routine Clinical Practice
Dontchos, B. N., Hom, K. C., Lamb, L. R., Mercaldo, S., Eklund, M., Dang, P. A., & Lehman, C. D. (2022) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2022.04.001 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Artificial intelligence assistance for women who had spot compression view: reducing recall rates for digital mammography
Lee, S. E., Kim, G. R., Yoon, J. H., Han, K., Son, W. J., Shin, H. J., & Moon, H. J. (2022) · Acta Radiologica · doi:10.1177/02841851221140556 · Cited by 5
Primer for Image Informatics in Personalized Medicine
Chang, Y. H., Foley, P., Azimi, V., Borkar, R. N., & Lefman, J. (2016) · Procedia Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.064 · Cited by 5
Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are Poised to Transform Infertility HealthcarePreprint
de Santiago, I., & Polański, Ł. (2020) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202010.0356.v1 · Cited by 5
Using Breast Tissue Information and Subject-Specific Finite-Element Models to Optimize Breast Compression Parameters for Digital Mammography
Chang, T.-Y., Wu, J., Liu, P.-Y., Liu, Y.-L., Luzhbin, D. A., & Lin, H.-C. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11111784 · Cited by 5
Artificial Intelligence‐Driven Decisions in Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Gangwal, A., & Gautam, R. K. (2023) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527841165.ch8 · Cited by 5
Characterizing the clinical adoption of medical AI through U.S. insurance claimsPreprint
Wu, K., Wu, E., Theodorou, B., Liang, W., Mack, C. D., Glass, L. M., Sun, J., & Zou, J. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.08.26.23294629 · Cited by 5
Few-Shot Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using a Siamese Neural Network Framework and Triplet-Based Loss
Marasović, T., & Papić, V. (2025) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a18090567 · Cited by 5
Applying vision transformer to assess multi-scale morphological features in mammography for breast cancer detection: multiscale image morphological extraction vision transformer (MIME-ViT)
Kashiwada, Y., Takaya, E., Hiroya, M., Matsuda, N., Yashima, T., Kobayashi, T., Tamiya, G., & Ueda, T. (2025) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3252 · Cited by 4
AI Use in Mammography for Diagnosing Metachronous Contralateral Breast Cancer
Adachi, M., Fujioka, T., Ishiba, T., Nara, M., Maruya, S., Hayashi, K., Kumaki, Y., Yamaga, E., Katsuta, L., Hao, D., et al. (2024) · Journal of Imaging · doi:10.3390/jimaging10090211 · Cited by 4
Enhancing Breast Cancer Detection Using A Transformer-Based Model
Sharma, S., & Singh, Y. (2024) · International Conference on Information Science and Communications Technologies (ICISCT) · doi:10.1109/icisct64202.2024.10957451 · Cited by 4
Development of a deep learning-based automated diagnostic system (DLADS) for classifying mammographic lesions — a first large-scale multi-institutional clinical trial in Japan
Yamaguchi, T., Koyama, Y., Inoue, K., Ban, K., Hirokaga, K., Kujiraoka, Y., Okanami, Y., Shinohara, N., Tsunoda, H. S., Uematsu, T., et al. (2025) · Breast Cancer · doi:10.1007/s12282-025-01741-3 · Cited by 4
An economic scenario analysis of implementing artificial intelligence in BreastScreen Norway–Impact on radiologist person-years, costs and effects
Moger, T. A., Nardin, S. B., Holen, Å. S., Moshina, N., & Hofvind, S. S. H. (2025) · Journal of Medical Screening · doi:10.1177/09691413251372829 · Cited by 4
Artificial intelligence in cancer screening: a narrative review of current evidence and future directions
Yazarkan, Y., Sönmez, G., Sahin, T. K., Rizzo, A., & Güven, D. C. (2026) · Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1080/14737159.2026.2648127 · Cited by 5
Artificial Intelligence in Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Peng, Y., Chen, Q., Keenan, T. D. L., Chew, E. Y., & Lu, Z. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78601-4_8 · Cited by 4
The Effect of Feature Selection on Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrix (GLCM) for the Four Breast Cancer Classifications
Mawarni, M., Utaminingrum, F., & Mahmudy, W. F. (2022) · Journal of biomimetics, biomaterials and biomedical engineering · doi:10.4028/p-09g3n8 · Cited by 5
Ethical Considerations of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Healthcare
Gichoya, J. W., MELTZER, C. C., Newsome, J. M., Correa, R., Trivedi, H., Banerjee, I., Davis, M. A., & Celi, L. A. (2022) · Contemporary medical imaging · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-92087-6_52 · Cited by 5
Emerging Value-Based Radiology in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
Mun, S. K., Lo, S. B., Wong, K. H., Koh, D., & Prior, F. (2023) · Medical Research Archives · doi:10.18103/mra.v11i5.3915 · Cited by 6
Advancing Diagnostics and Patient Care: The Role of Biomarkers in Radiology
Sebro, R. (2024) · Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology · doi:10.1055/s-0043-1776426 · Cited by 4
The promise of AI in personalized breast cancer screening: are we there yet?
Despina Kontos, B. (2024) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-024-00877-z · Cited by 4
Breast imaging in focus: A bibliometric overview of visual quality, modality innovations, and diagnostic performance
Noor, K. A., Norsuddin, N. M., Isa, I. N. C., & Karim, M. K. A. (2024) · Radiography · doi:10.1016/j.radi.2024.04.019 · Cited by 4
Potential Impact of an Artificial Intelligence–based Mammography Triage Algorithm on Performance and Workload in a Population-based Screening Sample
Watanabe, A. T., Vu, H., Chim, C. Y., Litt, A. W., Retson, T., & Mayo, R. C. (2024) · Journal of Breast Imaging · doi:10.1093/jbi/wbae056 · Cited by 4
Effectiveness of neural language models for word prediction of textual mammography reports
Marin, M. D., Mocanu, E., & Seifert, C. (2020) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc42975.2020.9283304 · Cited by 4
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Mammography from a Development and Validation Perspective
Kim, K. H., & Lee, S. H. (2021) · Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · doi:10.3348/jksr.2020.0205 · Cited by 5
AlexResNet+: A Deep Hybrid Featured Machine Learning Model for Breast Cancer Tissue Classification
Shruthishree S.H, D. H. T. (2021) · Türk bilgisayar ve matematik eğitimi dergisi · doi:10.17762/turcomat.v12i6.5686 · Cited by 4
Two-Stage Multi-Scale Mass Segmentation From Full Mammograms
Yan, Y., Conze, P.-H., Quellec, G., Lamard, M., Cochener, B., & Coatrieux, G. (2021) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9433946 · Cited by 4
A Review of Breast Cancer Classification and Detection Techniques
Mohamed, S. K., Sakr, N. A., & Hikal, N. A. (2021) · International Journal of Advanced Science Computing and Engineering · doi:10.30630/ijasce.3.3.55 · Cited by 4
Is the Cardiovascular Specialist Ready For the Fifth Revolution? The Role of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Big Data Analysis, Intelligent Swarming, and Knowledge-Centered Service on the Future of Global Cardiovascular Healthcare Delivery
Sultan, S., Acharya, Y., Zayed, O., Elzomour, H., Parodi, J. C., Soliman, O. I. I., & Hynes, N. (2022) · Journal of Endovascular Therapy · doi:10.1177/15266028221102660 · Cited by 4
Designing Interaction with AI for Human Learning: Towards Human-Machine Teaming in Radiology Training
Brereton, M. F., Ambe, A. H., Lovell, D. R., Sitbon, L., Capel, T., Soro, A., Xu, Y., Moreira, C., Favre, B., & Bradley, A. P. (2023) · Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OzCHI) · doi:10.1145/3638380.3638435 · Cited by 4
The message matters: changes to binary Computer Aided Detection recommendations affect cancer detection in low prevalence search
Patterson, F., & Kunar, M. A. (2024) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-024-00576-4 · Cited by 4
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Cancer detection using deep learning techniques
Alkurdi, D. A., Ilyas, M., & Jamıl, A. (2021) · Evolutionary Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s12065-021-00635-5 · Cited by 4
Retracted
What Can We Actually See Using Computer Aided Detection in Mammography?
Dominković, M. D. (2020) · Acta Clinica Croatica · doi:10.20471/acc.2020.59.04.02 · Cited by 4
Mammography Image Analysis Using Wavelet and Statistical Features with SVM Classifier
Makandar, A., & Halalli, B. (2017) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5146-3_34 · Cited by 4
Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: The Computer’s Helping Hand Needs Guidance
Sala, E., & Ursprung, S. (2020) · Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.2020200207 · Cited by 4
Editorial Comment: Artificial Intelligence in Mammography—Our New Reality
Khanani, S. (2022) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.22.27345 · Cited by 4
Managing expectations and challenges of AI in radiology
Meijer, F. J. A. (2024) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-024-10790-9 · Cited by 5
Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging: A Special Focus on Advances in Digital Mammography & Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
Marino, M. A., Avendaño, D., Sofia, C., Zapata, P., Portaluri, A., Orlando, A. A. M., Avalos-Montes, P. J., Blandino, A., Ascenti, G., & Cardona-Huerta, S. (2022) · Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews · doi:10.2174/1573405619666221128102209 · Cited by 3
Artificial intelligence-assisted ultrasound screening for breast cancer in China: a prospective, clustered, controlled, population-based study
Shen, J., Liu, Y., Liu, A., Gu, X., Zhou, J., Jiang, P., Mo, M., Zhang, L., Yang, C., Zhou, C., et al. (2025) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/s13058-025-02128-0 · Cited by 3
Artificial intelligence in mammography screening: a narrative review of progress, pitfalls, and potential
Corines, M. J., Christianson, B., Comstock, C., Drotman, M. B., & Dodelzon, K. (2026) · British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1093/bjr/tqag053 · Cited by 4
Clinical Reasoning and Artificial Intelligence
Ghasemi, A., & aali, M. N. (2023) · Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research · doi:10.5812/amh-134440 · Cited by 4
The Breast‐Imaging Operations, Practices and Systems Inventory: A framework to examine mammography facility effects on screening in rural communities
Anderson, R. T., Hillemeier, M. M., CAMACHO, F. T., Harvey, J. A., Bonilla, G., Batten, G. P., Robinson, B., Safon, C. B., & Louis, C. (2023) · The Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/jrh.12798 · Cited by 3
First-in-Human Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Pegfosimer Manganese (SN132D) for Contrast-Enhanced MRI of Breast Cancer
Wärnberg, F., Axelsson, O., Curiac, D., Hargreaves, P., Karakatsanis, A., Lekmeechai, S., & Hansen, M. (2025) · Investigative Radiology · doi:10.1097/rli.0000000000001164 · Cited by 3
Classification of mass type based on segmentation techniques with support vector machine model for diagnosis of breast cancer
Makandar, A., & Halalli, B. (2017) · International Conference on Data Management, Analytics and Innovation (ICDMAI) · doi:10.1109/icdmai.2017.8073490 · Cited by 3
BREAST CANCER SCREENING: CURRENT ACHIEVEMENTS, FUTURE PERSPECTIVES AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES
Pyatnitskiy, I., Сергеевна, П. О., Gombolevskiy, V., Nizovtsova, L., Vetsheva, N., & Morozov, S. P. (2019) · Voprosy Onkologii · doi:10.37469/0507-3758-2019-65-5-664-671 · Cited by 3
The American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) AI/ML expert panel: inception, mandate, work products, and goals
Dreizin, D. (2023) · Emergency Radiology · doi:10.1007/s10140-023-02135-8 · Cited by 2
Artificial intelligence in healthcare
Argenson, A., & Devi-Chou, V. (2023) · Principles of Gender-Specific Medicine · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-88534-8.00025-0 · Cited by 3
The synergy between AI and radiologist in advancing digital mammography: comparative study between stand-alone radiologist and concurrent use of artificial intelligence in BIRADS 4 and 5 female patients
Badawy, E., Shalaby, F. S., El-nasr, S. I. S., Elyamany, A. M., & Hegazy, R. M. A. (2023) · The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1186/s43055-023-01136-4 · Cited by 3
Enhancement Techniques on Deep Learning-based Mammography Classification for Breast Cancer Detection
Yuniarti, A., & Suwida, K. (2023) · International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and System (ICTS) · doi:10.1109/icts58770.2023.10330855 · Cited by 3
Artificial Intelligence - A Primer for Diagnosis and Interpretation of Breast Cancer
Jha, A. M., Mahapatra, A. P. K., Abraham, J., & Ghosh, S. (2024) · International Journal of Trends in OncoScience · doi:10.22376/ijtos.2024.2.1.27-36 · Cited by 3
Artificial intelligence in mammography: advances and challenges
Dhou, S., Alhusari, K., & Alkhodari, M. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95462-4.00004-2 · Cited by 3
Bi-Rads Classification in Mammography using Deep Learning
Tekin, A., Toktay, B., Günay, A. C., Yazgan, H., İnan, N. G., & Kocadağlı, O. (2024) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub518.c2134 · Cited by 3
Artificial intelligence–based computer-aided diagnosis for breast cancer detection on digital mammography in Hong Kong
Yu, S., Young, C. Y., Chan, Y., Chan, Y., Tsoi, C., Choi, M. N., Chan, T., Leung, J. C. S., Chu, C. W., Hung, E. H. Y., et al. (2024) · Hong Kong Medical Journal · doi:10.12809/hkmj2310920 · Cited by 3
Evaluating the Impact of Changes in Artificial Intelligence–derived Case Scores over Time on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Outcomes
Zuckerman, S. P., Periaswamy, S., Shisler, J. L., Elahi, A., Edmonds, C. E., Hoffmeister, J. W., & Conant, E. F. (2025) · Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.230597 · Cited by 3
Comparative Evaluation of Images of Alveolar Bone Loss Using Panoramic Images and Artificial Intelligence
Mathur, A. S., Pawar, S., Kamma, P. K. G., Obulareddy, V. T., Dash, K. S., Meto, A., & Mehta, V. (2025) · International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences (ASEC) · doi:10.3390/engproc2025087080 · Cited by 3
Künstliche Intelligenz – Anwendungsbereiche in der Onkologie
Neumuth, T. (2020) · Forum · doi:10.1007/s12312-019-00734-6 · Cited by 3
Average absorbed breast dose (2ABD): an easy radiation dose index for digital breast tomosynthesis
Traino, C., Barca, P., Lamastra, R., Tucciariello, R. M., Sottocornola, C., Marini, C., Aringhieri, G., Caramella, D., & Fantacci, M. E. (2020) · European Radiology Experimental · doi:10.1186/s41747-020-00165-2 · Cited by 3
Intelligence artificielle : Place dans le dépistage du cancer du sein en France
Thomassin‐Naggara, I., Ceugnart, L., Tardivon, A. A., Verzaux, L., Balleyguier, C., Taourel, P., & Séradour, B. (2022) · Bulletin du Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.04.008 · Cited by 3
Cost of artificial intelligence: Elephant in the room and its cage
Hassan, C., Repici, A., & Mori, Y. (2023) · Digestive Endoscopy · doi:10.1111/den.14567 · Cited by 3
Clinical Implementation of AI in Screening Mammography: The Essential Role of Prospective Evaluation
Lee, A. Y., & Friedewald, S. M. (2024) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.241124 · Cited by 3
Prospects of using artificial intelligence for improving cancer screening efficаcy
Zaridze, D. G. (2024) · Public Health · doi:10.21045/2782-1676-2024-4-4-24-42 · Cited by 2
AI-CAD-Guided Mammographic Assessment of Tumor Size and T Stage: Concordance with MRI for Clinical Staging in Breast Cancer Patients Considered for NAC
Park, G. E., Shin, K., Mun, H. S., & Kang, B. J. (2025) · Tomography · doi:10.3390/tomography11070072 · Cited by 2
Radiologic Windchill
Behzad, S., Boucher, J. O., Alavijeh, N. S., Ravi, K., & Gholamrezanezhad, A. (2025) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2025.07.057 · Cited by 2
AI assistance improves reader agreement in digital mammography: A multireader crossover study of general and breast subspecialty radiologists
Ahmadzade, M., Rouientan, H., Abdi, N., Norouzi, M., Hakimi, M., Bahrambeigi, M., Pouya, E. K., Bahmanyar, F., Haghi, S., Abbasi, F., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-31065-3 · Cited by 4
Breast Cancer Detection Using Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm
Shashidhar, R., Arunakumari, B. N., S, N. F. H., Puneeth, S. B., Santhosh Kumar, R., & Roopa, M. S. (2020) · ASIAN JOURNAL OF CONVERGENCE IN TECHNOLOGY · doi:10.33130/ajct.2020v06i03.006 · Cited by 2
Künstliche Intelligenz in der modernen Mammadiagnostik
Banys‐Paluchowski, M., Molinos, L. D., Rübsamen, M., Töllner, T., Rody, A., Fehm, T. N., Bündgen, N. K., & Krawczyk, N. (2022) · Die Gynäkologie · doi:10.1007/s00129-022-04997-4 · Cited by 2
The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Detecting Breast Lesions with Medical Imaging: A Literature Review
Alghamdi, S. S. (2023) · International Journal of Biomedicine · doi:10.21103/article13(1)_ra1 · Cited by 2
Image Enhancement for Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammography Using Deep Learning
Kardawi, M. Y., & Sarno, R. (2023) · International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology and Engineering (ICCoSITE) · doi:10.1109/iccosite57641.2023.10127835 · Cited by 2
Deep Positional-Representation-Based Local Information Retention Networks for Mammography Classification
Han, B., Sun, L., Li, C., Yu, Z., Jiang, W., Liu, W., Tao, D., & Liu, B. (2023) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc53992.2023.10394084 · Cited by 2
Neuromarkers in addiction: definitions, development strategies, and recent advances
Harp, N. R., Wager, T. D., & Hedy Kober, A. (2024) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-024-02766-2 · Cited by 3
Diagnosing Breast Cancer Using AI: A Comparison of Deep Learning and Traditional Machine Learning Methods
Olowofeso, A. M., Akpunomu, S. T., Oni, O. S., & Sawe, C. A. (2024) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24may2174 · Cited by 2
Enhancing Breast Cancer Detection Systems: Augmenting Mammogram Images Using Generative Adversarial Networks
Rifat, M., Uddin, M. S., Rozario, V. S., & Nandi, D. (2024) · Studies in big data · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-3966-0_9 · Cited by 2
Vision Transformer-Based Breast Mass Diagnosis in Mammography Using Bilateral Information
Zeng, T., Zhang, Z., Zeng, Y., Zhang, X., Ichiji, K., & Homma, N. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Engineering and Technology (IICAIET) · doi:10.1109/iicaiet62352.2024.10730097 · Cited by 2
Artificial Intelligence for Early Breast Cancer Detection
Deendyal, V., Ghazaryan, L., Linden, E. A., Allen, L., & Thaker, N. G. (2025) · AI in Precision Oncology · doi:10.1089/aipo.2024.0051 · Cited by 4
New Mammography Tools — The Need for Clinically Meaningful Assessment Standards
Hyams, B., Kerlikowske, K. M., & Redberg, R. F. (2025) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2500274 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Potential Benefits of Computer-Aided Detection for Cancer Identification and Treatment
Brem, R. F. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.8459 · Cited by 2
The effect of prevalence of disease on performance of residents and fellows during training for interpreting DBT in a test-train-test observer study
Hakim, C. M., Sen, L. Q. C., Degnan, A. J., Delic, J. A., Pai, S. S., Sagreiya, H., Sparrow, M., Thomas, E., Yannes, M. P., & Gur, D. (2017) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.2249341 · Cited by 2
An Interpretable SVM Based Model for Cancer Prediction in Mammograms
Verma, A., Shukla, P., Abhishek, & Verma, S. (2018) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2372-0_39 · Cited by 2
Diagnostic Value of 1st and 2nd Generation Computer Aided Detection Systems for Mammography: a Comparative Assessment
Валерьевич, П. Д., Александрович, Е. И., Kolchev, A. А., Kliouchkin, I. V., & Busygina, O. V. (2017) · Medical Visualization · doi:10.24835/1607-0763-2017-1-90-102 · Cited by 2
Prescreening for Intracranial Hemorrhage on CT Head Scans with an AI-Based Radiology Workflow Triage Tool: An Accuracy Study
Yg, C., Mm, M., & Pressman, B. D. (2019) · Journal of Medical Diagnostic Methods · Cited by 2
Possibility of predicting missing teeth using deep learning: a pilot study
Kim, S., Rim, D., Heo, J. U., & Cho, H. (2019) · 대한구강보건학회지 · doi:10.11149/jkaoh.2019.43.4.210 · Cited by 2

Authors: Lehman, C. D., Wellman, R. D., Buist, D. S. M., Kerlikowske, K., Tosteson, A. N. A., & Miglioretti, D. L.
Affiliations: Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author: Lehman, Constance D.
ORCID: Lehman, Constance D.
Wellman, Robert D.
Buist, Diana S. M.
Kerlikowske, Karla
Tosteson, Anna N. A.
Miglioretti, Diana L.
Venue: JAMA Internal Medicine
Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
Published: 2015-11-01
Volume: 175
Issue: 11
Pages: 1828
ISSN: 2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5231
PMC: PMC4836172
OpenAlex: W1917647701
Cited by: 678
References: 44
Citations by year: 2026: 38 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 1
FWCI: 20.30
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Locations: JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders: National Cancer Institute (HHSN261201100031C, U54CA163303, P30CA023108, P01CA154292)
Topics: Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords: computer-aided detection, digital mammography, breast cancer screening, diagnostic accuracy, mammography sensitivity, screen-detected breast cancer, interval breast cancer, Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, community practice, radiologist interpretation, breast cancer detection rate, mammography quality assurance
MeSH terms: Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mammography, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Registries, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Logistic Models, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks